Put "The Destruction of Sennacherib" by George Gordon Byron next to "The Charge of the Light Brigade" by Alfred, Lord Tennyson and the first thing you notice is the sound. Both poems gallop forward.
Poets
George Gordon Byron / Alfred, Lord Tennyson
Years
1815
§01 The thesis
The Destruction of Sennacherib & The Charge of the Light Brigade
A reader's case for putting these two side by side — what each carries, and what they argue when they sit on the same page.
However, the gallop is where the similarities stop. Byron's poem, published in 1815, recounts the destruction of an Assyrian army outside Jerusalem—an event from the Hebrew Bible where God does the killing, silently, in the dark of night. There’s no charge. No one makes a choice. The soldiers simply lie down alive and wake up dead. In contrast, Tennyson's poem, written in 1854 in response to a real cavalry disaster at Balaclava, portrays men who understand the order is flawed yet ride into the cannon fire regardless. The death in Byron's work is divine and swift; the death in Tennyson's is human and tragic.
These two poems embody the long-standing debate within war poetry: is mass death the will of God, or the result of military mistakes? Both poets convey their messages through a galloping line, but they arrive at entirely different conclusions.
⁂
§02 The dialectic axes
The two poems on four axes
Each axis isolates one specific vector — speaker, form, image, closing move — and reads the two poems against each other on that single dimension.
Axis
Poem A
The Destruction of Sennacherib
George Gordon Byron
Poem B
The Charge of the Light Brigade
Alfred, Lord Tennyson
01Speaker
Poem A · The Destruction of Sennacherib
Byron's speaker in "Sennacherib" takes on the role of a detached witness — resembling a narrator from scripture. The tone is steady, assertive, and somewhat distant, like someone reciting from a holy text. Notably, the poem does not include the word 'I' at all.
Poem B · The Charge of the Light Brigade
Tennyson's speaker in "The Charge of the Light Brigade" acts as a public poet reacting to a news event. The voice is urgent and changes tone—from a journalist's perspective ('Some one had blunder'd') to an elegist's ('When can their glory fade?') to that of an advocate ('Honour the charge they made!'). The poem feels as though it's directed at a living audience.
02Form
Poem A · The Destruction of Sennacherib
"Sennacherib" consists of six quatrains written in strict anapaestic tetrameter, following an AABB rhyme scheme. The structure feels almost mechanical, as each stanza concludes with a rhyming couplet, creating a sense of inevitability that reflects its theological themes.
Poem B · The Charge of the Light Brigade
"The Charge of the Light Brigade" employs dactylic dimeter but features variable line lengths and a more urgent, flexible rhyme scheme. The stanzas vary in length, and Tennyson frequently repeats entire lines and phrases ('Rode the six hundred,' 'All the world wonder'd'), creating a style that resembles a ballad or chant rather than a traditional ode.
03Central image
Poem A · The Destruction of Sennacherib
Byron's main focus is the lifeless body after the killing: 'the steed with his nostril all wide' breathing nothing, the rider 'distorted and pale,' and the unblown trumpet. These images convey a sudden, complete halt — life abruptly interrupted in the midst of action.
Poem B · The Charge of the Light Brigade
Tennyson's main image focuses on movement while facing danger: 'Cannon to right of them, / Cannon to left of them, / Cannon in front of them.' The poem fixates on the layout of the trap and the bravery of the men as they charge through it despite the odds. While Byron depicts the aftermath, Tennyson captures the moment of action.
04Closing move
Poem A · The Destruction of Sennacherib
Byron concludes "Sennacherib" by zooming out to a vast perspective — shattered idols, grieving widows, and the dissolution of a whole civilization 'in the glance of the Lord.' The last image is both theological and distant. It leaves the reader feeling insignificant in the face of divine might.
Poem B · The Charge of the Light Brigade
Tennyson wraps up "The Charge of the Light Brigade" with a direct call to action: 'Honour the Light Brigade, / Noble six hundred!' This closing invites the reader to join in a shared act of remembrance. The last image evokes a sense of humanity and community rather than something divine and isolated.
§03 Synthesis & departure
The shared ground and the divergence
Shared
The most obvious similarity between these poems is their meter. Byron constructs "Sennacherib" using anapaests—two unstressed syllables followed by a stressed one—while Tennyson's "The Charge of the Light Brigade" relies on dactyls, which are the opposite: one stressed syllable followed by two unstressed ones. This choice creates a rolling, forward-driving rhythm that embodies movement and urgency, making you feel the army advancing even before you grasp the words.
