Skip to content
Storgy

Year 12–13 / Grades 11–12

Maus — a five-lesson scheme of work

This sequence begins by explaining how Spiegelman's dual timeline operates and the purpose of the animal metaphor. It then progresses through the increasing persecution in Chapters 4–6, the survival strategies presented in the Auschwitz chapters, and the metafictional crisis of Chapter 8, ultimately leading to the final lesson where students integrate their understanding of the entire work. By the conclusion, the class will be able to craft a well-supported analytical essay on how Spiegelman employs form, structure, and visual language to delve into themes of memory, guilt, and the ethics surrounding Holocaust representation.

Objectives

  • Analyse how Spiegelman uses the dual timeline structure in Chapters 1–3 to position Art as an unreliable and guilt-ridden narrator.
  • Explain how the visual metaphor of mice, cats and pigs operates across Chapters 4–6 to represent persecution, complicity and moral ambiguity.
  • Examine how Vladek's survival strategies in Chapters 7 and 9 reveal character and comment on the dehumanising logic of Auschwitz.
  • Evaluate how the metafictional interruptions in Chapter 8 ('Time Flies') interrogate the ethics and limits of Holocaust representation.
  • Write a sustained, evidenced analytical essay that tracks a single idea — memory, guilt, or form — across at least three chapters of Maus.

The sequence

  1. Lesson 1: Two Timelines, One Guilt: Structure and Narration in Chapters 1–3

    55 min · ch. 1, 2, 3
    Do now

    In the opening panel of Chapter 1, young Art slips on the ice and rushes to Vladek. Vladek reassures Art with a kind word, revealing a protective and caring dynamic between them, even before diving into the Holocaust narrative.

    Teacher input

    Model close reading on the final panel sequence of Chapter 2 (pages 23–24 in the Pantheon edition), where Art turns on his tape recorder and Vladek starts: 'It was 1935 or 6…' Highlight how the panel border — just a thin black line — is the sole divider between 1980s Rego Park and 1930s Sosnowiec. This visual choice emphasizes that Art's act of recording is deeply intertwined with Vladek's act of remembering. Point out the caption box ('Vladek started on the very beginning of things…') as Art's editorial voice cutting into his father's narrative, making it clear from the start that this memory is mediated and constructed rather than straightforward.

    Independent task

    Students will annotate a printed excerpt: the three-page section from Chapter 3 where Vladek, riding his exercise bike, recounts his experience as a prisoner of war in 1939. They need to pinpoint two instances where Art's present-tense framing—through caption boxes, panel borders, or his physical presence—clearly shapes or interrupts Vladek's past-tense account. Then, students should write a paragraph of 150–200 words explaining how Spiegelman employs these structural interruptions to highlight that all memory is mediated. The paragraph must include the term 'mediated' and quote at least one caption box word for word.

    Exit ticket

    In one sentence, explain why Spiegelman draws himself — Art in the present — inside the same panels as Vladek's wartime flashbacks rather than keeping the two timelines in separate panels throughout.

  2. Lesson 2: Tightening the Noose: The Animal Metaphor and Moral Ambiguity in Chapters 4–6

    55 min · ch. 4, 5, 6
    Do now

    In Chapter 4, Vladek recounts how Jews were compelled to wear armbands and surrender their valuables, while Spiegelman illustrates these characters as mice adorned with armbands. Representing actual Jewish victims as cartoon mice can highlight their vulnerability and innocence, but it risks trivializing their suffering and the gravity of their experiences.

    Teacher input

    Model a visual analysis of the page in Chapter 6 where Haskel — a Jewish 'mouse' — refuses to help Anja's relatives unless he gets paid. Notice how the panel composition places him behind a desk, adopting a pose reminiscent of the Nazi officers illustrated elsewhere in the chapter. Guide students to see how Spiegelman's visual rhyming (posture, framing, and the desk as a barrier) connects Haskel to the logic of exploitation, even though the narrative doesn't explicitly state this. This also complicates the mice/cats binary by demonstrating that being a victim doesn't automatically mean one is virtuous.

    Independent task

    Students are tasked with crafting a structured analytical paragraph of 180–220 words in response to this question: 'How does Spiegelman use the visual representation of Haskel in Chapter 6 to challenge a straightforward interpretation of the mice/cats metaphor?' The paragraph should feature a description of at least one specific panel, detailing elements in the foreground and background, as well as the positioning of characters. Additionally, it must include a quotation from Vladek's dialogue or a caption, alongside a clear analytical point regarding what the breakdown of the metaphor uncovers about collaboration and survival in the face of persecution.

