Skip to content
Storgy

Character analysis

Jack Favell

in Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier

Jack Favell is Rebecca de Winter's cousin and secret lover, and he acts as the main antagonist after the investigation into Rebecca's death. He comes across as charming but is dissolute and morally bankrupt, working as a blackmailer while pretending to be grief-stricken. Favell makes his entrance lounging at Manderley uninvited, which immediately highlights his arrogant familiarity with the estate and his disdain for Maxim. His affair with Rebecca was well-known among her circle, and he shamelessly exploits this connection after her body is found.

Favell's key role surfaces during the inquest, where he tries to use Rebecca's last note to him—summoning him to Manderley the night she died—as evidence of Maxim's foul play. His motives are clearly self-serving: he threatens Colonel Julyan and Maxim with exposure unless they pay him off, revealing his cowardice behind his bravado. However, the investigation he instigates backfires dramatically when Dr. Baker reveals that Rebecca was dying of inoperable cancer, shattering any murder narrative and suggesting her death was a case of deliberate self-destruction.

Favell is vain, quick to smirk, and relies on a superficial charm that fools no one who looks closely. He interacts with women—including the narrator—with a condescending flirtatiousness that highlights his shallowness. In contrast to Mrs. Danvers, whose obsession with Rebecca is genuine, Favell's attachment is purely opportunistic. His story concludes in disgrace: the very inquiry he orchestrates undermines his power and reveals him as a man who truly understood Rebecca far less than he thought.

About this character

Form
Novel
Author
Daphne du Maurier
First published
1938

The person01–03

01·Who they are

Who is Jack Favell?

Jack Favell arrives at Manderley like a man who believes he owns the place. As Rebecca's cousin and long-term secret lover, he is first seen by the narrator lounging in the morning room, uninvited and entirely at ease, sipping a cocktail with the air of someone expecting to be accommodated. Du Maurier establishes his character with startling economy: he is handsome in a blowsy, overripe way, quick with a smile that stops short of his eyes, and possesses a charm calibrated entirely for his own advantage. Behind the easy manner lies something meaner — a dissolute opportunist who has coasted on Rebecca's reflected glamour and now, with her gone, scrambles to monetise even her death. He works, insofar as he works at all, as a car salesman, but his true vocation is exploitation. Du Maurier uses him to embody a particular English type: the charming wastrel whose social confidence conceals moral bankruptcy at every level.

02·Arc & motivation

What is Jack Favell's arc and motivation?

Favell's arc is one long, slow implosion. He enters the novel as a nuisance and exits it as a humiliated nonentity, with the devastating irony that his downfall is entirely self-engineered. His motivation throughout is money and self-preservation dressed up as justice for Rebecca. When her body is recovered from the sunken boat, Favell sees an opportunity: Rebecca's final note to him, summoning him to Manderley the night she died, seems to imply she had no intention of dying — and therefore that Maxim must have killed her. He pivots from uninvited house-guest to would-be blackmailer with barely a pause for grief. The confrontation scene, in which he demands payment from Maxim and Colonel Julyan in exchange for silence, makes his motives clear. He does not want justice; he wants money. His mistake — the one that unravels everything — is insisting the group track down Dr. Baker to demolish Maxim's alibi. Baker's revelation that Rebecca was dying of inoperable uterine cancer completely destroys the murder thesis, and Favell, who forced this inquiry himself, is left with nothing. His arc exemplifies hubris collapsed by its own mechanism.

03·Key moments

What are Jack Favell's key moments?

The first appearance at Manderley is crucial: his easy familiarity with the house — knowing where the drinks are kept, treating the staff as his own — signals that he has long inhabited a world he has no legitimate claim to. The narrator's immediate unease leads the reader to distrust him completely.

The confrontation with Maxim and Julyan is Favell at his most dangerous and revealing. Waving Rebecca's note like a winning hand, he makes his demand explicit. Julyan's quiet contempt during this scene is as damning as any direct accusation; Favell's bravado visibly falters before genuine authority.

