Year 12–13 / Grades 11–12
King Lear — A Five-Lesson Scheme of Work
This five-lesson sequence takes students through King Lear in chronological order, starting with a close reading of the love-test in Act I and culminating in an independent analysis of the play's tragic ending in Act V. Initially, students practice interpreting Shakespeare's language for both meaning and dramatic impact. They then explore the parallel downfalls of Lear and Gloucester across Acts II–IV and finally pull together their insights on justice, power, and loss in a concluding analytical essay. By the end, the class will be able to construct a well-supported argument about how Shakespeare employs language, form, and structure to illustrate the breakdown of authority and the collapse of natural relationships.
Objectives
- Analyse how Shakespeare uses the love-test in Act I Scene 1 to establish the themes of power, flattery, and Lear's fatal misjudgement.
- Explain how Edmund's soliloquy in Act I Scene 2 constructs him as a villain who exposes the arbitrariness of legitimacy.
- Analyse how Shakespeare uses the storm in Act III Scenes 2 and 4 to externalise Lear's psychological disintegration.
- Trace how the parallel blinding of Gloucester in Act III Scene 7 and the mock trial in Act III Scene 6 develop the theme of justice as corrupt and absent.
- Write a sustained, evidenced analytical paragraph that makes an argument about power or identity in King Lear, selecting and embedding quotations precisely.
- Evaluate how Shakespeare's structural choice to kill Cordelia in Act V Scene 3 challenges conventional tragic form and denies the audience consolation.
The sequence
Lesson 1: The Love-Test: Power, Flattery, and Lear's Fatal Division (Act I)
60 min · ch. 1- Do now
Lear is asking his daughters to declare their love for him in exchange for their inheritance. The word 'darker' implies that his true motives may be driven by selfishness and a desire for power rather than genuine affection.
- Teacher input
Model a close reading of Cordelia's aside, "What shall Cordelia speak? Love, and be silent" (Act I Scene 1), alongside Goneril's opening declaration, "Sir, I love you more than words can wield the matter." Highlight for students how the difference in register—Goneril's exaggerated, complex rhetoric compared to Cordelia's simple restraint—illustrates the play's key warning that language can corrupt power. Annotate live on the board: diction, syntax, dramatic irony.
- Independent task
Students will write one analytical paragraph using the PEEL structure to answer the question: "How does Shakespeare use language in Act I Scene 1 to show that Lear's love test is dangerous?" They need to include quotes from both Goneril's declaration and Cordelia's "Nothing, my lord" exchange, ensuring that the quotations are embedded grammatically within their analysis. The focus should be on making a clear argument rather than just listing observations. This paragraph will be submitted at the end of the lesson for teacher feedback.
- Exit ticket
Cordelia's 'Nothing' is dramatically powerful because it creates a stark contrast between her honesty and the deceit of those around her, highlighting the irony of her sincerity in a world filled with falsehoods.
Lesson 2: Edmund and the 'Bastard' Speech: Constructing the Villain (Act I–II)
60 min · ch. 1, 2- Do now
Read Edmund's soliloquy opening: 'Thou, Nature, art my goddess; to thy law / My services are bound.' Without looking it up, share your interpretation of what Edmund means by 'Nature' in this context. Is it the same Nature that Lear calls upon when he curses Goneril in Act I Scene 4? Identify one similarity and one difference between the two references.
- Teacher input
Model how to read a soliloquy as a rhetorical performance using Edmund's 'Why bastard? wherefore base?' speech (Act I Scene 2, lines 6–22). Pay attention to the repeated use of 'Why' and 'Wherefore', the sarcastic imitation of the language used by legitimate society when he refers to 'legitimate Edgar', and how Edmund speaks directly to the audience to draw them into his perspective. Help students understand that the form of the soliloquy serves as an argument reflecting Edmund's feelings of isolation and his sense of self-reliance.
- Independent task
Students will annotate a printed extract of Edmund's full soliloquy (Act I Scene 2, lines 1–22) and then write two analytical paragraphs. The first paragraph should explore how Shakespeare employs language to portray Edmund's grievance as both persuasive and threatening. The second paragraph will focus on how the soliloquy form influences the audience's perspective. Each paragraph must present a clear argument and include at least two embedded quotations. The annotated extract and the paragraphs will be submitted together.
- Exit ticket
Edmund's repeated use of the word 'legitimate' suggests he is seeking validation for his actions or desires.
