Skip to content
Storgy

Character analysis

Roland Pattillo

in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot

Roland Pattillo is a cancer researcher and professor at Morehouse School of Medicine, acting as an important link between the scientific community and the Lacks family in Rebecca Skloot's narrative. As an African American oncologist who has worked with HeLa cells throughout his career, Pattillo holds a unique moral stance: he benefits from the scientific advancements enabled by the cells while passionately advocating for a family that was neither compensated nor fully informed about Henrietta's contributions. He organizes the annual HeLa Cancer Control Symposium at Morehouse, dedicating it to Henrietta's memory, and becomes one of the first scientists to publicly acknowledge her by name, addressing the racial and ethical issues surrounding her case. Pattillo emerges as one of Skloot's key allies, helping her earn the Lacks family's trust—especially Deborah—by vouching for her intentions and framing the project as a way to finally recognize Henrietta's legacy. He is warm, outspoken, and driven by a strong sense of justice, consistently stressing that Henrietta was a Black woman whose body was taken without consent from a segregated hospital, highlighting that this history is inseparable from the science. His character in the book remains consistent—he starts as a committed advocate and continues in that role—but his influence is critical in enhancing Skloot's access and legitimizing the broader ethical discussion that the book aims to address.

About this character

Form
Non-fiction
Author
Rebecca Skloot
First published
2010

The person01–03

01·Who they are

Who is Roland Pattillo?

Roland Pattillo is a cancer researcher and professor at Morehouse School of Medicine, uniquely positioned in Rebecca Skloot's narrative as a working scientist who has built part of his career on HeLa cells while refusing to treat those cells as ethically neutral laboratory material. As an African American oncologist, he occupies the intersection of two worlds: the biomedical establishment that profited from Henrietta Lacks's tissue and the Black community that faced the consequences of that exploitation. Skloot introduces him as the organizer of the annual HeLa Cancer Control Symposium at Morehouse, an institution historically dedicated to training Black physicians. Pattillo's choice to hold the symposium there emphasizes his belief that the story of HeLa is intertwined with the history of race and medicine in America. He is warm and direct, described as someone who speaks with moral urgency instead of academic caution, and his willingness to publicly name Henrietta — at a time when many in the scientific community still referred only to 'the HeLa cell line' — sets him apart as a genuinely unusual figure in the landscape Skloot depicts.

02·Arc & motivation

What is Roland Pattillo's arc and motivation?

Unlike most characters in the book, Pattillo does not undergo a visible transformation; his role remains consistent from his first appearance to his last. His motivations stem from a complex mix of professional conscience and racial justice. Having worked with HeLa cells, he recognizes their scientific value, which lends weight to his insistence on ethical reckoning. His organization of the Morehouse symposium serves as an ongoing, institutionalized act of redress: year after year, he creates a formal occasion where Henrietta's name is spoken aloud in a scientific context, counteracting decades of erasure. His motivation also reflects a communal aspect. He belongs to a tradition of Black medical professionals who have had to navigate institutions that systematically excluded or exploited Black patients, and his advocacy for the Lacks family connects to a larger history of resistance and repair.

03·Key moments

What are Roland Pattillo's key moments?

The most consequential moment involving Pattillo is his role in facilitating Skloot's relationship with Deborah Lacks. When Skloot struggles to earn the family's trust — a challenge that spans years and reflects deep, justified suspicions built over decades of interaction with researchers and journalists who offered little in return — Pattillo intervenes as a guarantor. His endorsement of Skloot is significant; coming from a Black scientist with a public advocacy record for Henrietta, it carries weight that no white institution could match. The Morehouse symposium itself serves as another key moment in the text: it is depicted as one of the few spaces where Henrietta is honored rather than merely used, and Skloot emphasizes how exceptional that recognition was compared to the broader scientific culture. Pattillo also frames for Skloot — and through her, for the reader — the explicit argument that Henrietta was a Black woman taken from a segregated hospital, asserting that this fact must not be overlooked in any honest account of the cells' origins.

The cast04–05

04·Relationships

What are Roland Pattillo's most important relationships?

Pattillo's relationship with Skloot operates almost as a sponsorship: he opens doors, provides credibility, and consistently guides her toward the ethical core of the story. With Deborah, he acts as a reassuring bridge, someone whose identity and institutional affiliation enable Deborah to believe that her mother's story might finally be told with dignity. His implicit relationship with George Gey is characterized by generational and ethical distance — Pattillo represents a later generation of HeLa researchers for whom awareness of the original consent failures is unavoidable, making his career a kind of corrective commentary on Gey's era. In contrast to the Johns Hopkins establishment represented by figures like Howard Jones, Pattillo's affiliation with Morehouse serves as a statement: the story of HeLa belongs not only to elite research universities but also to the Black medical tradition those universities historically excluded.

05·Connected characters

How is Roland Pattillo connected to the other characters?

Rebecca Skloot

Pattillo acts as a sponsor and moral compass for Skloot, vouching for her to the Lacks family and encouraging her to center the racial and ethical injustices of Henrietta's story. He is one of the first insiders to grant her meaningful access and credibility.

Deborah Lacks

Pattillo helps broker trust between Deborah and Skloot, reassuring Deborah that Skloot's intentions are honorable. His annual symposium honoring Henrietta resonates deeply with Deborah's lifelong desire to see her mother recognized and respected.

