Skip to content
Storgy

Year 12–13 / Grades 11–12

Antigone (Sophocles) — a five-lesson scheme of work

This sequence guides students from their first encounter with Sophocles' Theban world to the point where they can write independently with analytical depth. In Lesson 1, we outline the central conflict by exploring the Prologue and Creon's Edict. Lesson 2 dives into Antigone's defiance and challenges Creon's authority during the Second Episode. In Lesson 3, we look at the play's dramatic structure and analyze how Haemon and Tiresias serve as foil and prophet. Lesson 4 follows the tragic Exodus and highlights Creon's hamartia. Finally, Lesson 5 brings the entire play together in a timed essay that debates divine law versus state power. By the end, students will understand how Sophocles crafts tragic inevitability through his use of language, form, and the conflict between two opposing moral orders.

Objectives

  • Analyse how Sophocles uses the Prologue (Ch.1) and Creon's first speech (Ch.3) to establish two opposing moral frameworks — divine law and civic authority.
  • Explain how Antigone's confrontation with Creon in Ch.4 constructs her as a tragic hero through her language of defiance and her appeal to unwritten laws.
  • Evaluate how Sophocles uses Haemon (Ch.5) and Tiresias (Ch.6) as dramatic devices to expose the consequences of Creon's hubris.
  • Write a fully evidenced analytical paragraph that embeds and interrogates quotation from a named episode of the play.
  • Construct a sustained essay argument about the conflict between divine and human law, drawing on evidence from at least three episodes of the play.

The sequence

  1. Lesson 1: Two Laws, One City: Establishing the Conflict in the Prologue and Creon's Edict

    55 min · ch. 1, 3
    Do now

    Read the two statements displayed on the board without looking at your text. Statement A: 'A ruler's law is the city's survival.' Statement B: 'Some laws exist before any ruler.' In two sentences, explain which statement you find more persuasive and why. You will revisit your response at the end of the lesson.

    Teacher input

    Model a close reading of Creon's opening address to the Chorus in Chapter 3, particularly focusing on the lines where he states that loyalty to the state takes precedence over family ties ('No man who is his country's enemy shall call himself my friend'). Use the visualiser for annotations: examine how the imperative mood and the term 'enemy' frame civic duty as a military obligation; discuss how the Chorus's respectful response ('It is in your power, Creon, to make whatever laws you will') highlights the risks of unchecked authority. Help students understand that Sophocles is not merely portraying Creon as a villain, but rather as a man with a coherent — albeit fatal — political philosophy.

    Independent task

    Re-read Antigone's speech to Ismene in Chapter 1, from "He has no right to keep me from my own" to the end of the Prologue. Write one PEEL paragraph (approximately 150 words) that analyzes how Sophocles uses Antigone's language in this speech to portray her as a character who prioritizes divine duty over her own safety. Be sure to include at least two quotations from Chapter 1, comment on a specific word or grammatical choice in each, and conclude your paragraph with a sentence that connects Antigone's stance in this moment to the larger conflict with Creon that unfolds throughout the play.

    Exit ticket

    In one sentence, state the single most important difference between the moral framework Antigone expresses in Ch.1 and the moral framework Creon expresses in Ch.3, using one word from each chapter to support your answer.

  2. Lesson 2: Defiance on Trial: Antigone's Confrontation with Creon in the Second Episode

    55 min · ch. 4
    Do now

    Without opening your text, jot down everything you recall about Antigone's behavior during her encounter with Creon in Chapter 4. After that, open Chapter 4 and read their initial exchange. Highlight any details you forgot or got wrong. Come prepared to share one surprising insight.

    Teacher input

    Model the analysis of Antigone's central declaration in Chapter 4 — "I did not think your edicts strong enough to overrule the unwritten and unfailing laws of heaven" — on the board as a shared text. Annotate the comparative construction ("strong enough to overrule"), which suggests a hierarchy of laws. Discuss the adjective "unwritten" and explain how its invisibility enhances its authority in Antigone's reasoning. Examine the phrase "laws of heaven" and how it contrasts Creon's decree, making it seem temporary next to the eternal. Demonstrate to students how this single sentence encapsulates the entire thematic structure of a tragedy.

    Independent task

    Read the complete dialogue between Creon and Antigone in Chapter 4, starting from the Guard's report of her re-arrest to Creon's announcement of her sentence. Write two connected PEEL paragraphs, totaling about 250 words: the first should analyze how Sophocles uses Antigone's language to portray her defiance as principled rather than reckless; the second should examine how Creon's language in the same scene shows that his authority stems from pride as much as from political conviction. Each paragraph must include a different quotation from Chapter 4 and should conclude with a sentence that compares the rhetorical strategies of both characters.

