Skip to content
Storgy

Year 12–13 / Grades 11–12

Hedda Gabler — a five-lesson scheme of work

This sequence takes students from their first encounter with Ibsen's play to the point of crafting independent critical writing through each of the four acts. Lesson 1 highlights Hedda's sense of entrapment as revealed in the drawing-room setting of Act I. Lesson 2 delves into themes of power and manipulation during the pivotal pistol and Brack scenes in Act II. Lesson 3 focuses on Hedda's deliberate act of will, marked by the destruction of the manuscript in Act III. Lesson 4 looks at how Brack's blackmail leads to the breakdown of Hedda's will and ultimately her suicide in Act IV. Finally, Lesson 5 brings everything together, allowing students to write an analytical essay that argues how Ibsen portrays Hedda as a character crushed by the constraints of gendered society.

Objectives

  • Analyse how Ibsen uses stage directions, setting, and dialogue in Act I to establish Hedda's aristocratic identity and her sense of suffocation within the Tesman household.
  • Explain how Ibsen constructs the power dynamic between Hedda and Judge Brack in Act II, using the pistol-loading scene and the 'triangle' speech as specific textual evidence.
  • Evaluate how the burning of Lövborg's manuscript in Act III functions simultaneously as an act of control, jealousy, and self-destruction, supporting the argument with close language analysis.
  • Trace how Ibsen systematically closes every exit available to Hedda across Acts III and IV, showing how Brack's blackmail and Lövborg's undignified death destroy her final fantasy.
  • Write a sustained, evidenced analytical essay that constructs an argument about gender, freedom, and power in Hedda Gabler, selecting and embedding quotations from at least three acts.

The sequence

  1. Lesson 1: The Cage is Gilded: Hedda's World in Act I

    60 min · ch. 1
    Do now

    Look at the stage direction that opens Act I: Ibsen provides a detailed description of the drawing room — the flowers, the portrait of General Gabler, the piano. Without any direct information about the characters, write three inferences about the kind of woman who resides here and what she values. One of your inferences should use the word 'suggests.'

    Teacher input

    Model a close reading of the exchange between Aunt Julie and Bertha that opens Act I (from 'MISS TESMAN: Well, here we are, Bertha' to Hedda's first entrance). Highlight how Ibsen captures Aunt Julie's excited pride in the villa, Bertha's nervousness about 'the mistress,' and the details surrounding General Gabler's portrait to shape Hedda's social identity even before she speaks. Illustrate how to incorporate a short quotation and analyze its impact—for instance, the portrait 'looming' over the domestic space suggests that Hedda's aristocratic background overshadows a bourgeois life she never chose.

    Independent task

    Students will read from Hedda's initial entrance to the conclusion of her discussion with Aunt Julie regarding the hat (Act I). Following this, they will compose a fully developed PEEL paragraph that responds to the question: 'How does Ibsen portray Hedda as feeling out of place in the Tesman household in Act I?' Students need to include at least two quotations—one from the stage directions and another from the dialogue—and explain what each quotation reveals about the conflict between Hedda's aristocratic self-image and her new domestic role. The paragraph should be between 150 and 200 words and will be submitted for written feedback.

    Exit ticket

    In two sentences, explain what the detail of General Gabler's portrait hanging in the Tesman drawing room tells us about Hedda's relationship to her past, and why Ibsen places it there at the very start of the play.

  2. Lesson 2: The Triangle and the Pistol: Power in Act II

    60 min · ch. 2
    Do now

    Act II begins with Hedda loading one of her father's pistols. Write down: (a) one reason a playwright might opt for this opening image instead of, for example, Hedda reading or playing the piano, and (b) one question this image raises that you want answered by the end of the act. You have four minutes — no discussion yet.

    Teacher input

    Model analysis of the exchange between Hedda and Brack in "So You Want to Be the Only Cock in the Yard" to Brack’s description of the “triangle” arrangement (Act II). Ibsen uses Brack’s hunting metaphor and Hedda’s sardonic responses to highlight a power negotiation masked as social banter. In your analysis, consider the dramatic irony: Brack thinks he’s granting Hedda freedom; meanwhile, the audience knows he’s setting a trap. Pay attention to Brack’s verb choices—like “a trusted friend” and “come and go”—and how they reflect the language of the cage that Hedda is already trapped in.