Henrietta Lacks

Pattillo dedicates his HeLa Cancer Control Symposium at Morehouse to Henrietta's memory, making him one of the rare scientists who publicly names and honors her, insisting her humanity and racial identity are inseparable from the cells' scientific legacy.

George Gey

Pattillo represents a later generation of HeLa researchers whose relationship to the cells is shaped by awareness of the ethical failures of Gey's era, implicitly critiquing the original lack of consent and recognition that characterized Gey's acquisition of Henrietta's tissue.

Howard Jones

Both Pattillo and Jones are physicians connected to the medical history of HeLa cells, though Pattillo's advocacy for the Lacks family contrasts with the more clinically distanced perspective associated with the Johns Hopkins establishment that Jones represented.

Study06–07

06·Questions

Questions readers ask about Roland Pattillo

Who is Roland Pattillo in The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks?

Roland Pattillo is a cancer researcher and professor at Morehouse School of Medicine who organizes the annual HeLa Cancer Control Symposium in Henrietta's honor. As an African American oncologist who has built part of his career on HeLa cells, he occupies a rare dual position: a working scientist who benefits from the cells while publicly demanding ethical reckoning for the family they came from. Skloot presents him as one of the few figures in the scientific community willing to name Henrietta aloud rather than refer only to "the HeLa cell line."

What is the HeLa Cancer Control Symposium that Pattillo organizes, and why does it matter?

The HeLa Cancer Control Symposium is an annual event Pattillo holds at Morehouse School of Medicine, dedicated to Henrietta Lacks's memory. It is significant because it represents the most sustained, institutionalized form of recognition Henrietta receives anywhere in the narrative — a formal scientific occasion where her name is spoken with dignity rather than erased. Holding it at Morehouse, a school historically devoted to training Black physicians, underscores Pattillo's argument that HeLa's story is inseparable from the history of race and medicine in America.

How does Pattillo help Rebecca Skloot gain access to the Lacks family?

Pattillo acts as a guarantor for Skloot, vouching for her intentions and helping broker trust between her and Deborah Lacks. Because the family harbored deep, justified suspicion of researchers and journalists who had historically offered them nothing in return, Pattillo's endorsement — coming from a Black scientist with a public record of advocating for Henrietta — carried credibility that no white institution could provide. His sponsorship is described as one of the critical moments that gave Skloot meaningful access to the story.

What is Pattillo's relationship with Deborah Lacks?

Pattillo serves as a reassuring bridge between Deborah and Skloot, persuading Deborah that Skloot's project could finally tell her mother's story with dignity. His annual symposium honoring Henrietta resonates powerfully with Deborah's lifelong desire to see her mother recognized and respected. By combining institutional credibility with genuine advocacy for the Lacks family, Pattillo gives Deborah a reason to believe this retelling would be different from the exploitative encounters the family had experienced before.

Why does Pattillo insist on naming Henrietta Lacks as a Black woman taken from a segregated hospital?

Pattillo insists on this framing because he believes the racial and ethical dimensions of Henrietta's case are inseparable from the science itself. His motivation stems from both professional conscience and a commitment to racial justice rooted in his experience as an African American physician navigating institutions that have historically exploited Black patients. By publicly naming Henrietta and emphasizing the segregated context in which her tissue was taken without full consent, he performs what the book frames as a political act of counter-memory against decades of scientific erasure.

How does Pattillo's position as a HeLa researcher affect the power of his advocacy?

Pattillo's simultaneous use of HeLa cells and advocacy for the Lacks family complicates any simple narrative of exploitation. Because he has built part of his career on the very cells he argues were taken unjustly, his critique carries a weight that outside commentators could not match — he speaks from inside the biomedical establishment. Skloot presents this insider status as what makes him an unusually credible and morally serious voice: he cannot be dismissed as ignorant of the science, yet he refuses to treat the cells as ethically neutral.

How does Pattillo's affiliation with Morehouse contrast with the Johns Hopkins establishment in the book?

Pattillo's base at Morehouse — an institution historically dedicated to training Black physicians — stands in deliberate contrast to the Johns Hopkins establishment, represented by figures like Howard Jones, where Henrietta was treated in a segregated ward and her tissue taken without informed consent. By centering the HeLa story at Morehouse rather than at elite research universities, Pattillo implicitly argues that the legacy of the cells belongs to the Black medical tradition those universities long excluded, not only to the institutions that profited from them.

07·Essay angles

Use this in your essay

Tool · Essay angles

  • Institutional reckoning as advocacy

    Argue that Pattillo's Morehouse symposium represents the most sustained, institutionalized form of recognition Henrietta receives in the narrative — and examine what that reveals about the origins of ethical correctives in medicine.

  • The insider critic

    Analyze how Pattillo's simultaneous use and advocacy around HeLa cells complicate straightforward narratives of exploitation, and consider whether his position enhances or diminishes the power of his critique.

  • Race, medicine, and naming

    Explore how Pattillo's insistence on naming Henrietta functions as a political act, connecting her erasure to broader patterns of how Black patients have been rendered invisible in medical history.

  • Trust as a structural problem

    Use Pattillo's role in bridging Skloot and the Lacks family to develop a thesis about why the family's trust could not be earned by a white researcher alone, and what that suggests about race and credibility in journalistic and scientific contexts.

  • Corrective memory

    Examine Pattillo as a figure of counter-memory — someone who utilizes scientific and institutional platforms to restore what official histories have omitted — and relate this to Skloot's own project in writing the book.

The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

Continue

Full study guide →