    Exit ticket

    Write one sentence explaining what the word 'unwritten' in Antigone's speech does that the word 'divine' alone could not do — think about what is implied about Creon's laws by contrast.

  3. Lesson 3: Voices of Warning: Haemon, the Chorus, and Tiresias as Dramatic Foils

    55 min · ch. 2, 5, 6
    Do now

    On the board are three brief quotations — one from Haemon in Chapter 5, one from the Chorus in Chapter 2, and one from Tiresias in Chapter 6. Without referencing your text, identify which quotation belongs to which speaker and write a sentence about what each speaker is urging Creon to do. Afterward, verify your answers by locating the lines in your text.

    Teacher input

    Model a reading of Haemon's argument in Chapter 5, focusing on the moment when he tells Creon: "The man who thinks that he alone is wise, that he can speak and listen to no one else, when known, is found to be empty." On the board, annotate the conditional structure ("the man who thinks"), which subtly distances Haemon from direct blame while still making the target clear. Highlight the tricolon of failure ("thinks… speaks… listens to no one") that builds up to the harsh final adjective "empty." Discuss how Sophocles chooses to use a son's voice instead of a rival's, which makes Creon's isolation seem more tragic than menacing. Introduce the idea of the dramatic foil: Haemon represents the reasoned flexibility that Creon stubbornly rejects.

    Independent task

    Tiresias's warning to Creon in Chapter 6 highlights the playwright Sophocles's use of dramatic devices that foreshadow Creon's impending punishment. Tiresias, though blind, perceives the corruption of Thebes, illustrated by his vivid imagery of “the altar-fires” that are “smoldering” and the “screeching birds” that signify disorder. The image of the corrupted altar-fires symbolizes the breakdown of divine favor, suggesting that the gods have turned away from Creon’s rule due to his hubris. This powerful metaphor signals that consequences for Creon’s actions are already set in motion.

    The Chorus, typically a voice of reason and community in Greek tragedy, reacts with unease following Tiresias's departure, indicating a shift in the atmosphere of the play. Their concern reflects the gravity of Tiresias's revelations and suggests that they, too, fear for Creon’s fate. Creon’s dismissal of Tiresias as corrupt may evoke less sympathy from a Greek audience, as it showcases his stubbornness and refusal to heed prophetic warnings. This arrogance makes him appear tragically flawed, aligning with the classical understanding of hubris leading to downfall.

    Exit ticket

    In two sentences, explain how Haemon in Ch.5 and Tiresias in Ch.6 each use a different kind of authority — one personal, one prophetic — to challenge Creon, and why Creon rejects both.

  4. Lesson 4: Too Late: Catastrophe, Hamartia, and the Exodus

    55 min · ch. 7
    Do now

    Before you open your text, make a prediction: jot down the order you think the three deaths in Ch.7 will be revealed or depicted, and for each one, write a single word that captures how you expect Creon to respond. Next, open Ch.7 and read the Messenger's speech about the deaths. Take notes on any moments where the sequence of events surprised you.

    Teacher input

    Model a close reading of the Messenger's speech in Ch. 7 that describes Haemon's death. Focus on the lines where Haemon spits at his father, lunges with his sword, misses, and then ultimately falls on his own blade next to Antigone's body. Use the visualizer to annotate the following points:

    • The quick succession of short actions (spit, lunge, miss, fall) establishes a rhythm of futility, emphasizing the tragic outcome.
    • The physical closeness of Haemon's body to Antigone's highlights how Creon's decree literally envelops him.
    • Eurydice's wordless exit right after receiving the news carries a weight that speaks volumes, making it more foreboding than any dialogue could convey. Sophocles effectively uses this silence as a structural device, delaying the impact before amplifying it.
    • Relate this to the idea of hamartia: Creon's flaw lies not in ignorance but in his unwillingness to listen.
    Independent task

    Revisit the last section of Chapter 7, starting from Creon's entrance with Haemon's body to the final lines of the Chorus. In about 180 words, analyze how Sophocles portrays Creon's last appearance as a powerful visual and verbal representation of the fallout from hubris. Be sure to reference at least one stage direction or specific physical action from the text, include a quotation from Creon's lament, and wrap up with a sentence discussing what the Chorus's closing lines imply about the connection between wisdom and suffering in Sophocles' moral framework.

    Exit ticket

    Write one full sentence defining hamartia and then a second sentence identifying the precise moment in Ch.6 or Ch.7 where you believe Creon's hamartia becomes irreversible — quote the line or describe the action that marks the point of no return.

