Skip to content
Storgy

Year 12–13 / Grades 11–12

Middlemarch — a five-lesson scheme of work

This sequence starts with Eliot's portrayal of female ambition in the Prelude, moves through the parallel marriages of Dorothea and Casaubon, as well as Lydgate and Rosamond, and culminates in the novel's moral peak during Dorothea's night of self-renunciation, leading to the Finale's well-known 'unhistoric acts' passage. Students begin by exploring Eliot's narrative voice, then examine her use of free indirect discourse to develop characters. They compare the two marriages, analyze how money and power lead to corruption, and ultimately craft a well-supported argument. By the end, the class will be able to dissect Eliot's prose style, create comparative analyses across different plot lines, and understand the novel's place within the context of Victorian reform.

Objectives

  • Analyse how Eliot's narratorial voice and use of the Saint Theresa figure in the Prelude frames the novel's central question about women and ambition.
  • Identify and explain the effect of free indirect discourse in passages focalized through Dorothea and Lydgate, showing how Eliot generates ironic distance.
  • Compare the marriages of Dorothea/Casaubon and Lydgate/Rosamond as parallel studies in disillusionment, using specific scenes from Books I–VI.
  • Analyse how Eliot uses the Bulstrode/Raffles plot in Books VI–VII to explore the relationship between guilt, money, and social respectability.
  • Write a well-structured, evidenced analytical paragraph that makes and sustains a precise argument about Eliot's methods and their effects in Middlemarch.

The sequence

  1. Lesson 1: The Unhistoric Woman: Eliot's Narratorial Voice in the Prelude and Book I

    60 min · ch. 1
    Do now

    In the final sentence of the Prelude, 'her' refers to the character of Dorothea Brooke, who embodies a sensitive and passionate spirit. Eliot appears to be suggesting that women's lives often express profound depth and complexity, even if their contributions go unrecognized or uncelebrated in society.

    Teacher input

    Model a close reading of the Prelude's Saint Theresa paragraph ('Who that cares much to know the history of man…'). Show how Eliot's narrator shifts between broad historical generalizations ('These later-born Theresas') and the specific example of Dorothea. Highlight how the term 'unhistoric' operates on two levels — it captures women's invisibility while also placing them at the center of history. Note the transition from third-person plural to singular as a structural representation of the argument.

    Independent task

    Students annotate the opening paragraph of Chapter 1, which describes Dorothea: "Miss Brooke had that kind of beauty which seems to be thrown into relief by poor dress." They need to pinpoint three instances where the narrator's voice comes through, labeling each one as sympathetic, ironic, or ambivalent. For each instance, they should write two sentences explaining its effect. Finally, they submit their annotated extract along with the labels and their written commentary.

    Exit ticket

    The Prelude suggests that Dorothea had the potential to be an idealistic, impactful figure, while Chapter 1 reveals her opting for a more conventional life, creating a tension for the reader between her aspirations and her reality.

  2. Lesson 2: Disillusionment in Rome: Free Indirect Discourse in Dorothea's Honeymoon Crisis (Book II)

    60 min · ch. 1, 2
    Do now

    Without looking at the text, jot down three adjectives that come to mind when you think of Casaubon based on your readings so far. Then, locate one quote from Chapters 1 to 12 that backs up each of those adjectives. Be prepared to discuss your findings.

    Teacher input

    Model the technique of free indirect discourse on the passage in Chapter 20 (Book II) where Dorothea weeps in Rome: 'She had not yet felt how it would be to have Casaubon's mind… she was sobbing bitterly.' Highlight how the sentence 'What was there to do?' does not reflect Eliot's voice nor is it direct speech — it conveys Dorothea's consciousness in third person. Illustrate how this approach creates a sense of closeness with Dorothea while also establishing ironic distance, as the reader perceives what Dorothea cannot: that her grief is partly self-inflicted.

    Independent task

    Students should choose a passage of 8–12 lines from Chapters 13–22 that is focalized through either Lydgate (for example, his initial impressions of Rosamond at the Vincys' dinner in Chapter 16) or Casaubon (like his letter of proposal in Chapter 5). They need to write a paragraph of 150–200 words that identifies at least one instance of free indirect discourse, explains what this reveals about the character's self-deception, and comments on Eliot's use of irony. The paragraph must be submitted.