The visit to Dr. Baker is the pivot on which the entire novel turns, and Favell insists on it. When Baker discloses the cancer diagnosis, the attention shifts to Favell's face, and what registers there — confusion, then deflation — marks his final reduction to irrelevance.

The cast04–05

04·Relationships

What are Jack Favell's most important relationships?

With Rebecca, the relationship was real in duration but shallow in understanding. He possessed her in a physical and social sense — their affair was an open secret in her circle — but the cancer revelation proves he had no access to her inner life. She summoned him to Manderley that last night without telling him why she was dying; she used him as a prop rather than confiding in him. His trump card is simultaneously proof of his ignorance of her.

With Maxim, the dynamic is pure rivalry and contempt without the complexity that might make it interesting. Favell detests Maxim as the man who displaced him, and Maxim regards Favell with cold disgust. Their scenes together crackle with mutual loathing kept just below the surface of social form.

With Mrs. Danvers, Favell is allied by shared hostility toward Maxim and nominal loyalty to Rebecca's memory, but this alliance exposes their difference. Danvers's devotion is a consuming, almost religious obsession; Favell's is a ledger entry. They use each other.

With the narrator, his patronising flirtatiousness — treating her as a naive girl playing dress-up in Rebecca's house — functions as a deliberate act of destabilisation. She sees through it, which is why he unsettles her.

05·Connected characters

How is Jack Favell connected to the other characters?

Rebecca de Winter

Favell was Rebecca's cousin and long-term secret lover, using their intimacy as the basis for his blackmail scheme after her death. Her final note summoning him to Manderley becomes his supposed trump card, yet the cancer revelation proves he never truly knew her motives or inner life.

Maxim de Winter

Favell despises Maxim and views him as a rival and target. He attempts to have Maxim charged with Rebecca's murder at the inquest, leveraging the note as evidence, but his scheme collapses when the cancer diagnosis is revealed, leaving him powerless against Maxim.

Colonel Julyan

Favell confronts Colonel Julyan directly, demanding money in exchange for silence about his suspicions. Julyan, unimpressed and quietly contemptuous, drives the investigation that ultimately vindicates Maxim and humiliates Favell.

Mrs. Danvers

Favell and Mrs. Danvers are allied in their devotion—or claimed devotion—to Rebecca's memory and their shared hostility toward Maxim. However, their bond is one of convenience; Danvers's grief is genuine obsession, while Favell's is largely self-serving.

Dr. Baker

Dr. Baker's testimony that Rebecca had inoperable cancer is the single fact that destroys Favell's blackmail plot. Favell himself insists on tracking Baker down, unwittingly engineering his own defeat.

The Unnamed Narrator (the second Mrs. de Winter)

Favell treats the narrator with patronizing flirtatiousness on his first visit to Manderley, immediately unsettling her. She recognises his moral emptiness and is repelled by him throughout, viewing him as a threat to Maxim.

Frank Crawley

Frank is quietly hostile to Favell, aware of his character and his history with Rebecca. Favell regards Frank with dismissive contempt, sensing in him a loyal obstacle to his schemes against Maxim.

Study06–07

06·Questions

Questions readers ask about Jack Favell

What is Jack Favell's relationship to Rebecca de Winter?

Favell is Rebecca's cousin and long-term secret lover, with their affair being widely known within her social circle. After her death, he uses this closeness as the basis for a blackmail scheme, claiming her final note to him as proof that Maxim murdered her. However, the revelation of her cancer indicates that despite his connection to her, he lacked true insight into her inner life or intentions.

Why does Jack Favell try to blackmail Maxim de Winter?

Favell's motivation is primarily financial and self-preserving, rather than seeking justice. Upon the recovery of Rebecca's body, he seizes her last note to him—summoning him to Manderley the night she died—as evidence that she did not intend to die, thereby making Maxim appear guilty of murder. He confronts Maxim and Colonel Julyan, demanding money for his silence, revealing that he views grief merely as a tool for profit.

