Skip to content
Storgy

Year 12–13 / Grades 11–12

The Tollund Man — two lessons

Lesson 1 begins with the three numbered sections of the poem being read aloud in full. It then demonstrates how Heaney portrays the Tollund Man as a sacrificial saint through his choice of words and sentence structure in section I ("I could risk blasphemy…"). Students will annotate sections II and III on their own, focusing on the transition from reverence to political grief and finally to a sense of alienated belonging. Lesson 2 shifts from reading to writing: the teacher shows how to incorporate quotations and context into a comparative analytical paragraph using "lost, / unhappy and at home," after which students will write a complete timed exam-style paragraph. By the end, the class will be able to analyze Heaney's language and structure and craft a well-supported argument about sacrifice and memory.

Objectives

  • Analyse how Heaney uses diction, syntax and religious register in sections I–III to construct the Tollund Man as both sacrificial victim and secular saint.
  • Identify and explain the structural function of the poem's three numbered sections, showing how each shifts the speaker's emotional and geographical position.
  • Trace the connection Heaney draws between Iron Age ritual killing and modern sectarian murder in Northern Ireland, using specific quotations from sections I and II.
  • Evaluate the tension in the closing phrase 'lost, / unhappy and at home,' explaining how it encapsulates the poem's central argument about violence, memory and belonging.
  • Write an evidenced analytical paragraph that integrates quotation, contextual knowledge of the Troubles and P. V. Glob's The Bog People, and a clear interpretive claim.

The sequence

  1. Lesson 1: What the Bog Holds: Close Reading Sections I–III of 'The Tollund Man'

    55 min · ch. 1
    Do now

    Without looking at notes, I can say that the Northern Irish Troubles were a period of conflict primarily between nationalists, who wanted to unite Ireland, and unionists, who wanted to remain part of the UK. It involved political, social, and sectarian violence that lasted for several decades, significantly affecting the lives of many in Northern Ireland. As for a peat bog, I think it might serve as a metaphor for memory, representing how the past can be buried and preserved beneath layers of time, much like how peat forms over centuries.

    Teacher input

    Read section I aloud ('Some day I will go to Aarhus… bridegroom to the goddess'). Examine how the phrase 'I could risk blasphemy' functions: the modal 'could' indicates uncertainty, while 'blasphemy' brings in a religious tone, elevating the Tollund Man to a sacred status. The enjambment between 'blasphemy / Consecrate' embodies the very act of consecration it describes. Emphasize to students that Heaney isn't merely depicting a corpse — he is crafting a ritual, with the speaker acting as its priest. Annotate the passage on the board, highlighting diction, syntax, and register collectively.

    Independent task

    Students will annotate their copies of sections II and III, working quietly for fifteen minutes. In section II, they need to find at least two instances where Heaney shifts from the Danish past to the Irish present—quoting the exact lines and writing a sentence to explain the linguistic or structural elements that facilitate this transition. For instance, they might discuss the sudden mention of "four young brothers, trailed / for miles along the lines" and how the precision of "four" and "miles" ties myth to real events. In section III, students should write two sentences about how the Jutland landscape—described as "flat countries," "umber," and "dark-bowelled"—reflects Ulster, along with one sentence addressing why the poem concludes with a paradox instead of a clear resolution. Finally, students will submit their annotated copies, complete with marginal notes and the written sentences.

    Exit ticket

    In exactly two sentences, explain why Heaney uses the word 'pray' in section I and what it tells us about whether he believes poetry can actually redeem the dead.

  2. Lesson 2: 'Lost, Unhappy and at Home': Writing an Analytical Paragraph on Sacrifice and Belonging

    55 min · ch. 1
    Do now

    The paradox "unhappy and at home" in the final four lines of 'The Tollund Man' suggests a sense of belonging that is overshadowed by sorrow, highlighting how one can feel a profound connection to a place yet still experience deep dissatisfaction. The word "unhappy" stands out to me as surprising because it contrasts sharply with the idea of being "at home," which typically evokes feelings of comfort and safety.

    Teacher input

    Heaney closes the poem not with resolution but with a deliberately paradoxical acceptance of violence as the shared condition of ancient Jutland and modern Ulster. The phrase "lost," followed by a line break, creates a pause that enacts the disorientation experienced by the speaker, which is then confirmed by "unhappy." This moment captures the speaker's deep sense of alienation, reflecting broader themes found in P. V. Glob's The Bog People, where the past continuously echoes in the present. Furthermore, the speaker's disconnection is not just personal but political, as it implicates the ongoing Troubles in Northern Ireland, revealing how historical violence shapes contemporary identity. By employing the term "enacts" throughout, the analysis remains focused on how these elements interact, avoiding mere plot summary and instead emphasizing the complexities of loss, disappointment, and belonging—ultimately culminating in the haunting refrain "lost, / unhappy and at home."