  5. Lesson 5: Conscience Against the State: Writing the Sustained Argument

    60 min · ch. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    Do now

    On the board is today’s essay question: 'How does Sophocles illustrate the conflict between divine law and human authority as the main tragic force in Antigone?' Take five minutes to quietly write a one-sentence thesis — your clear, arguable response to this question — and then list three pieces of evidence from three different chapters that you will use to back it up. Remember, this is just planning time, so no full sentences yet.

    Teacher input

    Model a compelling introduction for your essay based on the question above and using Chapter 1 as your foundation. On the board, draft an opening paragraph that effectively identifies Sophocles' dramatic context—specifically the City Dionysia in 441 BCE during Periclean Athens—in a meaningful way. Clearly articulate a thesis that distinguishes Antigone's commitment to eternal divine law from Creon's focus on temporary civic necessity. Additionally, outline the essay's argument by mentioning the three key episodes (Ch.1, Ch.4, Ch.6 or Ch.7) that will be explored. Make sure to annotate the rationale for each sentence's inclusion—every sentence should contribute more than just a summary of the plot.

    Independent task

    Write a detailed analytical essay of 500–700 words addressing the question: 'How does Sophocles portray the tension between divine law and human authority as the main tragic force in Antigone?' Your essay should include: an introduction that presents a clear, debatable thesis and places the play within its dramatic context; a paragraph analyzing Antigone's speech to Creon in Chapter 4 ('I did not think your edicts strong enough…'), focusing closely on at least one specific word or grammatical choice; a paragraph examining either Haemon's argument in Chapter 5 or Tiresias's warning in Chapter 6, illustrating how Sophocles employs secondary characters to reinforce Antigone's moral stance; a paragraph discussing Creon's final lament in Chapter 7, arguing what his downfall reveals about Sophocles' perspective on this conflict; and a conclusion that revisits your thesis while making a final evaluative statement regarding which law — divine or human — Sophocles ultimately depicts as more powerful, and how the play's structure (tragedy, the Chorus, the messenger speech) embodies that judgment. Be sure to incorporate and analyze at least four quotations from at least three different chapters. Avoid summarizing the plot; every sentence should support your argument.

    Exit ticket

    Read back your thesis sentence from your introduction. Write one new sentence explaining whether your essay proved that thesis or whether the evidence pushed you towards a more complicated position — and if so, what that position is.

Activities

Two Laws Debate: Divine vs. Civic Authority 20 min · whole class

Divide the room into two sections: one side will argue for Creon's stance that civic law is supreme, while the other side will support Antigone’s belief that divine law takes precedence. Each group will receive a card with three quotations from Chapters 1 and 3. Students will have three minutes to prepare their arguments, then they will take turns presenting their claims, using only the textual evidence provided. The teacher will facilitate the discussion. At the end, students will return a single written sentence stating which side they found more persuasive and why, including one quotation to support their choice.

Annotated Monologue: Antigone's Defence in Ch.4 25 min · individual

Students get a printed excerpt of Antigone's speech to Creon in Ch. 4, from 'I did not think your edicts strong enough…' to '…it is no grief to me.' They annotate it using three colours: red for language that refers to divine authority, blue for language that questions Creon's legitimacy, and green for language that shows Antigone's acceptance of death. Afterward, students return the annotated extract along with a two-sentence summary explaining what the colour distribution indicates about Antigone's priorities.

Foil Comparison Chart: Haemon and Ismene 20 min · pairs

Each pair works with a two-column chart titled 'Haemon (Ch.5)' and 'Ismene (Ch.1)'. They complete rows detailing what each character wants Antigone to do, the arguments they use, what each character reveals about Creon, and insights into gender and power dynamics in Thebes. After finishing the chart, pairs return it with a collaboratively written sentence arguing which character Sophocles portrays more sympathetically and why.

Tiresias Omen Close Reading 15 min · groups

Groups of three receive the passage in Ch. 6 where Tiresias describes the screeching birds and the failing altar-fires. Each student in the group selects one image (birds, fire, silence) and composes three sentences explaining its symbolic meaning and what it foreshadows about Creon's fate. The group then writes a single shared sentence tying all three images to the play's theme of divine retribution. Each group submits their four sentences on a single sheet.

Messenger Speech Sequencing and Effect 20 min · pairs

Pairs receive the Messenger's speech from Ch. 7, divided into six strips (Antigone's death, Haemon's discovery, Haemon's attack on Creon, Haemon's suicide, Eurydice's silent exit, Creon's lament). They arrange the strips in order and then respond in writing: why does Sophocles postpone Eurydice's death until after Creon has started to grieve? Their written response (three to four sentences) is returned alongside the correctly sequenced strips.