Lesson 3: Storm and Madness: Lear on the Heath (Act III)
60 min · ch. 3- Do now
Look at these two lines from Act III Scene 2: 'Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! rage! blow!' and 'I am a man / More sinned against than sinning.' Without looking ahead, predict: is Lear going mad, or is he gaining self-knowledge? Write three lines justifying your view using only these two quotes.
Lear's command to the winds suggests he is losing touch with reality, indicating madness as he rages against nature. However, when he asserts he is "more sinned against than sinning," it shows a deeper understanding of his victimhood, hinting at self-awareness. This duality raises the question: is he spiraling into madness, or is he finally confronting the truth about his suffering?
- Teacher input
Model how to analyze structure and imagery together using Lear's speech to the storm, Act III Scene 2, lines 1–9. The imperative verbs ('Blow', 'rage', 'crack') initially portray Lear as still commanding — he addresses the storm as if it were a subject. However, the fractured syntax and the shift to self-pity in 'More sinned against than sinning' illustrate the collapse of his authority mid-speech. Show how to discuss form (the broken verse line) as supporting evidence.
- Independent task
Students will read Act III Scene 4, lines 26–36 (Poor Tom's entrance: 'Away! the foul fiend follows me!') on their own, then compose a structured response to the question: 'How does Shakespeare use the meeting between Lear and Poor Tom in Act III Scene 4 to develop the theme of identity?' They should analyze at least one moment of Lear's reaction to Edgar-as-Tom ('Is man no more than this?') and relate it to Lear's earlier view of himself as king. Responses will be assessed.
- Exit ticket
The storm in Act III Scene 2 reflects Lear's chaotic emotional state, as his raging anger mirrors the violent winds and tumultuous weather surrounding him.
Lesson 4: Blinding Gloucester and the Mock Trial: Justice Inverted (Act III–IV)
60 min · ch. 3, 4- Do now
Read Cornwall's line before blinding Gloucester: "Upon these eyes of thine I'll set my foot" (Act III Scene 7). And read Gloucester's: "I shall see / The wingèd vengeance overtake such children." Write: who do you think has the better understanding of justice in this play so far? Use one other moment from Acts I–III to support your view.
- Teacher input
Model how to read a scene for structural irony using the mock trial in Act III, Scene 6, where Lear puts Goneril and Regan on trial before Edgar-as-Poor-Tom and the Fool acting as 'judges'. Notice how Shakespeare positions this scene right before Gloucester's blinding in Scene 7—this mock 'trial' is just a mad fantasy, while the actual brutal punishment occurs offstage without any legal procedure. Compare the stage direction 'They pluck out his eyes' with Lear's line 'Let them anatomize Regan.'
- Independent task
Students will write a comparative analytical paragraph responding to the question: "How does Shakespeare portray justice as either absent or corrupted in Act III Scenes 6 and 7?" They need to reference the mock trial and the blinding scene, include at least three quotations, and present an argument regarding Shakespeare's views on power and justice—rather than just summarizing the events. The paragraphs will be collected for written feedback.
- Exit ticket
Shakespeare may have placed the mock trial and the blinding in the same act to heighten the tension and emphasize the theme of justice versus injustice. By juxtaposing these events, he creates a powerful contrast between the absurdity of the trial and the horror of the blinding, underscoring the tragic consequences of the characters' actions.
Lesson 5: Cordelia's Death and the Refusal of Consolation (Act V)
60 min · ch. 5- Do now
Read Kent's final lines: 'I have a journey, sir, shortly to go; / My master calls me, I must not say no' (Act V Scene 3). And Albany's: 'The weight of this sad time we must obey.' Write: does the ending of King Lear feel like justice to you? One sentence claim, two sentences of reasoning — no quotation required yet.
The ending of King Lear does not feel like justice. Instead, it evokes a sense of tragedy and loss, leaving the audience to grapple with the harsh realities of fate and the consequences of betrayal. The characters' suffering seems disproportionate to their actions, suggesting that justice remains elusive in this world.
- Teacher input
Model how to write about tragic form using Lear's entrance with Cordelia's body: "Howl, howl, howl, howl! O, you are men of stones" (Act V Scene 3, lines 257–259). The repetition of "Howl" — a raw, inarticulate sound rather than a word aimed at anyone — disrupts the typical conventions of tragic resolution. In contrast, Nahum Tate's 1681 adaptation, where Cordelia survives, illustrates that Shakespeare's choice deliberately rejects the possibility of consolation. This can be framed as a formal argument, highlighting the intentional structural choices that emphasize despair over redemption.
