Skip to content
Storgy

Character analysis

Rainie Pritchard

in Where the Red Fern Grows by Wilson Rawls

Rainie Pritchard is a supporting antagonist in Wilson Rawls' Where the Red Fern Grows, primarily acting as a foil and instigator whose actions lead to tragic outcomes. As the younger of the two Pritchard brothers, he is a rough and confrontational boy from the Ozark hills who takes pleasure in taunting Billy Colman about his hounds. Rainie's most significant moment comes when he and his brother Rubin challenge Billy to a bet, wagering two dollars that Old Dan and Little Ann cannot catch the legendary "ghost coon," a raccoon so clever that no dog has ever managed to catch it. Throughout the hunt, Rainie is openly contemptuous and provocative, goading Billy and expressing doubt about his dogs at every opportunity, which paints him as mean-spirited and insecure.

When Old Dan and Little Ann successfully tree the ghost coon and Billy chooses not to kill it, chaos ensues. Rubin grabs Billy's axe with the intention of harming the dogs, trips, and falls on the blade — a tragedy that unfolds in part due to the tense atmosphere Rainie helped create. In the aftermath, Rainie is left as a traumatized witness to his brother's death, and his hostility shifts into grief and shock.

Rainie's character arc transitions from a bully to a broken bystander. While he never becomes sympathetic in a conventional sense, his presence highlights themes of pride, cruelty, and the unpredictable consequences of rivalry. He embodies the darker, rougher aspects of Ozark boyhood, contrasting sharply with Billy's sincere determination and affection for his dogs.

About this character

Form
Novel
Author
Wilson Rawls
First published
1961

The person01–03

01·Who they are

Who is Rainie Pritchard?

Rainie Pritchard is the younger of the two Pritchard brothers, a rough Ozark boy who appears in a concentrated but consequential section of Wilson Rawls' novel. He is introduced alongside Rubin, and the two brothers function almost as a single threatening force when they approach Billy Colman. Rawls sketches Rainie with economical but effective strokes: he is loud where Rubin is dangerous, contemptuous where Billy is earnest. He takes visible pleasure in mockery, targeting Billy's pride in his hounds as the surest way to wound him. Though his page-time is limited, Rainie carries substantial narrative weight because his taunting ignites the chain of events that ends in irreversible tragedy.

02·Arc & motivation

What is Rainie Pritchard's arc and motivation?

Rainie's arc is a compressed one that moves through three recognisable phases: instigator, witness, and shattered bystander. His motivation in the first phase combines insecurity with the performative cruelty that the novel associates with a less nurturing upbringing than Billy's. When Rainie and Rubin propose the ghost coon bet — wagering two dollars that Old Dan and Little Ann cannot tree a raccoon that has outwitted every dog in the hills — the wager is ostensibly about money but is really about humiliation. Rainie wants to expose Billy's faith in his hounds as naïve, thereby asserting a local hierarchy in which the Pritchards sit above a poor trapper's boy who talks about his dogs like they're extraordinary.

That motivation collapses when the dogs succeed. The second and third phases of Rainie's arc require no dialogue to register: he witnesses Rubin grab Billy's axe, trip, and fall on the blade. The boy who came to the woods to sneer leaves it in shock, his cruelty dissolved by grief. Rawls does not offer Rainie redemption in any tidy sense, but the transformation from tormentor to traumatised child serves as a moral argument about where pride and provocation lead.

03·Key moments

What are Rainie Pritchard's key moments?

The ghost coon hunt (Chapters 12–13) is the single sustained scene in which Rainie is active, containing several notable beats. His running commentary during the hunt — dismissing Old Dan and Little Ann, questioning whether the dogs have truly cornered the ghost coon — establishes his role as the voice of contempt against which Billy's quiet confidence is measured. When the hounds do tree the ghost coon and Billy declines to kill it, Rainie's reaction sharpens the tension: Billy's mercy is interpreted by both brothers as weakness, and it is in this charged moment that Rubin seizes the axe. Rainie's presence as a witness to everything that follows — his brother falling, the wound, the death — makes him the character who must carry the scene's full horror without being its agent. His silence in the aftermath becomes more expressive than any taunting line Rawls could have given him.

The cast04–05

04·Relationships

What are Rainie Pritchard's most important relationships?

With Rubin: The brothers operate as a unit, but Rawls implies a distinction between them. Rubin physically escalates the confrontation; Rainie verbalises it. Their relationship is the kind of sibling pairing where the younger mirrors and amplifies the older without fully controlling the direction. Rainie's grief at Rubin's death is the only moment in which his interior life is legible, reframing everything that preceded it: the cruelty was partly performance, maintained in the shadow of an older brother.

With Billy: Rainie's relationship with Billy is defined by the gap between what Rainie expects and what Billy delivers. Every taunt Rainie levels is answered not by retaliation but by result — the dogs tree the coon, the bet is won, and Billy's dignity is vindicated without Billy ever lowering himself to Rainie's register. This asymmetry makes Rainie a foil in the precise literary sense: his mean-spiritedness illuminates Billy's generosity of spirit by contrast.

With Old Dan and Little Ann: Rainie's scorn for the hounds is specific and personal, making their success pointed. The dogs do not merely win a bet; they entirely refute his judgment.

05·Connected characters

How is Rainie Pritchard connected to the other characters?

Rubin Pritchard

Rainie's older brother and co-instigator of the ghost coon bet. The two act as a unit in bullying Billy, but it is Rubin who escalates the confrontation fatally by grabbing the axe. Rainie witnesses Rubin's death firsthand, an event that shatters the brothers' shared cruelty and leaves Rainie alone and traumatized.

