Skip to content
Storgy

Common SenseNon-fiction by Thomas Paine

Introduction

1 of 5 · summary, analysis, and key quotes

What happens in Introduction of Common Sense?

Thomas Paine begins Common Sense (1776) not by listing grievances but by laying out a fundamental argument about the essence of government. He clearly differentiates between society and government: society is a positive force arising from human needs and cooperation, while government is, at most, a necessary evil—an institution created to restrain human vices. Paine illustrates this idea with a thought experiment involving a small group of settlers in a remote area who, starting from a state of natural freedom, gradually establish rules and elect representatives, only to see those representatives stray from their constituents' interests. From this scenario, Paine derives a key principle: regular elections are the only dependable safeguard against the abuse of power. He then shifts his focus to the English constitution, rejecting its praised balance of the king, lords, and commons as mere fiction. He contends that the commons cannot effectively check the crown since the crown appoints the lords and influences elections. This introduction sets the stage for Paine's argument: he is not seeking reform but actively challenging the very legitimacy of monarchical rule before his colonial audience can voice any objections.

Analysis

Paine begins with a rhetorical approach before diving into philosophical arguments. By distinguishing "society" from "government" in his opening lines, he diminishes the government's organic dignity—it isn't the pinnacle of civilization but rather its safety net. The subsequent pastoral thought experiment serves as an excellent example of accessible political theory: Paine reinterprets Lockean social-contract concepts into a relatable scene for colonial readers, all while avoiding Locke's complex jargon. His writing style reflects this straightforwardness. Sentences are short, direct, and build upon one another; subordinate clauses are uncommon. This choice is intentional— the pamphlet rejects the complex syntax that suggests elite authorship, embodying its democratic message in its very structure.

The theme of necessity runs through the chapter like a fault line. Government is essential; kings are not. This distinction will play a significant role in the following pages, and Paine introduces it subtly, almost as a definition rather than an assertion. His analysis of the English constitution brings in another theme: theatrical appearance versus structural reality. The constitution may appear balanced, but Paine reveals the mechanisms hidden behind the scenes. The tone shifts noticeably when he discusses monarchy—the initially measured and almost instructional tone gives way to an unmistakable contempt, a change that lets readers know they are being drawn into an argument, rather than just being informed about one.

Key quotes from Introduction

  • “Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices.”

    Paine's opening definitional salvo, establishing the society/government binary that structures the entire pamphlet.

  • “Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.”

    The sentence that crystallizes Paine's foundational premise and would become one of the most quoted lines in American political writing.

  • “The more simple any thing is, the less liable it is to be disordered, and the easier repaired when disordered.”

    Paine's justification for preferring plain republican government over the complex, interlocking machinery of the English constitution.

Check your understanding

5 questions · answers checked on this page, free

  1. 01How does Paine fundamentally distinguish society from government in the opening of this chapter?
  2. 02In Paine's thought experiment, what causes the representatives chosen by the settlers to become a problem?
  3. 03What safeguard does Paine identify as the only dependable protection against the abuse of power by representatives?
  4. 04Why does Paine argue that the English constitution's celebrated balance among king, lords, and commons is a fiction?
  5. 05What does Paine's choice of short, direct sentences and avoidance of complex syntax in this chapter signal about his intended audience and purpose?
0 of 5 answered

Ask about this work

The reader has this chapter in front of it — the summary, the analysis, the key quotes and the vocabulary — along with the rest of the book’s chapters. Ask what happens and why it matters, or push back on a reading.

It cites the chapter or the line it is working from, and it says so plainly when the guide doesn’t cover something. It’s instructed never to write an essay, a paragraph or an answer for you to hand in, and never to grade anything — it will show you how to approach the question instead.

Sign in to ask the reader about this work — 1 credit a message.

Create an accountSign in

Vocabulary in Introduction

6 words from this section, defined in the sense Common Sense uses.

wickedness
Moral wrongdoing and selfish behavior in people that makes external control necessary; Paine uses it to explain why government must exist at all, not as a positive good but as a check on human failings.
affections
The natural bonds of goodwill and fellow-feeling that draw people together into communities; here it means the social ties that make cooperation possible, not romantic love.
vices
Harmful habits or immoral behaviors that damage individuals and communities; Paine argues government's sole purpose is to hold these in check.
necessary evil
Something harmful or undesirable that must nonetheless be tolerated because it prevents something worse; Paine uses the phrase to deny that government is ever genuinely good.
intolerable
So bad or oppressive that it cannot be endured or accepted; Paine applies it to government at its worst to signal that rebellion becomes justified.
disordered
Broken down or thrown into confusion so that it no longer functions properly; used here to argue that simpler systems are easier to fix when they go wrong.

All vocabulary in Common Sense →