    Exit ticket

    Name one character in Chapters 4–6 who is drawn as a mouse but behaves in a way that complicates the idea that mice simply represent innocent victims, and state in one sentence what their behaviour reveals.

  3. Lesson 3: Survival as Skill: Vladek's Agency and Identity in Auschwitz (Chapters 7 and 9)

    55 min · ch. 7, 9
    Do now

    By starting the Auschwitz section with Vladek's description of the selection process, Spiegelman underscores the brutal loss of individual identity that prisoners faced upon arrival. This immediate focus on dehumanization sets the tone for the harrowing experiences that follow, emphasizing how the Holocaust stripped away personal histories and reduced people to mere numbers.

    Teacher input

    Model a character analysis based on the passage in Chapter 9 where Vladek teaches English to a Kapo in exchange for better rations and protection. Guide students in exploring how Spiegelman's artistic choice—depicting Vladek standing upright and gesturing like a teacher while the Kapo sits—temporarily shifts the power dynamic within the camp. Discuss how Vladek's line ('I could speak English, Polish, German, Yiddish…') serves as a list of survival tools rather than a mere boast. Show students how to interpret the interplay of image and text: Vladek's posture and his verbal catalog work together to portray him as someone who transforms language into a form of currency.

    Independent task

    Using evidence from Chapters 7 and 9, students should write 200–250 words in response to the question: 'To what extent does Spiegelman depict Vladek's survival at Auschwitz as a result of individual skill rather than luck?' Students need to reference at least two specific survival strategies that Vladek uses (such as his English lessons, tinsmithing work, or bartering). They should quote or closely paraphrase Vladek's words at least once and conclude with a sentence that recognizes a counter-argument — a moment where luck, rather than skill, influences the outcome.

    Exit ticket

    Write one sentence explaining how the visual composition of any single panel in Chapter 7 or Chapter 9 shows that Vladek retains a form of identity or agency despite the camp's systematic attempt to erase both.

  4. Lesson 4: 'I'm Tired of Being a Cartoonist': Metafiction and the Ethics of Representation in Chapter 8

    55 min · ch. 8
    Do now

    Chapter 8 opens with Art perched on his drawing board, surrounded by a heap of mouse corpses, as journalists and cameras close in on him. By placing himself in this unsettling scene, Spiegelman may be confronting the grim realities of his subject matter, while the choice to introduce a chapter on Auschwitz in such a visceral way underscores the stark horror and weight of the history he is about to explore.

    Teacher input

    Model a close reading of the two-page sequence in Chapter 8 where Art visits his psychiatrist, Pavel, a Holocaust survivor depicted as a mouse. During this session, Pavel asks, "Maybe you need to show it was also random and pointless… the victims who died were not better or worse than those who survived." Use this exchange to illustrate how Spiegelman is confronting his own artistic and ethical dilemmas within the narrative. Pavel's words serve as both therapy and a critique of redemptive Holocaust narratives. Furthermore, since Pavel is also a mouse-survivor, Art is essentially being challenged by the very community whose story he is attempting to tell.

    Independent task

    Students are tasked with writing a 200–250 word analytical response to the following prompt: "In what ways does Spiegelman employ metafictional sequences in Chapter 8 to challenge the notion of whether any depiction of the Holocaust — including Maus itself — can be deemed adequate or ethical?" In their responses, students should reference at least two specific metafictional elements (such as Art's drawing on the pile of corpses, the real fly appearing in the panels, the dialogue with Pavel, or the transition to photographs of the actual Vladek and Anja). They need to discuss how each device affects the reader's connection to the text and finish with a sentence that clearly states their position on whether Spiegelman finds a resolution to the ethical dilemma he presents.

    Exit ticket

    In two sentences, explain what the real fly buzzing through the panels of Chapter 8 contributes to Spiegelman's argument about the limits of comic-book representation — and why a drawn fly would not have achieved the same effect.