Billy Colman

Rainie's primary target and rival. He mocks Billy's dogs, engineers the ghost coon bet to humiliate him, and maintains a contemptuous attitude throughout the hunt. Billy's refusal to back down — and his dogs' ultimate success — directly exposes the hollowness of Rainie's taunting and sets the tragic chain of events in motion.

Old Dan

Rainie bets against Old Dan's ability to tree the ghost coon, dismissing him as an ordinary hound. Old Dan's success in the bet is a direct rebuke to Rainie's mockery and triggers the fatal confrontation when Rubin moves to kill the dogs.

Little Ann

Like Old Dan, Little Ann is the object of Rainie's scorn during the bet. Her partnership with Old Dan in treeing the ghost coon proves Rainie's contempt unfounded and contributes to the escalation that ends in Rubin's death.

Billy's Grandfather

Billy's grandfather is aware of the Pritchard boys' rough reputation. Though he does not interact directly with Rainie in the text, his general wariness about the Pritchards contextualizes the danger Rainie and Rubin represent to Billy.

Study06–07

06·Questions

Questions readers ask about Rainie Pritchard

Who is Rainie Pritchard in Where the Red Fern Grows?

Rainie Pritchard is the younger of the two Pritchard brothers and a supporting antagonist in Wilson Rawls' novel. He is a rough, confrontational Ozark boy who taunts Billy Colman about his hounds and co-instigates the ghost coon bet. Though he appears in only a handful of chapters, his provocations help set off the chain of events that leads to his brother Rubin's death.

What is the ghost coon bet and how is Rainie Pritchard involved?

The ghost coon bet is a two-dollar wager Rainie and Rubin propose to Billy in Chapters 12–13, wagering that Old Dan and Little Ann cannot tree a legendary raccoon so clever that no dog has ever caught it. Rainie's true goal is not the money but humiliation — he aims to expose Billy's faith in his dogs as naïve and assert the Pritchards' local dominance. When the hounds succeed, Rainie's contempt is completely refuted.

How does Rainie Pritchard relate to his older brother Rubin?

Rainie and Rubin function almost as a single threatening force, but Rawls distinguishes between them: Rubin physically escalates confrontations while Rainie verbalises the cruelty. Rainie mirrors and amplifies his older brother without controlling the direction of their rivalry. Witnessing Rubin grab Billy's axe, trip, and fall on the blade leaves Rainie alone and traumatised, making his grief the only moment his interior life becomes fully visible.

How does Rainie Pritchard treat Billy Colman and his dogs?

Rainie is openly contemptuous toward Billy during the ghost coon hunt, dismissing Old Dan and Little Ann as ordinary hounds and questioning whether they have genuinely cornered the ghost coon. He targets Billy's pride in his dogs as a surefire way to wound him, maintaining a running commentary of mockery designed to humiliate. Billy's quiet confidence — and his dogs' ultimate success — answers every taunt without Billy ever stooping to Rainie's level.

Does Rainie Pritchard have any famous quotes in the novel?

No direct quotes from Rainie Pritchard are recorded in the novel's key passages. Rawls characterises him primarily through implication, gesture, and context rather than memorable spoken lines. Rainie's contemptuous running commentary during the hunt is conveyed through its effect on Billy and the charged atmosphere it creates, making his silence after Rubin's death more expressive than any line Rawls could have given him.

What happens to Rainie Pritchard after Rubin dies?

Rainie is left as a traumatised witness after Rubin grabs Billy's axe, trips, and falls on the blade. His hostility dissolves into grief and shock, transforming him from tormenter to broken bystander. Rawls does not offer him a tidy redemption, but this shift from bully to shattered child serves as a moral argument that cruelty exacts a cost on the person who practises it — not only on its targets.

Why does Rainie Pritchard bully Billy — what motivates him?

Rainie's bullying reflects insecurity combined with the performative cruelty Rawls associates with a harsher upbringing than Billy's. He seeks to expose Billy's belief in his hounds as naïve and assert a local hierarchy placing the Pritchards above a poor trapper's boy. Maintaining that posture also involves performing toughness in the shadow of his older brother Rubin, suggesting much of his cruelty is social theatre rather than genuine malice.

Is Rainie Pritchard directly responsible for Rubin's death?

Rainie is not the direct agent of Rubin's death — it is Rubin himself who grabs Billy's axe and fatally falls on it. However, the tense, contemptuous atmosphere Rainie helped create during the hunt is a necessary condition for the tragedy: the brothers' shared provocation escalates the situation to its breaking point. Rawls constructs the sequence so that Rainie's taunting, while not physically violent, makes the fatal escalation possible.

07·Essay angles

Use this in your essay

Tool · Essay angles

  • Rainie as cautionary foil: How does Rawls use Rainie's trajectory

    from bully to traumatised witness — to argue that cruelty exacts a cost on the person who practises it, not only on its targets?

  • Pride and humiliation in Ozark boyhood: To what extent does Rainie's behaviour reflect a social environment in which masculine status is fragile and must be defended aggressively? How does Billy represent an alternative model?

  • The mechanics of tragedy: Analyse how Rawls constructs the ghost coon sequence so that Rainie's taunting, though not directly violent, becomes a necessary condition of Rubin's death. What does this suggest about collective moral responsibility?

  • Silence as characterisation: Rainie has no recorded direct speech that survives as a key quote, yet his presence is felt throughout the hunt. How does Rawls use implication, gesture, and context to characterise him without extended dialogue?

  • Minor characters and thematic freight: Evaluate how effectively Rawls uses a character who appears in only a handful of chapters to advance the novel's central themes of pride, loss, and consequence.

Where the Red Fern Grows

Continue

Full study guide →