    Exit ticket

    Free indirect discourse is a narrative technique that blends the narrator's voice with a character's inner thoughts, allowing readers to experience the character's perspective without direct quotation. An example from today's lesson is: "She felt a strange mix of excitement and dread as she approached the door."

  3. Lesson 3: Two Marriages, One Argument: Comparing Dorothea/Casaubon and Lydgate/Rosamond (Books III–V)

    60 min · ch. 3, 4, 5
    Do now

    Look at these two lines. Line A: 'He had previously noted with approval her sole focus on homemaking' (Casaubon on Dorothea, Book IV, Ch. 37). Line B: 'He lacked a wide imagination for understanding other people's feelings' (narrator on Lydgate, Book II, Ch. 16). What do both men share in common? Write two sentences.

    Teacher input

    In both scenes, Casaubon and Lydgate exert control over their wives' futures, illustrating a structural parallel in their attempts to dominate. Casaubon, in Book V, Chapter 48, implores Dorothea to uphold his wishes even after his death, casting a shadow over her autonomy. In contrast, Lydgate, in Book IV, Chapter 36, dismisses Rosamond's concerns about relocating, showcasing his disregard for her feelings. Eliot's narrative sympathy varies significantly between the two: Dorothea's refusal to submit to Casaubon's demands is framed as an act of moral courage, while Rosamond's objections are portrayed as mere obstinacy. This nuanced portrayal complicates the parallel; it suggests that while both men seek to dictate their wives' paths, the moral weight of their respective wives' responses and the underlying motivations differ profoundly, prompting readers to reconsider the implications of control and resistance within marriage.

    Independent task

    Students will write a comparative analytical paragraph (180–220 words) that addresses the question: 'How does Eliot use the marriages of Dorothea and Lydgate to explore the theme of disillusionment?' In their response, they must include quotations from at least two of the following chapters: 28, 36, 37, or 48. Each quotation should highlight a specific technique used by Eliot, and they should also make a point about what the parallel structure of the marriages suggests about the concept of marriage in Middlemarch. The completed paragraph should be submitted.

    Exit ticket

    The Dorothea/Casaubon marriage and the Lydgate/Rosamond marriage both reflect the constraints imposed by societal expectations, yet Eliot portrays them differently by showcasing Dorothea's inner conflict and growth compared to Lydgate's stagnation in his relationship.

  4. Lesson 4: Guilt, Money, and Respectability: The Bulstrode/Raffles Plot in Books VI–VII

    60 min · ch. 6, 7
    Do now

    Bulstrode's commitment to religion may not have brought him financial success, but it created the environment for his ambition to thrive. Eliot suggests that while religion may not directly benefit one's material desires, it can foster a mindset that supports personal ambitions.

    Teacher input

    Model a reading of the scene in Book VII, Chapter 69, where Bulstrode provides Lydgate with a loan, fully aware that it will put him in a difficult position. Pay special attention to the narrator's line: 'He was not a coward: he had the courage that belongs to energetic egoism.' Demonstrate to students how Eliot's narrator employs paradox by describing Bulstrode as courageous while simultaneously framing that courage as a kind of selfishness. This technique complicates moral judgment, suggesting that things are not black and white. Relate this to the broader theme of the novel, which argues that guilt is seldom straightforward and that social respectability cannot be trusted as a true measure of inner virtue.

    Independent task

    Students write a 180–220-word analytical paragraph addressing the question: "How does Eliot portray Bulstrode as both guilty and sympathetic in Books VI and VII?" They need to include quotes from at least two of the following chapters: 53, 61, 68, or 69. In their analysis, they should identify Eliot's use of paradox or irony in each quote and conclude with a sentence discussing what Bulstrode's fate implies about the connection between money and moral standing in Middlemarch. The paragraph is then submitted.

    Exit ticket

    Lydgate's acceptance of Bulstrode's loan in Chapter 69 costs him his integrity and leads to his eventual downfall. This choice ties into the novel's theme of ambition by illustrating how the pursuit of success can compromise one's values and lead to negative consequences.

  5. Lesson 5: 'Unhistoric Acts': The Finale and the Novel's Moral Vision

    60 min · ch. 1, 8
    Do now

    Without looking at the text, jot down your predictions for what happens to Dorothea, Lydgate, Rosamond, and Fred by the novel's conclusion. Next to each name, provide a single word that captures whether their ending seems earned, ironic, or disappointing — and explain your reasoning.