    Independent task

    Students should re-read the section of Act II starting from when Lövborg arrives with Thea, up until the moment Hedda gives him the manuscript and encourages him to 'do it beautifully.' This moment subtly hints at the first pistol offer even before Act III. They are tasked with writing a structured response of 200–250 words to the question: 'How does Ibsen portray Hedda's relationship with Eilert Lövborg as a struggle for power in Act II?' In their answers, students must reference at least one moment that includes Thea Elvsted and describe how her presence alters the dynamic between Hedda and Lövborg. The responses will be peer-reviewed based on the success criteria displayed on the board before being submitted to the teacher.

    Exit ticket

    Write one sentence identifying what Brack's 'triangle' speech reveals about his intentions towards Hedda, and one sentence explaining how Hedda's pistol-loading at the opening of Act II foreshadows the play's ending.

  3. Lesson 3: The Child in the Fire: Manuscript and Destruction in Act III

    60 min · ch. 3
    Do now

    Before we start the play, let's reflect on this: Hedda refers to Lövborg's manuscript as 'your child and Thea Elvsted's child'. Take a moment to list all the reasons you can think of—based on what you've read so far—why she might choose that particular word. Consider what Hedda lacks, what she feels she can't achieve, and what she holds against Thea. You have five minutes.

    Teacher input

    Model a close reading of the manuscript-burning scene in Act III, specifically from 'HEDDA goes to one of the stoves and opens it' to 'I am burning your child, Thea! — Burning it, curly-locks!' Explore how Ibsen condenses themes of jealousy, thwarted ambition, and displaced violence into a single dramatic action. Examine the stove's role—a domestic space associated with women—as the setting for Hedda's most rebellious act. Highlight the transition from the third person ('your child') to direct address ('curly-locks') as a sign of Hedda's psychological breakdown and her resentment towards Thea's creative bond with Lövborg.

    Independent task

    Students will read from Tesman's return with the manuscript at the beginning of Act III until the end of the burning scene. They are required to write a 200–250 word analytical paragraph addressing the question: "How does Ibsen make the burning of Lövborg's manuscript the dramatic and thematic climax of Act III?" In their analysis, students should examine the stage direction that describes the burning, the phrase "I am burning your child," and reference at least one earlier moment in Act III (such as Tesman's guilty confession to Hedda about finding the manuscript or Hedda's choice to hide it) that contributes to the sense of inevitability surrounding the burning. Completed paragraphs should be submitted at the door.

    Exit ticket

    In no more than three sentences, explain why Hedda calls the manuscript Lövborg and Thea's 'child' and what this word choice reveals about her own sense of what has been denied to her.

  4. Lesson 4: Every Door Locked: Blackmail and Death in Act IV

    60 min · ch. 4
    Do now

    At the start of Act IV, the drawing room is draped in black crepe as a sign of mourning for Aunt Rina's death, and Hedda is dressed in black as well. This visual detail suggests that Hedda's own fate may be intertwined with death and despair, while I believe that Tesman is most responsible for Hedda's situation by this point, as his complacency and inability to understand her needs contribute to her sense of entrapment.

    Teacher input

    Model Analysis

    In Act IV, Brack tells Hedda that the pistol found at Mademoiselle Diana's is identified as hers. This moment marks a significant shift in the power dynamics between them. Initially introduced in Act II as a symbol of Hedda's control, the pistol now becomes the means through which she is dominated.

    Ibsen expertly tracks the symbolism of the pistol throughout the play, showing how its meaning transforms. When Hedda says she is "dependent on your will and your demands," the language of ownership parallels Brack's earlier "triangle" speech in Act II. This connection highlights the inversion of power, as what once represented Hedda's autonomy now signifies her entrapment under Brack's authority.

    Independent task

    Students will read from Brack's revelation of blackmail to Hedda's final exit into the inner room and the gunshot that concludes the play. They will then write a response of 200–250 words to the question: "How does Ibsen present Hedda's suicide at the end of Act IV as both an act of defeat and an act of defiance?" In their responses, students should discuss Brack's blackmail, Lövborg's undignified death ("shot himself — in the groin — at Mademoiselle Diana's"), and the stage direction that describes Hedda's final action. They should explain how each of these details influences the audience's understanding of her death. Once collected, the responses will be returned with written feedback before Lesson 5.

    Exit ticket

    Write a full sentence explaining why Tesman's final line — that he and Thea will reconstruct Lövborg's manuscript from her notes — is a dramatically cruel ending for Hedda, even though Hedda is already dead when it is spoken.

  5. Lesson 5: Constructing the Argument: A Full Essay on Hedda Gabler

    60 min · ch. 1, 2, 3, 4
    Do now

    Take a moment to review the four paragraphs you've written throughout this unit. Highlight the strongest sentence in each one — the one that showcases your analysis at its best. These four sentences will form the backbone of your essay today. Spend four minutes on this task quietly; you'll use these sentences to craft your topic sentences.