  5. Lesson 5: Synthesis Essay: Memory, Guilt and Form Across the Whole Work (Chapters 1–11)

    60 min · ch. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    Do now

    The last image of Maus features Vladek's gravestone, which bears both his name and Anja's, along with Art Spiegelman's signature and the years '1978–1991'. Spiegelman likely chooses to conclude with his signature and those dates to emphasize his personal connection to the narrative and the lasting impact of the story, rather than simply ending with Vladek's final words or a scene of reunion among survivors.

    Teacher input

    Model the essay's opening move on the closing pages of Chapter 11, where Vladek mistakenly calls Art 'Richieu'—confusing his living son with his deceased one—before he falls asleep. Teach students how to craft an essay introduction that pinpoints a specific formal feature (in this case, the name substitution across the panel gutter), links it to a theme (the dead replacing the living in memory; the concept of guilt as an inheritance), and establishes a clear argument. For instance, Spiegelman portrays memory not as something that preserves but as something that distorts, making this distortion the book's central theme. Show how the introduction should outline the formal feature, its effect, and the interpretive claim in that sequence.

    Independent task

    Write a comprehensive analytical essay of 600–750 words in response to the following question: "How does Spiegelman use the relationship between Art and Vladek to explore the idea that guilt is inherited across generations?" Your essay should:

    1. Begin with an introduction that presents a clear, arguable claim regarding how the father-son relationship is portrayed across the dual timeline.
    2. Develop at least three body paragraphs, each focused on a specific moment from a different chapter — ensure you include at least one moment from Chapters 1–3, one from Chapters 4–7 or 9, and one from Chapters 8, 10, or 11.
    3. Incorporate at least four direct quotations or detailed panel descriptions, followed by an analysis of the language or visual elements used.
    4. Address the counter-argument that suggests Art's guilt is self-indulgent or detracts from Vladek's story.
    5. Conclude by revisiting the central question — what insights does the graphic novel format uniquely provide about inherited guilt that a prose memoir could not convey?
    Exit ticket

    Read back your concluding sentence. Does it make a claim about the graphic novel form specifically — not just about guilt or memory in general — and if it does not, rewrite it in the space below so that it does, explaining in one additional sentence why form matters to your argument.

Activities

Panel Border Timeline Mapping 30 min · pairs

Each pair gets a printed sheet featuring six panels from Chapters 1–3 where the present and past timelines overlap—for instance, when Art turns on the tape recorder in Chapter 2. Partners mark each panel border using different colors: red for the 'present-tense frame' and blue for the 'past-tense content.' They also write three sentences detailing how the border, as a formal device, acts as a metaphor for the divide between Art's generation and Vladek's. Finally, pairs return the annotated sheet along with their three sentences.

The Metaphor Audit: Who Gets Which Animal and Why? 25 min · groups

Groups of three will get a list of twelve characters from Maus — including Vladek, Anja, Haskel, Françoise, Tosha, Mandelbaum, and some unnamed Nazi officers — and they need to note which animal represents each character while also suggesting a reason why Spiegelman chose that animal. Afterward, groups will pick the character whose animal representation they find most surprising or troubling and write a two-sentence justification for their choice. Each group will then submit their completed table along with their two-sentence justification.

Survival Strategy Ranking 20 min · groups

Groups of four will get a list of eight survival strategies that Vladek uses in Chapters 7 and 9 — such as teaching English, tinsmithing, bartering for bread, and memorizing the guards' routines. They will rank these strategies from 'most reliant on Vladek's personal skill' to 'most reliant on luck or circumstance' and write a sentence explaining why they chose their top-ranked strategy. The ranked list along with the justification sentence should be submitted to the teacher on a single sheet.

Metafiction Freeze-Frame 35 min · pairs

Each pair should choose one metafictional moment from Chapter 8 — whether it's the corpse pile, the fly, the conversation with Pavel, or the shift to photographs — and write a 100-word explanation of how this device affects the reader's relationship with the text. They need to address whether this moment increases or decreases the reader's trust in Spiegelman and provide reasons for their answer. Partners will submit a single written response that includes both of their names.

Vladek's Voice vs. Art's Voice: A Dialogue Transcript 40 min · individual

Students select any two-page spread from Chapters 4–6 that includes both Vladek's dialogue and Art's caption boxes. They will transcribe all the text into two columns—'Vladek speaks' and 'Art frames'—and then annotate each column with a single word that captures the tone (e.g., 'pragmatic', 'guilty', 'ironic'). Below the transcript, students write two sentences discussing whose account of events the reader is encouraged to trust more, and why. The annotated transcript along with the two sentences is submitted.

