Skip to content
Storgy

Character analysis

The Landlord

in Bartleby, the Scrivener by Herman Melville

The Landlord is a minor yet significant figure in Herman Melville's "Bartleby, the Scrivener," appearing in the story's final section after the Narrator has left his Wall Street office to escape Bartleby's unyielding presence. As the new occupant of the old office, the Landlord discovers Bartleby still haunting the building—lingering on the banisters, sleeping in the doorway, and refusing to leave. Frustrated and alarmed by Bartleby's strange persistence, the Landlord tracks down the Narrator at his new address and insists that he address the situation, claiming that Bartleby is "his man" and his responsibility. This encounter forces the Narrator back into an unwanted engagement with Bartleby, whom he had hoped to forget.

The Landlord acts as an agent of social and economic order—a representative of property rights and societal norms who cannot understand, let alone tolerate, Bartleby's passive refusal to engage with the world. Unlike the Narrator, who feels a mix of sympathy and frustration, the Landlord is simply impatient. His failure to remove Bartleby himself highlights how completely Bartleby challenges conventional social structures. Ultimately, it is the Landlord who escalates the situation by having Bartleby arrested and sent to the Tombs prison, sealing Bartleby's fate. Although he appears in just a few scenes, the Landlord is the key catalyst for Bartleby's imprisonment and death, making him one of the story's most impactful secondary characters.

About this character

Form
Short story
Author
Herman Melville
First published
1853

The person01–03

01·Who they are

Who is The Landlord?

The Landlord is a property owner on Wall Street who becomes the de facto inheritor of Bartleby's unsolicited tenancy once the Narrator vacates his chambers. He appears only in the story's final movement, yet his few scenes carry decisive weight. Melville renders him as a type rather than a fully individuated person: a man defined entirely by his relationship to property, order, and the law. He is unnamed, a detail that underscores his function as an embodiment of institutional force rather than a character with interior life. His impatience is uncomplicated by the ethical hand-wringing that torments the Narrator throughout—he simply wants his building cleared, his investment protected, and the anomaly resolved.

02·Arc & motivation

What is The Landlord's arc and motivation?

The Landlord has no arc in the psychological sense; he moves in a straight line from irritation to legal action. His motivation is transparent and singular: Bartleby is a nuisance, a blot on respectable commercial property, and must be removed. When the Narrator abandons his chambers hoping to leave Bartleby behind, the Landlord discovers that Bartleby has simply expanded his occupation—lingering in doorways, sleeping on the banisters, drifting through the building's common spaces. The Landlord cannot comprehend passive resistance; he has no category for it. His response is therefore instinctive and institutional: locate the person he deems responsible (the Narrator), compel that person to act, and, when that fails, call the constable. His trajectory from complaint to arrest is the trajectory of property law made flesh.

03·Key moments

What are The Landlord's key moments?

The Landlord's most important action is hunting down the Narrator at his new address and insisting, pointedly, that Bartleby is "your man" and therefore the Narrator's problem to solve. This single confrontation drives the story's closing plot. It is an act of displacement—he refuses to absorb any portion of responsibility for the human being haunting his building, and the legal and moral weight he shunts onto the Narrator is weight the Narrator equally cannot carry. The Landlord's second decisive moment is having Bartleby arrested and taken to the Tombs when the Narrator's final attempt to relocate Bartleby fails. He does not visit the Tombs, does not follow up, does not register Bartleby's death—his involvement ends cleanly the moment legal process takes over. That clean exit is itself a characterization.

The cast04–05

04·Relationships

What are The Landlord's most important relationships?

With Bartleby: The Landlord and Bartleby never exchange meaningful words, which is the point. Bartleby's "I would prefer not to" dissolves the social contracts the Landlord depends upon, and the Landlord has no language to meet it. He can only escalate—from complaint, to demand, to law. His decision to have Bartleby imprisoned is not sadistic; it is almost administrative, which makes it more chilling. He represents the wall that Bartleby's passive resistance ultimately cannot outlast.

With the Narrator: The Landlord's pursuit of the Narrator is coercive and reveals the limits of the Narrator's earlier self-congratulatory charity. The Narrator had hoped that relocating his offices amounted to moral closure; the Landlord demolishes that hope by reassigning responsibility. In doing so he functions almost as a plot mechanism, but also as an ironic mirror: both men want Bartleby to simply vanish, and neither can make it happen through goodwill alone.

With the Grub-Man: Though their scenes do not overlap directly, the Landlord and the Grub-Man bracket Bartleby's final phase. The Landlord delivers him to the Tombs; the Grub-Man receives him there. Together they constitute the interlocking machinery of commercial society—property law, incarceration, transactional hospitality—that surrounds and ultimately destroys Bartleby without ever understanding him.

05·Connected characters

How is The Landlord connected to the other characters?

Bartleby

The Landlord is Bartleby's most immediate antagonist in the story's final act.