- Independent task
Students will compose a complete analytical response (three paragraphs, roughly 300 words) to the prompt: 'How does Shakespeare use Act V Scene 3 to explore the theme of loss and grief?' They need to analyze Lear's 'Howl' speech, his lines over Cordelia's body ('She's gone for ever… / She's dead as earth'), and the play's final couplet delivered by Edgar or Albany. Each paragraph should begin with a clear argument rather than focusing on context or plot points. These responses will serve as the summative draft.
- Exit ticket
It’s significant that Edgar, the character who survived by feigning madness, delivers the final lines of the play because it highlights the theme of perception versus reality and underscores the irony of sanity in a world gone mad.
Activities
Love-Test Hot-Seating: Goneril, Regan, and Cordelia in the Dock 20 min · whole class
Three volunteers sit at the front as Goneril, Regan, and Cordelia right after the love-test (Act I Scene 1). The class prepares two questions each from the viewpoints of Lear, Kent, or France. Students in the hot seat must respond in character, using the text as their guide. After ten minutes, the class votes on whose answer felt the most honest and whose was the most impactful. Finally, students submit a written sentence reflecting on the difference between truth and power in the scene.
Edmund vs. Edgar: Parallel Soliloquy Annotation Race 25 min · pairs
Each pair gets two printed extracts side by side: Edmund's "Thou, Nature, art my goddess" (Act I Scene 2) and Edgar's "I heard myself proclaimed" soliloquy (Act II Scene 3). They have fifteen minutes to annotate both extracts for language, tone, and each character's views on identity and legitimacy. Afterward, they write a single sentence comparing the two. Finally, pairs return their annotated double-extract sheet with the comparative sentence included at the bottom.
Storm Tableau: Staging Act III Scene 2 30 min · groups
Groups of four will work on Act III Scene 2 (lines 1–36: Lear, the Fool, Kent, and the storm). They have fifteen minutes to create a frozen tableau capturing three moments from the extract, determining each character's position, their body language, and what that staging reveals about power dynamics. After presenting their tableaux, the class will discuss which staging choices most effectively reflect the language used. Each student will then write two sentences explaining one staging decision in relation to the text.
Justice Spectrum: Ranking Moments of Punishment and Reward 20 min · groups
Groups receive eight cards, each representing a moment of punishment or reward in the play: Cordelia disinherited (Act I), Edgar exiled (Act II), Gloucester blinded (Act III), Edmund promoted (Act II), Lear abandoned in the storm (Act III), Edmund defeated in trial by combat (Act V), Cordelia hanged (Act V), Goneril and Regan dead (Act V). They arrange the cards along a spectrum from 'just' to 'unjust' and must come to a consensus on which moments belong at the top and bottom. Each group then returns their ranked order along with a brief justification for their most controversial placement.
Nahum Tate vs. Shakespeare: Close Reading the Two Endings 25 min · pairs
Pairs get a printed excerpt from Nahum Tate's 1681 adaptation (where Cordelia survives and reunites with Edgar) along with Act V Scene 3, lines 257–310 of Shakespeare's original text. They make annotations on both, focusing on tone, imagery, and the implications of each ending regarding justice. Afterward, pairs compose a single analytical sentence that starts with: 'Shakespeare's decision to kill Cordelia is more powerful than Tate's revision because…' They then submit the sentence and their annotated extracts.
Fool's Exit: What Happened to the Fool? 15 min · individual
Students learn that the Fool vanishes after Act III Scene 6 without any clear reason, and Lear's line 'And my poor fool is hanged' (Act V Scene 3) could refer to him, though it's uncertain. Working on their own, students will write a paragraph discussing whether the Fool's disappearance represents a structural flaw, a purposeful ambiguity, or a significant dramatic decision. They are required to include at least one line spoken by the Fool from Acts I–III to back up their argument. Once complete, paragraphs are submitted.
Assessment
- Exit ticket Lesson 1: checks whether students can articulate the dramatic function of Cordelia's 'Nothing' as contrast and irony, not merely paraphrase it.
- Exit ticket Lesson 2: checks whether students can read repetition ('legitimate') as a window onto character desire, not just label it as a technique.
