Skip to content
Storgy

Character analysis

Colonel Sartoris

in A Rose for Emily by William Faulkner

Colonel Sartoris is a significant yet mostly unseen character in Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily," casting a long shadow over the entire narrative through his decisions. As the former mayor of Jefferson, he orchestrates the tax exemption that spares Emily Grierson from paying municipal taxes—a decision he backs with a fabricated story about a loan her father made to the town. This act of upper-class paternalism, rooted in the Old South's code of noblesse oblige, effectively traps Emily in a state of civic limbo, protecting her from the realities of modern life even after his death. By the time the story takes place, Sartoris is already gone; the narrator notes that only Emily—holding onto his myth—still believes the tax exemption is legitimate, while a new generation of aldermen doesn't even recognize his name. Although he never appears directly, his presence lingers in the narrative as a symbol of the antebellum social structure that Jefferson is gradually outgrowing. His defining characteristics—authority, a chivalrous sense of protectiveness, and a readiness to distort the truth for the sake of appearances—reflect the values that influenced both Emily and her father, establishing him as a foundational element in the story's exploration of the South's struggle to move on from its past.

About this character

Form
Short story
Author
William Faulkner
First published
1930

The person01–03

01·Who they are

Who is Colonel Sartoris?

Colonel Sartoris is a former mayor of Jefferson, Mississippi, who never speaks a word and never appears in a scene, yet whose authority organizes the entire social world of "A Rose for Emily." Faulkner introduces him almost casually, in a single explanatory sentence near the story's opening: Sartoris had remitted Emily Grierson's taxes "into perpetuity" after her father's death, concocting a cover story that old Mr. Grierson had once made a substantial loan to the town. That brief reference establishes him as the presiding patriarch of Jefferson's old order — a man whose decisions outlive him, whose fabrications become civic record, and whose name eventually means nothing to the next generation of aldermen who arrive at Emily's door with tax notices in hand. He epitomizes the Old South: authoritative, protective, and profoundly willing to falsify reality to maintain appearances.

02·Arc & motivation

What is Colonel Sartoris's arc and motivation?

Since Sartoris exists entirely in the story's past, he has no arc in the conventional sense — he is fixed, finished, already dead when the narrative begins. His motivation, however, is clear through the consequences of his one recorded action. Operating from the code of noblesse oblige that defined antebellum Southern aristocracy, he cannot allow Emily — a Grierson, a woman of standing — to face the indignity of municipal tax demands while widows and daughters of lesser families go unprotected. The invented loan story reveals something important about his character: he is not merely generous but dishonest in a manner so comfortable it barely registers as dishonest. For Sartoris, sustaining the myth of the old order holds more value than any factual accounting. His motivation is cultural preservation disguised as personal kindness.

03·Key moments

What are Colonel Sartoris's key moments?

  • The tax remission decree (Section I): This is Sartoris's sole documented act. The narrator specifies that the colonel "fathered the edict" and that the fictional loan was invented "only a man of Colonel Sartoris's generation and thought" could have concocted or believed — Faulkner's narrator treats both the chivalry and the deception as generationally inseparable.
  • The fading of his name (Section I): When the next generation of aldermen contacts Emily, the narrator notes that Sartoris has been dead "almost ten years." The new officials do not operate by his code, and by implication, they likely no longer remember the reasoning behind the exemption at all. His name is briefly invoked in Emily's letter to them, but to modern Jefferson, it lands as an irrelevance.
  • Emily's continued belief (Section I): The narrator remarks that Colonel Sartoris had been dead "almost ten years" and that "only a woman could have believed" the invented story. Emily's unwavering citation of his authority long after his death makes him a kind of ghost, still structuring her understanding of the world.

The cast04–05

04·Relationships

What are Colonel Sartoris's most important relationships?

Emily Grierson is Sartoris's primary object of paternalism. He treats her not as a citizen with obligations but as a relic to be curated — financially insulating her from civic life in a manner that mirrors exactly how Mr. Grierson kept her sequestered socially. In protecting Emily, Sartoris deepens her incapacity to exist in any world that does not defer to her status. The relationship is wholly transactional on his side and wholly idealized on hers.

Mr. Grierson is woven into Sartoris's fictional history through the invented loan. The two patriarchs are posthumously confederated — Sartoris borrows Grierson's name and the town's imagined debt to justify his chivalric intervention, suggesting a class solidarity that persists even after death.

Judge Stevens carries Sartoris's approach forward in the story's present tense, refusing to confront Emily directly about the neighborhood smell. His deference — "Dammit, sir, will you accuse a lady to her face of smelling bad?" — is the living residue of Sartoris's institutional paternalism.

The narrator uses Sartoris as a historical calibration point, measuring the town's distance from its past by how thoroughly his name and decree have been forgotten.

05·Connected characters

How is Colonel Sartoris connected to the other characters?

Emily Grierson

Sartoris is Emily's civic protector and enabler. His fabricated tax-remission decree keeps her financially insulated and socially frozen, treating her less as a citizen than as a relic to be preserved—an act of chivalry that ultimately deepens her isolation.

Mr. Grierson

Sartoris invents a story about a loan from Mr. Grierson to the town as the pretext for Emily's tax exemption, posthumously linking the two patriarchs and suggesting a shared class solidarity between the old Jefferson families.