How does Favell's blackmail plot against Maxim backfire?

Favell's scheme unravels entirely when he insists on finding Dr. Baker to undermine Maxim's alibi, only for Baker to reveal that Rebecca was dying of inoperable cancer. This diagnosis implies that Rebecca orchestrated her own death, dismantling the murder narrative. Favell's actions initiated the inquiry that led to his downfall; he exits the story defeated and powerless, exemplifying how hubris can lead to self-destruction.

Does Jack Favell genuinely grieve for Rebecca?

No — Favell's connection to Rebecca is strategic rather than sincere. He transitions from an uninvited guest to blackmailer with little regard for grief, viewing her death as a financial opportunity. Du Maurier contrasts him sharply with Mrs. Danvers, whose obsession with Rebecca is a genuine devotion; Favell's attachment resembles a ledger entry, and Rebecca's choice to conceal her cancer from him illustrates that she regarded him as a tool rather than a confidant.

What is the significance of Jack Favell's first appearance at Manderley?

Favell's initial appearance is intentionally disconcerting: he is discovered lounging in the morning room, relaxed and sipping a cocktail, behaving as if the house belongs to him. His knowledge of the drink location and easy interaction with the staff suggest a long-standing, assumed access to a space from which he has no legitimate entitlement. Du Maurier utilizes this moment to portray his arrogance and moral emptiness in a concise manner.

How does Jack Favell treat the narrator, and how does she respond?

Favell interacts with the narrator in a patronizingly flirtatious manner, diminishing her to a naive girl playing dress-up in Rebecca's home. This behavior aims to destabilize her confidence at Manderley. The narrator quickly sees through his act, recognizing his moral void and feeling repulsed by him throughout the novel; her clear perception signals her growing judgment and positions Favell as a clear threat to Maxim.

What does Rebecca's cancer revelation tell us about how well Jack Favell actually knew her?

The revelation highlights the significant limitations in Favell's understanding of Rebecca. She called him to Manderley on the night of her death without disclosing her terminal cancer, using him as a pawn rather than sharing her truth. The very note he uses as leverage paradoxically reveals his ignorance: despite their years of intimacy, he had no insight into her inner life, intentions, or her final, calculated act of self-destruction.

How does Favell's relationship with Mrs. Danvers compare to her relationship with Rebecca?

Favell and Mrs. Danvers are united by a common enmity toward Maxim and a surface-level allegiance to Rebecca's memory, but their alliance is purely convenient. Danvers's attachment to Rebecca is an all-consuming obsession, whereas Favell's motive is entirely self-serving. Du Maurier employs this contrast to illustrate that two individuals can oppose the same adversary for drastically different motives, showing that Favell's notion of 'loyalty' amounts to little more than a commercial exchange disguised as sorrow.

07·Essay angles

Use this in your essay

Tool · Essay angles

  • Favell as foil to Mrs. Danvers

    Both claim devotion to Rebecca and oppose Maxim, yet their motivations are radically different. How does du Maurier use this contrast to complicate the novel's treatment of loyalty and obsession?

  • The self-defeating antagonist

    Favell instigates the very inquiry that exonerates Maxim. Explore du Maurier's use of dramatic irony in Favell's arc and what it suggests about the nature of greed as a form of blindness.

  • Charm as moral camouflage

    Favell is repeatedly described as attractive and easy in company. Analyse how du Maurier constructs superficial charm as a signifier of danger, and how the narrator's response to Favell reflects her developing judgment throughout the novel.

  • Favell and class

    He inhabits Manderley's world without belonging to it, exploiting access rather than earning it. Consider how his character functions as a critique of a parasitic leisure class dependent on women's wealth and social capital.

  • Rebecca's agency

    The cancer revelation suggests Rebecca chose the manner and timing of her death without informing Favell. What does his ignorance of her plan reveal about the limits of his knowledge of her, and how does this posthumously reinforce Rebecca's control over her own narrative?

Rebecca

Continue

Full study guide →