    Teacher input

    Model a reading of the Finale's closing paragraph: 'The growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs.' This passage revisits and reinterprets the image of Saint Theresa from the Prelude; here, 'unhistoric' actions are redefined not as a sign of failure but as a mark of moral heroism. Eliot’s choice to address the audience with 'you and me' directly involves the reader in this contemplation.

    Using this perspective, we can assess Dorothea's decision to marry Ladislaw and give up her inheritance. Her choice can be seen as a personal act of unhistoric significance—one that may not be publicly celebrated but contributes to the greater good, reflecting the quiet heroism of those who live faithfully and make sacrifices for love and integrity.

    Independent task

    Students are tasked with writing a complete analytical paragraph (200–250 words) that responds to the question: 'How does the Finale's closing passage reshape the novel's depiction of Dorothea's life?' In their analysis, they should include quotes from both the Prelude and the closing paragraph of the Finale, point out at least one structural or linguistic technique used in each, and discuss whether the ending portrays Dorothea's choices as a triumph, a compromise, or a combination of both. This paragraph will be submitted and will serve as the foundation for the summative task.

    Exit ticket

    In one sentence: Does the Finale's last paragraph imply that Dorothea's life has been wasted, or does it reshape our understanding of what constitutes a meaningful life? Use one word from the passage to back up your response.

Activities

Prelude vs. Finale: Bookend Close Reading 25 min · pairs

Each pair gets a printed extract showing the Saint Theresa paragraph from the Prelude next to the closing paragraph from the Finale ('The growing good of the world…'). Students annotate both extracts by focusing on: (1) how Eliot portrays the 'unhistoric' woman, (2) any change in tone between the two passages, and (3) one word or phrase that appears in or resonates in both. Pairs return a jointly annotated sheet featuring three bullet-point observations, one for each category.

Free Indirect Discourse Sorting Activity 20 min · groups

Groups of three get an envelope containing twelve sentence strips from Chapters 16, 20, 36, and 48 — featuring a blend of direct speech, narratorial commentary, and free indirect discourse. Students organize these strips into three labeled columns on a large sheet: 'Narrator's voice', 'Character's direct speech', and 'Free indirect discourse'. They need to write one sentence under each FID strip explaining whose consciousness it reflects and what irony it presents. Groups then return the annotated sorting sheet.

Marriage Comparison Spider Diagram 20 min · pairs

Pairs receive a pre-drawn diagram featuring two outer circles (Dorothea/Casaubon and Lydgate/Rosamond) alongside a shared central space. Drawing from Chapters 3–5, students fill the outer circles with specific quotes and scenes that highlight each marriage, while the central space showcases structural similarities. They need to incorporate at least four quotes in total. Once finished, the annotated diagram is returned and can serve as a planning tool for the final essay.

Bulstrode's Defence: Structured Moral Debate 30 min · whole class

Half the class prepares a two-minute spoken argument that Bulstrode is mostly a victim of circumstance, drawing on evidence from Chapters 61 and 68. The other half argues that he is morally responsible, referencing Chapters 53 and 69. After both sides present, the class votes and then writes a single sentence: 'Eliot portrays Bulstrode as [adjective] because [quotation + technique].' Each student submits their sentence as an exit product.

Paragraph Surgery: Peer Marking with a Sentence-Level Checklist 25 min · pairs

Each student brings the analytical paragraph they wrote in Lesson 3 or 4. They then pair up to exchange their work and mark it using a four-point checklist: (1) Is there a clear argument in the opening sentence? (2) Does each quotation include a named technique? (3) Is there a comment on its effect? (4) Does the paragraph conclude with a point about the novel's broader meaning? Markers will write one sentence highlighting a 'strength' and another suggesting a 'next step.' The marked paragraph along with the feedback is then returned to the teacher.

Character Trajectory Timeline 20 min · individual

Each student gets a blank timeline that stretches from Book I to the Finale. They will trace the emotional or social journey of one assigned character (Dorothea, Lydgate, or Bulstrode) by marking at least five significant moments throughout all eight books, noting a quotation or scene reference at each mark, and drawing an arrow above the line (for rising fortunes) or below (for falling fortunes) to show the character's trajectory. Students will also write a sentence about Eliot's technique for two of their five points. Once finished, the timelines are submitted.