- Exit ticket Lesson 3: checks whether students can connect a specific structural feature (broken verse line or storm imagery) to Lear's psychological state without prompting.
- Exit ticket Lesson 4: checks whether students can articulate structural irony — the juxtaposition of the mock trial and the blinding — as an argument about justice, not a plot summary.
- Exit ticket Lesson 5: checks whether students can read the choice of final speaker (Edgar) as a meaningful structural decision, connecting it to his arc across the play.
- Lesson 4 paragraph (collected for written feedback): checks whether students can sustain a comparative argument across two scenes, embedding quotation grammatically and avoiding narrative retelling.
Summative task
Write a response of about 300 words to the following question: 'How does Shakespeare use Act V Scene 3 to explore the theme of loss and grief?' Your response should be structured into three paragraphs, each starting with a distinct argument. Analyze Lear's 'Howl, howl, howl, howl' speech, his lines spoken over Cordelia's body, and the play's closing lines. Integrate your quotations smoothly and discuss the impact of particular words and structural choices — avoid simply recounting the plot.
Marking notes
``json { "Top band": "The argument is consistently developed throughout all three paragraphs. Quotations from 'Howl', the Cordelia-body speech, and the closing lines are integrated and examined closely at the word level. The structural choices, such as the four-part 'Howl' and the fragmented syntax in 'She's gone for ever', are interpreted as significant forms.", "Mid band": "The argument is present but lacks consistency. Quotations are chosen effectively but are sometimes inserted without proper integration. The effects of these quotations are discussed, though they aren't always linked to specific language choices.", "Lower band": "The response mainly tells a narrative. Quotations are listed rather than analyzed thoroughly. 'Loss and grief' are presented as topics to describe rather than claims to argue." } ``
Standards covered
- Common Core 11 12
- RL.11-12.1 — Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
- RL.11-12.3 — Analyse the impact of the author's choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama (e.g. where a scene is set, how the action is ordered, how the characters are introduced and developed).
- RL.11-12.4 — Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyse the impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone.
- RL.11-12.5 — Analyse how an author's choices concerning how to structure specific parts of a text contribute to its overall structure and meaning as well as its aesthetic impact.
- W.11-12.1 — Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
- AP Literature
- Literary Argumentation (LAN-1) — Explain the function of specific words and phrases in a literary text and how they contribute to meaning.
- Character (CHR-1) — Analyse how Shakespeare develops Lear, Edmund, Cordelia, and Gloucester through dialogue, soliloquy, and dramatic juxtaposition.
- Structure (STR-1) — Explain how the structural choice to juxtapose the mock trial (III.6) with the blinding (III.7) and to end with Cordelia's death (V.3) contributes to the play's meaning.
- Figurative Language (FIG-1) — Analyse how Shakespeare's storm imagery and the 'Howl' speech function as extended metaphors for psychological and political disintegration.
- Literary and Intellectual History (LIT-1) — Situate King Lear within the context of Jacobean debates about sovereignty and the conventions of Shakespearean tragic form.
- AQA
- AO1 — Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology, and coherent, accurate written expression.
- AO2 — Analyse the language, form and structure used by a writer to create meanings and effects, using relevant subject terminology where appropriate.
- AO3 — Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which literary texts are written and received (Jacobean court performance, Nahum Tate's adaptation, Romantic reappraisal).
- AO5 — Explore literary texts informed by different interpretations (e.g. Coleridge and Hazlitt on Lear's madness; critical debate on the Quarto vs. Folio texts).
- Edexcel
- AO1 — Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology and coherent, accurate written expression.
- AO2 — Analyse the language, form and structure used by a writer to create meanings and effects, using relevant subject terminology.
- AO3 — Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which literary texts are written and received.
- AO4 — Explore connections across literary texts, including the relationship between King Lear and its source texts (The True Chronicle History of King Leir, Sidney's Arcadia) and Tate's adaptation.
Storgy generator
Plan it for your class instead
Choose the curriculum, the year group, how many lessons you have, and what the sequence should be about. Grounded in Storgy's analysis of King Lear.
Teacher tools for
King Lear
Discussion Questions
Socratic, thematic, and close-reading prompts, ready to ask.
Essay Prompts
Exam-style essay questions with assessment-objective focus.
Quiz Questions
Multiple-choice comprehension checks, ready to hand out.
Work Q&A
Ask anything about the text and get a grounded answer.
Full study guide
Summaries, characters, themes, and key quotes.