    Teacher input

    Model how to craft an essay introduction that presents a controlling argument instead of just summarizing the plot, using the question students are set to address. On the board, write two potential opening sentences — one that simply describes ('Hedda Gabler is a play about a woman who feels trapped') and one that takes a stance ('Ibsen portrays Hedda's entrapment not as a personal tragedy but as a direct result of a society that offers women beauty and intelligence while denying them the means to utilize either'). Demonstrate to students how the second sentence paves the way for the rest of the essay by taking a clear position, and show how to introduce Act I's depiction of General Gabler as the first piece of evidence.

    Independent task

    Students are tasked with writing a detailed analytical essay of 500–600 words that addresses the question: 'How does Ibsen use the character of Hedda Gabler to explore the relationship between gender, freedom, and power?' The essay should include: an introduction that presents a clear argument (avoiding a plot summary); a paragraph on Act I that analyzes at least one quotation from either the opening stage directions or the exchange between Hedda and Aunt Julie; a paragraph on Act II that examines either the scene where Hedda loads the pistol or Brack's 'triangle' speech; a paragraph on Act III that discusses the manuscript-burning and the phrase 'I am burning your child'; a paragraph on Act IV that looks at Brack's blackmail and Hedda's final exit; and a conclusion that revisits the argument made in the introduction. Students are allowed to refer to their annotated texts and the four paragraphs crafted in earlier lessons for source material. The essay is due at the end of the lesson and will serve as the summative assessment.

    Exit ticket

    Write one sentence that states the single most important thing Ibsen wants his audience to understand about Hedda Gabler by the time the curtain falls on Act IV — and then write a second sentence explaining why you chose that idea rather than any other.

Activities

Portrait and Pistol: Symbol Tracking Across All Four Acts 30 min · pairs

Each pair gets a table with four rows (one for each act) and two columns labeled 'General Gabler's portrait' and 'The pistols'. Students review their annotated texts to find every instance where either symbol appears or is mentioned, recording the page number, the speaker, and a brief comment on what the symbol signifies at that moment. Afterward, pairs compose a three-sentence conclusion discussing how the meaning of one symbol evolves throughout the play before returning the completed table along with their conclusion.

Hedda's Exits: Mapping the Closing Doors 25 min · groups

Groups of three receive a list of six moments from Acts I–IV where Hedda could theoretically escape her situation (for example, refusing to marry Tesman; teaming up with Lövborg; accepting Brack's 'triangle'; fleeing with Thea; or using the pistol on Brack). For each moment, the group writes one sentence explaining why Ibsen makes that exit impossible, citing a specific line or stage direction. The groups then return the annotated list with their six explanations, which will directly inform their essay planning.

Rival Women: Hedda and Thea Comparison Grid 20 min · pairs

Pairs receive a two-column grid labeled 'Hedda Gabler' and 'Thea Elvsted'. Using Acts II and III, they locate three contrasting quotations for each character — one concerning her relationship with Lövborg, one regarding her relationship with social convention, and one that unveils her inner life. For each pair of quotations, they craft a single comparative sentence that starts with 'Whereas Thea…, Hedda…'. The finished grid and three comparison sentences are returned and utilized as revision material.

Brack in the Dock: Dramatic Monologue Hot-Seat 20 min · whole class

One student takes on the role of Judge Brack in the 'hot seat' after Act IV. The rest of the class, using their annotated texts from Act II and Act IV, prepares three questions each that push Brack to defend his actions — specifically regarding the 'triangle' proposal, the blackmail, and his final line, 'Good God — people don't do such things!' The student in the hot seat must respond in character, using language that matches Brack's style from Act II. After the activity, each student writes a sentence assessing whether Ibsen portrays Brack as a villain or as a reflection of a corrupt society.

Burning Words: Close Reading the Manuscript Scene 25 min · individual

Each student gets a printed excerpt from the manuscript-burning scene in Act III, starting with Hedda opening the stove and ending with 'curly-locks!'. They independently annotate it using three colored pens: one for language choices, another for stage directions, and the last for insights into Hedda's psychology. Afterward, students write a 100-word analysis addressing the question: 'What does this scene reveal about what Hedda truly wants?' Once completed, they return the annotated excerpt along with their 100-word response.

First and Last Lines: Framing the Whole Play 15 min · pairs

Pairs are provided with two excerpts: the opening exchange of Act I featuring Aunt Julie and Bertha discussing the villa, and the closing exchange of Act IV where Tesman and Thea plan to reconstruct the manuscript, culminating in Brack's remark, "Good God — people don't do such things!" They will write three sentences that reflect on what Ibsen accomplishes by starting and concluding with characters who are completely engrossed in domestic or intellectual pursuits, while Hedda remains overlooked or absent. These three sentences will serve as a mini-essay introduction.