Judge Stevens

Both men represent the old-guard leadership of Jefferson. Judge Stevens inherits Sartoris's paternalistic approach to Emily, refusing to confront her directly about the smell complaint, reflecting the same chivalric deference Sartoris institutionalized.

The Narrator

The narrator invokes Sartoris as a historical reference point, using his death and the fading memory of his decree to measure how far Jefferson has drifted from the old order—making Sartoris a benchmark for the town's generational change.

Study06–07

06·Questions

Questions readers ask about Colonel Sartoris

What does Colonel Sartoris do for Emily Grierson in 'A Rose for Emily'?

Colonel Sartoris remits Emily Grierson's municipal taxes "into perpetuity" after her father's death, exempting her from all civic financial obligations for the rest of her life. To justify the decree, he invents a story that old Mr. Grierson had once made a substantial loan to the town — a fabrication so smoothly executed that it becomes official civic record, shielding Emily from the realities of modern Jefferson long after Sartoris himself is gone.

Why does Colonel Sartoris invent a fake loan story instead of simply granting Emily a tax exemption?

Sartoris invents the loan story because the code of noblesse oblige he operates under demands that charity to a woman of Emily's standing be disguised as a debt repaid rather than a favor granted. Openly exempting her would be an admission of pity, which the old Southern aristocratic order could not tolerate. For Sartoris, sustaining the myth of the old order holds more value than any factual accounting — cultural preservation is dressed up as personal kindness.

How does Colonel Sartoris's relationship with Emily Grierson mirror her father's treatment of her?

Both men deny Emily agency while framing their control as protection. Mr. Grierson kept Emily socially sequestered, and Sartoris financially insulates her from civic life, treating her not as a citizen with obligations but as a relic to be curated. In protecting her, Sartoris deepens her incapacity to exist in any world that does not defer to her status — his chivalry is, in practice, indistinguishable from her father's domination.

What is the significance of Colonel Sartoris's name being forgotten by the new aldermen?

The fading of Sartoris's name measures how far Jefferson has drifted from its past. The narrator notes he has been dead "almost ten years" when the new aldermen arrive at Emily's door with tax notices, and they do not recognize his authority or the reasoning behind the exemption. His irrelevance to modern Jefferson illustrates the story's central theme: the old Southern order persists through its consequences — Emily's isolation, her delusions — long after the men who built it have been forgotten.

Does Colonel Sartoris ever appear directly in 'A Rose for Emily'?

No — Colonel Sartoris never appears in a scene and never speaks a word in the story. Faulkner introduces him almost casually in one explanatory sentence near the opening, establishing his tax-remission decree as fact and then moving on. His complete absence from the narrative is significant: Faulkner uses it to argue that patriarchal authority in the old South is most powerful when it is invisible, systemic, and unquestioned.

How is Colonel Sartoris connected to Mr. Grierson in the story?

Sartoris posthumously links himself to Mr. Grierson by inventing a story that Grierson had once made a substantial loan to the town — a fiction that serves as the legal-sounding pretext for Emily's tax exemption. This fabricated history confederates the two patriarchs even after both are dead, suggesting a class solidarity between the old Jefferson families that persists beyond the grave and continues to shape Emily's life.

How does Judge Stevens carry on Colonel Sartoris's legacy in 'A Rose for Emily'?

Judge Stevens inherits Sartoris's paternalistic approach to Emily, refusing to confront her directly about the neighborhood smell complaint with the line "Dammit, sir, will you accuse a lady to her face of smelling bad?" His deference is the living residue of the institutional chivalry Sartoris established — both men prioritize the appearance of decorum and the protection of Emily's dignity over any practical or honest reckoning with the problems she presents.

Is Colonel Sartoris a villain in 'A Rose for Emily'?

Sartoris is not a villain in any conventional sense, but Faulkner frames his actions as deeply harmful despite their benevolent surface. His tax-remission decree, rooted in Old South noblesse oblige, traps Emily in civic and psychological stasis, deepening her isolation and her inability to engage with the modern world. The narrator notes that only a man of his "generation and thought" could have concocted — or believed — his fabricated story, treating both the chivalry and the deception as two sides of the same damaging coin.

07·Essay angles

Use this in your essay

Tool · Essay angles

  • The patriarch as institution

    Argue that Sartoris functions less as a character than as a system — that Faulkner uses his absence to show how Old South ideology perpetuates itself without requiring any individual to consciously uphold it.

  • Lying as social glue

    Examine how Sartoris's fabricated loan story reflects the story's broader theme that the South's identity depends on constructed, collectively maintained fictions.

  • Chivalry as control

    Build a thesis on how Sartoris's "protection" of Emily is indistinguishable from her father's control — both men deny her agency under the banner of honor.

  • Generational forgetting

    Use the erasure of Sartoris's name to argue that Jefferson's real tragedy is not Emily's madness but the town's inability to reckon honestly with the values it has quietly abandoned.

  • The unseen patriarch

    Analyze how Faulkner's decision to keep Sartoris entirely off-page reinforces the story's argument that patriarchal authority in the South is most powerful — and most dangerous — when it is invisible, systemic, and unquestioned.

A Rose for Emily

Continue

Full study guide →