Assessment

  • Lesson 1 exit ticket — checks whether students can articulate the tension between the Prelude's aspirational framing and Dorothea's actual choices in Chapter 1, revealing whether they have grasped Eliot's ironic narratorial stance.
  • Lesson 2 annotated paragraph — checks whether students can locate and label free indirect discourse accurately in a passage they have chosen themselves, rather than one pre-selected by the teacher.
  • Lesson 3 comparative paragraph — checks whether students can sustain a two-text argument using specific scene references from Books III–V, rather than paraphrasing plot.
  • Lesson 4 exit ticket — checks whether students can connect Lydgate's financial compromise in Chapter 69 to the novel's thematic argument about ambition and social entanglement.
  • Paragraph Surgery peer feedback (Activity 5) — checks whether students can apply the analytical checklist to a peer's writing, revealing gaps in their own understanding of what a strong evidenced argument looks like in this text.

Summative task

Write a 600–800-word essay addressing the question: 'How does George Eliot use Dorothea Brooke to examine the tension between personal ambition and societal constraints in Middlemarch?' You should focus on at least three of the following moments: the Prelude's Saint Theresa passage; Dorothea's honeymoon crisis in Chapter 20; Casaubon's codicil in Book V; Dorothea's night of self-renunciation in Chapter 80; and the closing paragraph of the Finale. For each moment you discuss, identify a specific technique, provide accurate quotations, and explain their impact. Your essay should present a clear argument about what Eliot's portrayal of Dorothea reveals regarding women, ambition, and the limitations imposed by Victorian society.

Marking notes

Top-band responses identify Eliot's techniques, such as free indirect discourse, narratorial intrusion, and the structural parallels between the Prelude and Finale, and discuss how these elements shape the reader's understanding of Dorothea's choices. Mid-band responses reference relevant quotations and offer valid insights but tend to treat techniques merely as labels instead of interpretive tools. Lower-band responses focus on retelling the plot or making broad statements about 'Victorian society' without connecting them back to the text. The main distinction lies in whether the student can demonstrate that Eliot's narrative form—specifically the double narrative structure and the intrusive narrator—contributes to the novel's commentary on unhistoric lives.

Standards covered

Common Core 11 12
  • RL.11-12.1 — Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
  • RL.11-12.3 — Analyse the impact of the author's choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story (e.g. where a story is set, how the action is ordered, how the characters are introduced and developed).
  • RL.11-12.4 — Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyse the impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone.
  • RL.11-12.5 — Analyse how an author's choices concerning how to structure specific parts of a text contribute to its overall structure and meaning as well as its aesthetic impact.
  • RL.11-12.6 — Analyse a case in which grasping point of view requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g. satire, irony, understatement).
AP Literature
  • Literary Argumentation (LAN-1) — Develop a thesis that interprets a literary text and requires defence with evidence.
  • Figurative Language (FIG-1) — Explain the function of specific words and phrases, including extended metaphor and irony, in a literary text.
  • Narration (NAR-1) — Explain the function of point of view, including free indirect discourse, and its effect on the reader's interpretation of character.
  • Character (CHR-1) — Analyse how complex characters develop over the course of a text, interact with other characters, and advance the plot or develop the theme.
  • Structure (STR-1) — Explain how the sequence or juxtaposition of events or scenes contributes to the development of a literary argument.
AQA
  • AO1 — Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology, and coherent, accurate written expression.
  • AO2 — Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts, including Eliot's use of free indirect discourse, narratorial intrusion, and structural parallelism.
  • AO3 — Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which literary texts are written and received, including Victorian debates on women's education, the 1867 Reform Act, and the rise of professional medicine.
  • AO5 — Explore literary texts informed by different interpretations, including Henry James's view of the novel's 'loose structure' and Virginia Woolf's claim that it is written 'for grown-up people'.
Edexcel
  • AO1 — Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology and coherent, accurate written expression.
  • AO2 — Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts, with specific attention to Eliot's narrative voice, irony, and use of structural doubling across the Dorothea and Lydgate plot strands.
  • AO3 — Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which Middlemarch was written (1869–71) and received, including Victorian marriage law, women's intellectual life, and the reform debates of the 1860s–70s.
  • AO4 — Explore connections across literary texts, including comparison of Eliot's treatment of marriage with other Victorian realist fiction studied on the course.

Storgy generator

Plan it for your class instead

Choose the curriculum, the year group, how many lessons you have, and what the sequence should be about. Grounded in Storgy's analysis of Middlemarch.

Plan Middlemarch for your class1 credit
MiddlemarchGeorge Eliot

Powered by Claude. One credit per plan. First run free — no signup.