Assessment

  • Lesson 1 exit ticket: checks whether students can infer thematic significance from a single stage prop (General Gabler's portrait) rather than simply describing it.
  • Lesson 1 PEEL paragraph: checks whether students can embed two different types of quotation (stage direction and dialogue) and comment on the effect of each.
  • Lesson 2 peer-marking: checks whether students can identify the power dynamic between Hedda and Lövborg in Act II and explain how Thea's presence complicates it.
  • Lesson 3 paragraph handed in at the door: checks whether students can track a symbol (the manuscript) across a single act and explain why the burning is both a climax and a revelation of character.
  • Lesson 4 paragraph returned with written comments: checks whether students can hold two contradictory interpretations (defeat and defiance) simultaneously and support both with specific textual evidence from Act IV.

Summative task

Write a full analytical essay of 500–600 words in response to the question: 'How does Ibsen use the character of Hedda Gabler to explore the relationship between gender, freedom, and power?' Your essay must open with a sentence that states your argument — not a plot summary. You must write a paragraph on Act I (using the opening stage directions or the Hedda–Aunt Julie exchange), a paragraph on Act II (using the pistol-loading scene or Brack's 'triangle' speech), a paragraph on Act III (using the manuscript-burning and the phrase 'I am burning your child'), and a paragraph on Act IV (using Brack's blackmail and Hedda's final exit). Your conclusion must return to the argument you stated at the start. Embed and analyse at least six quotations across the essay.

Marking notes

Top-band responses present a well-developed argument about how Ibsen's dramatic techniques—like stage directions, symbolism, and dialogue—depict Hedda's entrapment, tracing that argument throughout all four acts. Mid-band responses point out relevant moments and include quotations, but they focus more on the content of the dialogue than on how Ibsen's choices convey meaning. Lower-band responses summarize the plot with some quotations and make broad claims about themes. A key factor distinguishing these responses is whether students view Hedda's suicide as an inevitable tragedy or as Ibsen's intentional critique of social structures, along with their ability to back up that interpretation with specific evidence from Acts II and IV.

Standards covered

Common Core 11 12
  • RL.11-12.1 — Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
  • RL.11-12.3 — Analyse the impact of the author's choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama, including where a story is set, how the action is ordered, and how the characters are introduced and developed.
  • RL.11-12.4 — Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyse the impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone.
  • RL.11-12.5 — Analyse how an author's choices concerning how to structure specific parts of a text contribute to its overall structure and meaning as well as its aesthetic impact.
  • W.11-12.1 — Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
AP Literature
  • Literary Argumentation (LAN-1) — Develop a thesis that interprets a literary text and defend it with evidence.
  • Figurative Language (FIG-1) — Analyse how an author uses specific words, images, and symbols to contribute to meaning.
  • Character (CHR-1) — Analyse how complex characters develop over the course of a text and interact with other characters to advance the plot or develop a theme.
  • Structure (STR-1) — Analyse how an author's structural choices contribute to the meaning and effect of a literary work.
  • Narration (NAR-1) — Analyse how the perspective from which a story is told shapes the portrayal of character and theme.
AQA
  • AO1 — Read, understand and respond to texts; maintain a critical style and develop an informed personal response; use textual references, including quotations, to support and illustrate interpretations.
  • AO2 — Analyse the language, form and structure used by a writer to create meanings and effects, using relevant subject terminology where appropriate.
  • AO3 — Show understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written and received.
  • AO5 (Language and Literature) — Demonstrate understanding of the methods that writers use to shape meaning.
Edexcel
  • AO1 — Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology, and coherent, accurate written expression.
  • AO2 — Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts.
  • AO3 — Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which literary texts are written and received.
  • AO4 — Explore connections across literary texts.
IB Lit
  • Criterion A — Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the text, including its context and the author's choices.
  • Criterion B — Analyse the ways in which the author's choices of language, structure, technique and style shape meaning.
  • Criterion C — Organise ideas into a coherent and persuasive argument supported by textual evidence.

Storgy generator

Plan it for your class instead

Choose the curriculum, the year group, how many lessons you have, and what the sequence should be about. Grounded in Storgy's analysis of Hedda Gabler.

Plan Hedda Gabler for your class1 credit
Hedda GablerHenrik Ibsen

Powered by Claude. One credit per plan. First run free — no signup.