Thesis Workshop: Turning a Topic into an Argument 15 min · whole class

The teacher writes four weak thesis statements about Antigone on the board (for example, 'This essay will discuss divine law and human law in Antigone'). The whole class works together to transform each statement into a strong, arguable claim that highlights Sophocles' approach rather than merely addressing his topic. Afterward, students quietly create their own thesis statements for the essay question. They submit a single index card with their thesis on one side and a piece of evidence to support it on the other.

Assessment

  • Lesson 1 exit ticket checks whether students can articulate the distinction between divine and civic law using textual vocabulary from Ch.1 and Ch.3 rather than paraphrase.
  • Lesson 2 PEEL paragraphs are checked for: an embedded quotation from Ch.4; a comment on a specific word or grammatical feature; and a comparative sentence linking Antigone's and Creon's rhetorical strategies.
  • Lesson 3 structured response is checked for: identification of a specific image from Tiresias's speech in Ch.6; comment on the Chorus's reaction; and an evaluative sentence about Creon's sympathy.
  • Lesson 4 exit ticket checks whether students can define hamartia accurately and locate the precise moment of Creon's irreversible error in Ch.6 or Ch.7 with textual support.
  • Lesson 5 thesis index cards (from the Thesis Workshop activity) are read before the timed essay to check whether students have a genuinely arguable claim rather than a topic statement.

Summative task

Write a sustained analytical essay of 500–700 words in response to the following question: 'How does Sophocles present the conflict between divine law and human authority as the central tragic force in Antigone?' Your essay must open with a clear thesis, analyse Antigone's confrontation with Creon in Ch.4 in close detail, use either Haemon (Ch.5) or Tiresias (Ch.6) as supporting evidence, and conclude with Creon's collapse in Ch.7. Embed and interrogate at least four quotations from at least three chapters. Every sentence must serve your argument — do not retell the plot.

Marking notes

Top-band responses present a clear, debatable thesis about Sophocles' dramatic technique—beyond just his topics—and maintain this focus throughout all three body paragraphs. They analyze quotations from Chapter 4 at the level of specific words or phrases, rather than just quoting them. Mid-band responses clearly identify the conflict but use quotations more as illustrations than as supporting evidence. Lower-band responses tend to recount events from Chapter 7 without linking them to the argument of divine law versus human law, or they make broad statements about 'themes' without referencing specific moments in the text.

Standards covered

Common Core 11 12
  • RL.11-12.1 — Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
  • RL.11-12.3 — Analyse the impact of the author's choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama (e.g. where a story is set, how the action is ordered, how the characters are introduced and developed).
  • RL.11-12.4 — Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyse the impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone.
  • RL.11-12.6 — Analyse a case in which grasping a point of view or cultural experience requires distinguishing what is directly stated from what is really meant.
AP Literature
  • Literary Argumentation (LAN-1) — Develop a thesis that makes a defensible claim about an interpretation of literature.
  • Explain the function of character (CHR-1) — Explain how Sophocles uses Haemon, Tiresias, and Ismene as dramatic foils to develop Creon's hamartia.
  • Explain the function of structure (STR-1) — Analyse how the sequencing of episodes (Parodos through Exodus) builds toward the catastrophe of Ch.7.
  • Explain the function of figurative language (FIG-1) — Analyse how Tiresias's imagery of corrupted birds and altar-fires in Ch.6 functions as dramatic foreshadowing.
AQA
  • AO1 — Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology, and coherent, accurate written expression.
  • AO2 — Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts, with attention to Sophocles' use of language, form, and dramatic structure across the seven episodes.
  • AO3 — Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which literary texts are written and received, including the City Dionysia, Periclean democracy, and the play's reception through Hegel, Brecht, and Anouilh.
  • AO5 — Explore literary texts informed by different interpretations, including Hegel's reading of Antigone as a collision of two equally valid ethical claims.
Edexcel
  • AO1 — Articulate informed responses to literary texts using relevant concepts and terminology; write with coherence and accuracy.
  • AO2 — Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in Antigone, focusing on Sophocles' dramatic language, the function of the Chorus, and the structural role of the messenger speech in Ch.7.
  • AO3 — Demonstrate understanding of contexts of production and reception, including the religious, political, and theatrical conventions of fifth-century Athens.

Storgy generator

Plan it for your class instead

Choose the curriculum, the year group, how many lessons you have, and what the sequence should be about. Grounded in Storgy's analysis of Antigone.

Plan Antigone for your class1 credit
AntigoneSophocles

Powered by Claude. One credit per plan. First run free — no signup.