Skip to content
Storgy

Character analysis

The Sharks

in The Old Man and the Sea by Ernest Hemingway

The Sharks act as the novel's main agents of destruction and symbolize the indifferent, chaotic forces that stand against human ambition. They enter the story's climactic third movement, after Santiago has endured days of fatigue to catch the great marlin. The first attacker—a massive Mako—follows the blood trail of the lashed marlin, and Santiago kills it with his harpoon, losing the weapon in the process. This moment sets a pattern: each victory costs Santiago an essential tool, and each new wave of sharks (first galanos, then nameless scavengers arriving in packs at night) strips away more flesh from the marlin until only the skeleton remains. The sharks act not out of malice or intelligence; they are driven by sheer hunger, making them more frightening than any aware foe. Hemingway uses them to illustrate the theme that greatness can be achieved but not held onto—Santiago's perfect catch is real, yet the world prevents him from keeping it. The sharks also challenge Santiago's moral code: he fights back with the harpoon, a knife tied to an oar, a club, and finally with his bare hands on the tiller, refusing to give up even when defeat is inevitable. Their victory is physical; his is ethical. By reducing the marlin to bones, they paradoxically create the evidence of Santiago's achievement that astonishes the tourists on shore, leaving his struggle with a strange, ironic legacy.

About this character

Form
Novella
Author
Ernest Hemingway
First published
1952

The person01–03

01·Who they are

Who is The Sharks?

The sharks of The Old Man and the Sea are not characters in a psychological sense—they lack voice, consciousness, and grudge. This absence makes them formidable. Hemingway introduces them in the novella's third movement as agents of pure appetite, drawn by the blood seeping from the lashed marlin as Santiago begins his long journey home. The first attacker is identified specifically as a Mako—a great, fast, "beautiful" shark that Hemingway describes with the same spare admiration he grants the marlin itself. Following that, the sharks blur into waves: the rough-skinned galanos arriving in pairs, then nameless scavengers emerging from the darkness in packs. They are not evil. They are hungry. That biological simplicity serves as Hemingway's sharpest instrument.

02·Arc & motivation

What is The Sharks's arc and motivation?

The sharks have no arc in the narrative sense, but their collective action maintains an unmistakable structural logic: accumulation and attrition. Each attack strips away another layer of Santiago's ability to resist. The Mako dies on the harpoon, but the harpoon goes with it. The knife, lashed to an oar handle after the harpoon is lost, breaks or is taken. The club splinters. By the time the night scavengers arrive in the final assault, Santiago is fighting them with the tiller itself, an act so desperate it approaches the absurd. Their "motivation" is hunger following a blood trail, making them indifferent in the absolute sense—they are not trying to defeat Santiago; they simply cannot stop eating. This indifference is more philosophically crushing than malice would be, as it offers Santiago nothing to argue with, negotiate with, or outwit.

03·Key moments

What are The Sharks's key moments?

The arrival of the first Mako acts as the novella's pivot. Santiago sees it coming long before it reaches the marlin, tracks its dorsal fin, and kills it cleanly with the harpoon—providing a moment of genuine triumph that nonetheless plants the seed of final defeat, as the harpoon is gone. The subsequent galano attack, where the sharks work in coordinated pairs, indicates the shift from single combat to siege. Santiago kills one with the knife, but the blade is lost or ruined in the process. The nocturnal assault near the novella's end is the most harrowing passage: Santiago can barely see the sharks, can only hear the sounds of tearing and feel the jolts through the hull. He swings the club until he has nothing left to swing at. By the time he reaches the harbor, the marlin is a skeleton—vertebrae, tail, and a long white spine. This image closes the active plot.

The cast04–05

04·Relationships

What are The Sharks's most important relationships?

Santiago is the sole human opponent of the sharks, and the relationship between them illustrates his entire ethical code. He recognizes the fight is unwinnable but fights regardless, measuring each blow against his ideal of DiMaggio enduring bone-spur pain with grace. The sharks test whether that ideal holds under conditions of exhaustion and hopelessness; his refusal to stop serves as Hemingway's answer.

The marlin serves as both the cause of the sharks' arrival and the unit of measure for the destruction they inflict. The marlin's blood draws them; its diminishing body tracks their progress. By reducing it to a skeleton, the sharks transform Santiago's greatest achievement into an emblem of loss—yet paradoxically preserve the evidence of that achievement in the bones.

The tourists, glimpsed at the novella's close, encounter only the skeleton the sharks have left. They mistake it for a shark themselves, which deepens the irony: the sharks' destruction is so total that it erases the nature of the thing destroyed, yet the skeleton's sheer size communicates to Manolin—and through him to the reader—the scale of what Santiago accomplished.

Manolin sees in Santiago's wrecked hands and ruined catch the full cost of the shark attacks. The devastation inflicted by the sharks is the proximate cause of the boy's renewed vow to return to fishing with the old man, making their destruction the unlikely catalyst for human recommitment and continuity.

05·Connected characters

How is The Sharks connected to the other characters?

Santiago

The sharks are Santiago's final and most relentless antagonists. He kills the first Mako with his harpoon, then fights successive waves with a knife, club, and tiller, losing each weapon in turn. They strip the marlin to a skeleton, defeating him materially while his refusal to stop fighting defines his heroic code.

The Marlin

The marlin is the sharks' prey and prize. Drawn by its blood trail, they devour it piece by piece on the long journey home, transforming Santiago's hard-won trophy into bare bones—making the marlin simultaneously the cause of the sharks' arrival and the measure of the destruction they inflict.