Full commentary

The Landlord is Bartleby's most immediate antagonist in the story's final act. Unable to evict or reason with Bartleby, who continues to occupy the vacated Wall Street building, the Landlord ultimately has him arrested and sent to the Tombs—an act that directly precipitates Bartleby's death. He represents the indifferent force of property and law that Bartleby's passive resistance cannot ultimately withstand.

The Narrator (The Lawyer)

The Landlord pursues the Narrator to his new offices, insisting he take responsibility for Bartleby. This confrontation re-entangles the Narrator in Bartleby's fate after he had tried to sever all ties. The Landlord's pressure exposes the limits of the Narrator's charity and forces him to make one last, failed attempt to relocate Bartleby before the Landlord takes legal action.

The Grub-Man

Both the Landlord and the Grub-Man are figures of institutional routine who interact with Bartleby in the story's closing scenes. While the Landlord engineers Bartleby's imprisonment, the Grub-Man encounters him inside the Tombs. Together they represent the social machinery—property, incarceration, commerce—that closes in on Bartleby at the end.

Study06–07

06·Questions

Questions readers ask about The Landlord

Who does the Landlord hold responsible for Bartleby?

The Landlord insists that Bartleby is the Narrator's man and therefore the Narrator's problem to solve. After discovering Bartleby lingering in doorways and sleeping on the banisters of the vacated Wall Street building, the Landlord tracks the Narrator down at his new address and refuses to absorb any share of responsibility. This confrontation re-entangles the Narrator in Bartleby's fate just when he had hoped to leave it behind.

What does the Landlord do to Bartleby in the end?

The Landlord has Bartleby arrested and sent to the Tombs prison, an act that directly precipitates Bartleby's death. When the Narrator's final attempt to relocate Bartleby fails, the Landlord calls the constable and allows the legal process to take over. He does not visit the Tombs afterward and shows no further interest in Bartleby—his involvement ends the moment institutional authority steps in.

Why can't the Landlord simply remove Bartleby himself?

Bartleby's passive resistance dissolves the social contracts the Landlord depends upon, leaving him with no effective tool short of legal force. Bartleby never threatens, argues, or negotiates—he simply stays, and the Landlord has no category for that kind of refusal. His inability to evict Bartleby through ordinary means highlights how thoroughly Bartleby's quiet immobility challenges conventional social and economic structures.

Is the Landlord a villain in "Bartleby, the Scrivener"?

The Landlord acts as an embodiment of institutional indifference—his decision to have Bartleby imprisoned appears more administrative than sadistic, which Melville suggests makes it more chilling. He is motivated by property rights and social order, not personal malice. Melville renders him as a type rather than a fully individuated character, using his unnamed, uncomplicated impatience to critique systemic indifference rather than individual cruelty.

How does the Landlord's relationship with Bartleby differ from the Narrator's?

Unlike the Narrator, who is tormented by sympathy, guilt, and ethical hand-wringing throughout the story, the Landlord feels nothing more complicated than impatience. He and Bartleby never exchange meaningful words, and the Landlord makes no attempt to understand Bartleby's condition. Where the Narrator agonises over his moral responsibility, the Landlord treats Bartleby as a practical nuisance to be cleared by whatever institutional means are available.

What role does the Landlord play alongside the Grub-Man?

Together, the Landlord and the Grub-Man represent the interlocking machinery of commercial society that surrounds Bartleby at the story's close. The Landlord delivers Bartleby to the Tombs through the mechanism of property law, while the Grub-Man receives him there through the mechanism of transactional hospitality. Neither understands Bartleby; both process him as a unit within a routine system, illustrating Melville's critique of institutional indifference.

Why is the Landlord never given a name in the story?

The Landlord remains unnamed because Melville defines him entirely by his function—property ownership and the authority it confers—rather than by any interior life. His anonymity parallels Bartleby's own, and both figures are identified by social role rather than personal identity. This parallel invites readers to see both men as products of capitalist order: one passively resisting it, the other unreflectively enforcing it.

07·Essay angles

Use this in your essay

Tool · Essay angles

  • Property as moral authority: Argue that the Landlord exposes how property rights function as a substitute for ethical reasoning in the story's social world—his ownership of the building is treated as sufficient justification for every escalating action he takes.

  • The limits of sympathy: Compare the Landlord's brusque impatience with the Narrator's extended agonising to argue that Melville suggests sympathy, however genuine, is as ineffectual as indifference when social structures remain unchanged.

  • Naming and anonymity: Both the Landlord and Bartleby are defined by function rather than proper names; explore what Melville achieves by stripping these figures of individual identity and what that parallel implies about their relationship to capitalist order.

  • Catalyst vs. cause: Examine whether the Landlord should be read as the proximate cause of Bartleby's death or merely the final instrument in a chain of causation that begins with Wall Street's dehumanising conditions—and what that distinction means for the story's moral argument.

  • Institutional indifference: Use the Landlord as a lens to argue that "Bartleby" critiques not individual cruelty but the systemic indifference built into legal and commercial institutions, which process human beings without registering them as human.

Bartleby, the Scrivener

Continue

Full study guide →