The Final Panel Close Reading 30 min · whole class

The teacher displays the last page of Chapter 11 — featuring Vladek's gravestone panel and Spiegelman's signature — without any comments. For five minutes, students write on their own, reflecting on Spiegelman's formal choices on this page (thinking about framing, text, image, and any omissions), and what these choices suggest about the connection between art, memory, and loss. After that, the teacher collects three responses before students update their replies based on the discussion. They submit both the original and the revised versions.

Assessment

  • Lesson 1 exit ticket checks whether students can articulate why the dual-timeline structure is a formal argument about mediated memory, not merely a narrative convenience.
  • Lesson 2 annotated paragraph checks whether students can read a visual composition — panel framing, character posture, spatial positioning — as evidence, not just illustration.
  • Lesson 3 exit ticket checks whether students can identify a specific panel and connect its visual grammar to a claim about identity or agency under dehumanising conditions.
  • Lesson 4 analytical response checks whether students can distinguish between a metafictional device and a thematic statement, and can take a position on an ethical question raised by the text.
  • Lesson 5 exit-ticket self-revision checks whether students can evaluate their own concluding sentence against a specific criterion — the presence of a claim about graphic novel form — and rewrite it if it fails that criterion.

Summative task

Write a full analytical essay of 600–750 words in response to the following question: 'How does Spiegelman use the relationship between Art and Vladek to explore the idea that guilt is inherited across generations?' Your essay must open with a clear, arguable claim; develop at least three body paragraphs each grounded in a specific moment from a different chapter of Maus; use at least four direct quotations or precise panel descriptions with analysis; address the counter-argument that Art's guilt is self-indulgent; and conclude by explaining what the graphic novel form — specifically — allows Spiegelman to say about inherited guilt that prose memoir could not.

Marking notes

Top-band responses present a clear and detailed argument about how the graphic novel format — including elements like panel borders, caption boxes, visual metaphors, and metafictional intrusions — shapes the theme of inherited guilt, rather than viewing the form as mere decoration. Mid-band responses point out relevant moments and provide accurate quotes, but they analyze language or imagery without linking these formal choices to the thematic argument. Lower-band responses merely summarize the interactions between Art and Vladek without exploring how Spiegelman builds that relationship, or they treat the animal metaphor as straightforward rather than as a debated stylistic choice.

Standards covered

Common Core 11 12
  • RL.11-12.1 — Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
  • RL.11-12.5 — Analyse how an author's choices concerning how to structure specific parts of a text contribute to its overall structure and meaning as well as its aesthetic impact.
  • RL.11-12.6 — Analyse a case in which grasping point of view requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant.
  • W.11-12.1 — Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
AP Literature
  • Literary Argumentation (LAN-1) — Explain the function of word choice, imagery, and other figurative language in a literary text.
  • Structure (STR-1) — Explain how the sequence and arrangement of parts of a text contribute to its meaning.
  • Narration (NAR-1) — Explain how a narrator's or speaker's perspective controls and limits what the reader knows.
  • Character (CHR-1) — Explain the function of a character changing or remaining unchanged in a literary text.
  • Literary Argumentation (LAN-1.E) — Develop a thesis that makes a defensible claim about an interpretation of literature and that may establish a line of reasoning.
AQA
  • AO1 — Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology, and coherent, accurate written expression.
  • AO2 — Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts, including the effects of language, form and structure.
  • AO3 — Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which literary texts are written and received.
  • AO4 — Explore connections across literary texts, including the ways in which texts relate to each other and to literary traditions.
IB Lit
  • Criterion A — Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the text, including its context and the author's choices of form, structure and language.
  • Criterion B — Analyse and evaluate the ways in which form, structure and language shape meaning.
  • Criterion C — Develop a focused and well-supported literary argument, using evidence from the text.
Edexcel
  • AO1 — Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology and coherent, accurate written expression.
  • AO2 — Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts.
  • AO3 — Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which literary texts are written and received.

Storgy generator

Plan it for your class instead

Choose the curriculum, the year group, how many lessons you have, and what the sequence should be about. Grounded in Storgy's analysis of Maus.

Plan Maus for your class1 credit
MausArt Spiegelman

Powered by Claude. One credit per plan. First run free — no signup.