The Tourists

The sharks' consumption of the marlin leaves only its massive skeleton, which the tourists observe with bewildered awe at the story's close. Ironically, the sharks' destruction becomes the indirect evidence that communicates the scale of Santiago's achievement to the outside world.

Manolin

Manolin learns of the shark attacks through Santiago's battered state and the ruined marlin. The devastation the sharks have wrought deepens Manolin's grief and his renewed vow to fish alongside Santiago, framing the sharks' victory as the catalyst for the boy's recommitment.

Martin (the café owner)

Martin's role is tangential but contextual: the café world he represents—community, sustenance, ordinary life—stands in contrast to the brutal, lawless ocean realm the sharks inhabit, underscoring how utterly alone Santiago is when the attacks begin.

Joe DiMaggio (referenced)

DiMaggio, whom Santiago invokes as a model of enduring pain with grace, provides the psychological standard against which Santiago measures his fight with the sharks. The sharks thus indirectly test whether Santiago can live up to the DiMaggio ideal he has set for himself.

Study06–07

06·Questions

Questions readers ask about The Sharks

What do the sharks symbolize in The Old Man and the Sea?

The sharks signify the indifferent, chaotic forces of nature that oppose human ambition—not out of malice, but from pure, unstoppable appetite. Hemingway deliberately removes any sense of consciousness or vendetta from them, portraying them as driven solely by hunger. This biological simplicity presents a more crushing philosophical challenge than evil would, as it leaves Santiago with nothing to confront, negotiate, or outsmart—only an absolute indifference.

How does the first shark attack unfold, and what does Santiago lose?

The first attacker—a massive Mako—follows the blood trail of the lashed marlin, and Santiago kills it cleanly with his harpoon, but loses the harpoon in the process. This moment establishes the novella's central pattern of attrition: each victory costs Santiago an essential tool. The lost harpoon triggers a series of subsequent losses—the knife, the club, and finally the tiller—each sacrificed in later attacks.

What is the relationship between the sharks and the marlin?

The marlin serves as both the reason for the sharks' arrival and the measure of the destruction they bring. Its blood attracts them across miles of ocean, and its fading body marks their relentless advance. By turning it into a skeleton—vertebrae, tail, and a long white spine—the sharks convert Santiago's greatest accomplishment into a symbol of loss, while paradoxically keeping the bones as evidence of his catch.

How do the sharks affect Santiago's relationship with Manolin?

The devastation wrought by the sharks—Santiago's ruined hands and the marlin left as bones—provokes Manolin's renewed promise to return to fishing with the old man. Witnessing the full extent of the attacks deepens the boy's sorrow and his commitment, transforming the sharks’ destruction into a catalyst for the continuity between them.

Why does Santiago keep fighting the sharks even when defeat is inevitable?

Santiago continues to fight because stopping would breach his personal code of enduring hardship with dignity—the same principle he admires in Joe DiMaggio playing through pain. He wields the harpoon, then the knife, then the club, and finally the tiller, not to achieve victory but to resist surrender. For Hemingway, the ethical choice to not give up represents a true victory, even when the material result—the marlin—is completely lost.

How do the tourists' and Manolin's reactions to the sharks' destruction differ?

The tourists, seen at the end of the novella, mistake the enormous skeleton left by the sharks for a shark itself—failing to recognize the essence of Santiago's catch even as the size indicates something remarkable. Manolin, on the other hand, perceives the skeleton as evidence of catastrophic loss and heroic struggle, interpreting the destruction on a personal level and responding with grief and renewed loyalty instead of mere curiosity.

How does the progressive loss of weapons during the shark attacks structure the novella's climax?

Each wave of sharks diminishes Santiago's ability to resist: the Mako takes the harpoon, the galanos cost him the knife, later attacks splinter the club, and the final nocturnal raid forces him to swing the tiller in near-darkness. This increasing attrition mirrors Santiago's physical decline, giving the climax a relentless, cumulative logic—Hemingway's structural assertion that greatness can be realized but not maintained.

What is the ironic legacy the sharks leave behind at the end of the novella?

By devouring the marlin completely, the sharks reduce it to bare bones—yet those very bones, brought to harbor, astonish the onlookers and allow Manolin to recognize the magnitude of Santiago's accomplishment. The totality of the sharks' destruction erases the marlin's identity, yet the sheer size of the skeleton inadvertently acknowledges Santiago's achievement, presenting the novella's central paradox: the agents of loss become, contrary to expectation, instruments of recognition.

07·Essay angles

Use this in your essay

Tool · Essay angles

  • The sharks as indifference, not evil: Argue that Hemingway deliberately strips the sharks of malice to present a more honest symbol of the natural world's relationship to human ambition—not hostile, merely indifferent.

  • Attrition as structure: Trace how the progressive loss of weapons (harpoon → knife → club → tiller) mirrors Santiago's physical decline and analyze what this escalating cost reveals about Hemingway's conception of heroism.

  • Destruction as inadvertent testimony: Explore the paradox that the sharks, by reducing the marlin to bones, actually *create* the evidence of Santiago's greatness for those on shore—questioning what Hemingway implies about how achievement is recognized by the world.

  • The sharks and the DiMaggio code: Examine how Santiago's invocation of DiMaggio functions as a psychological counterweight to the sharks; what does it signify that he must summon a human ideal to endure a force operating entirely outside human values?

  • Pyrrhic victory and moral economy: Build a thesis around the novella's central tension—the sharks win physically but Santiago wins ethically—and assess whether Hemingway presents that ethical victory as sufficient compensation or as deeply ambivalent consolation.

The Old Man and the Sea

Continue

Full study guide →