Both poems also emphasize sheer numbers. Byron's "host" is never quantified but feels infinite; Tennyson's "six hundred" echoes like a tolling bell. This focus on mass enhances the tragedy—the larger the force, the greater the loss.
Thematically, both poems explore the themes of war, death, and human vulnerability. In each, the soldiers are powerless to save themselves. Nature imagery is woven throughout as well: Byron's fading army is likened to autumn leaves, while Tennyson's riders charge into a "valley of Death" that feels as elemental as the weather. Neither poem delves into the politics of war; instead, both focus on the intimate reality of death.
Where they diverge
The sharpest difference lies in who wields the power. In Byron's "Sennacherib," God acts while the Assyrian army is simply an object. The soldiers are silent, with no decisions or resistance. The Angel of Death "breathed in the face of the foe as he passed," and that's the end of it. The human military force — with spears shining like stars and banners waving — becomes mere rust on armor and foam on grass. The tone conveys awe rather than grief.
In Tennyson's poem, the soldiers are active participants who make choices. "Theirs not to reason why, / Theirs but to do and die" is the most frequently quoted line because it highlights the soldiers' awareness and their choice to ignore it. Someone has "blunder'd" — a term Tennyson drops into the poem with weight — and the six hundred recognize it but ride on nonetheless. This makes Tennyson's death tragic in the classical sense, while Byron's death is purely divine.
The closing lines further emphasize this distinction. Byron concludes with God's supremacy: the Gentile army "hath melted like snow in the glance of the Lord." In contrast, Tennyson finishes with a call to human memory: "Honour the Light Brigade." One poem compels you to fear God; the other urges you to remember men.
§04 A reader's order of operations
Which to read first
If you found your way to this page via Tennyson's "The Charge of the Light Brigade," you should check out Byron's "The Destruction of Sennacherib" next. It highlights what Tennyson's galloping rhythm sounds like without human involvement—no clumsy officers and no soldiers making the choice to die, just God and silence. This contrast makes Tennyson's focus on human bravery seem like a direct challenge to the kind of poem Byron wrote.
If you began with Byron, you'll notice Tennyson feels louder and more conflicted, and that's intentional. Byron's poem is a self-contained piece; Tennyson's poem refuses to be neatly wrapped up.
§05 Reader's questions
On The Destruction of Sennacherib vs The Charge of the Light Brigade, frequently asked
Answer
Yes, quite often — particularly in units focusing on meter and prosody. These are the two most frequently mentioned examples of anapaestic and dactylic gallop rhythms in English poetry. By pairing them, teachers can illustrate how the same basic beat can evoke entirely different emotional effects.
Answer
Byron's "The Destruction of Sennacherib" came out in 1815 as part of his *Hebrew Melodies*. Tennyson's "The Charge of the Light Brigade," written in 1854—almost forty years later—was inspired by a newspaper article on the Battle of Balaclava.
Answer
From Byron, it often starts with: 'The Assyrian came down like the wolf on the fold.' With Tennyson, the most frequently quoted lines are the trio 'Theirs not to make reply, / Theirs not to reason why, / Theirs but to do and die' — which has become a shorthand for blind obedience in everyday language.
Answer
It draws from a biblical story found in 2 Kings 19 and Isaiah 37, where the Assyrian king Sennacherib lays siege to Jerusalem, only to have his army wiped out overnight by an angel. Scholars debate whether there's a historical basis for this biblical account, but Byron regards it as sacred history rather than a mere invention.
Answer
Not quite. The term 'blunder'd' in the poem shows that Tennyson recognized the order was a disastrous mistake. His poem captures both ideas simultaneously — the men were heroic, but the command was reckless — adding layers to its complexity that go beyond initial impressions.
Answer
An anapaest is a metrical foot made up of two unstressed syllables followed by a stressed one (da-da-DUM). In contrast, a dactyl consists of a stressed syllable followed by two unstressed ones (DUM-da-da). Byron prefers anapaests, while Tennyson tends toward dactyls. Both forms produce a lively, three-beat rhythm, but the anapaest gives a sense of speeding up into a beat, whereas the dactyl feels like a beat rushing ahead.
Answer
Tennyson's poem gains depth from this argument, as it presents an internal tension: it simultaneously praises the soldiers while criticizing the order that led to their deaths. In contrast, Byron's poem celebrates divine power instead of military heroism, creating a different perspective. By examining both poems together, a student can illustrate the various complexities found in war poetry.