    Independent task

    Heaney uses the figure of the Tollund Man to delve into the unsettling connection between ancient rituals and contemporary political violence. By referring to the Tollund Man as a “bridegroom to the goddess,” Heaney evokes a sense of sacredness around the sacrificial act, utilizing a reverent diction that contrasts sharply with the brutal violence of modern conflicts. This phrase suggests a deep spiritual significance behind ancient practices, hinting at a time when human life was intertwined with the divine. In contrast, the portrayal of “four young brothers” in a later section brings forth a stark, painful image of familial loss amid modern strife. The syntax here conveys a sense of abruptness, emphasizing the suddenness of their demise and the everyday nature of violence in Heaney's context. The line break after “lost,” serves to heighten the emotional weight of their absence, leaving readers to grapple with the silence that follows. Ultimately, Heaney’s method of intertwining these historical references reflects the turbulent backdrop of the Troubles, where ancient echoes of sacrifice resonate uncomfortably with the realities of modern sectarian conflict.

    Exit ticket

    Write one sentence explaining what you think Heaney's poem ultimately argues: does it suggest that poetry can redeem victims of political violence, or does it accept that it cannot — and which single word or phrase from the poem most supports your answer?

Activities

Bog Body Image Gallery Walk 10 min · whole class

Display five photographs of the Tollund Man (the head, the noose, the peat context) on the board or printed on desks. Students will quietly circulate or observe for three minutes, then write three words in response to each image. The class will then share their words on the board; the teacher will highlight any that Heaney himself uses ('mild,' 'dark,' 'serene'), linking them to the poem's language. Students will return their three-word lists.

Section-by-Section Tracking Grid 15 min · pairs

Each pair gets a printed grid featuring three columns — one for each section of the poem — and four rows labeled: Setting, Speaker's Emotion, Key Quotation, and Technique. Pairs fill in the grid by re-reading the poem together, then they compare their work with another pair. The finished grid is submitted and serves as a revision resource. The teacher ensures that 'four young brothers' from section II and 'outlandish yet homely' from section III are in the right columns.

Register Colour-Code Annotation 12 min · individual

Students receive a clean copy of section I ('Some day I will go to Aarhus… bridegroom to the goddess'). They use three coloured pens to underline different elements: phrases with a religious tone in red ('blasphemy,' 'consecrate,' 'saint's kept body'), descriptions of the body or physical features in blue ('peat-brown shroud,' 'mild pods of his eyelids'), and action words or expressions of desire in green ('will go,' 'could risk,' 'pray'). Below the poem, students write a sentence reflecting on what the dominance of one colour reveals about Heaney's priorities in this section. They then submit the annotated sheet.

Paradox Unpacking Discussion 10 min · groups

Groups of three receive the final stanza on a card: 'Out there in Jutland / In the old man-killing parishes / I will feel lost, / Unhappy and at home.' Each group needs to come to a consensus on one interpretation of 'unhappy and at home' and one reason why Heaney includes a line-break after 'lost.' A spokesperson will present the group's answer. Students will return a single sticky note per group that captures their agreed interpretation in one sentence.

Context Card Matching 10 min · pairs

Pairs receive eight context cards—four related to P. V. Glob's The Bog People and Iron Age sacrifice, and four concerning the Northern Irish Troubles from 1969 to 1972—along with eight quotation cards from the poem. They match each quotation to the context card that fits best and write a sentence explaining each connection. The matched pairs and explanations are returned on a single sheet, allowing the teacher to quickly assess whether students can link historical context with specific language.

Timed Paragraph Peer Assessment 15 min · pairs

After the independent writing task in Lesson 2, students exchange paragraphs and refer to a three-question checklist: (1) Does the paragraph begin with a clear interpretive claim — not just a fact about the poem? (2) Are both quotations integrated into the student's own syntax instead of appearing as block quotes? (3) Does the closing sentence mention the Troubles or Glob? Peer assessors write one 'strength' sentence and one 'develop' sentence on a sticky note attached to the paragraph. Both the paragraph and the sticky note are submitted to the teacher.

Assessment

  • Do-Now (Lesson 1): checks prior knowledge of the Troubles and readiness to think metaphorically about landscape before the poem is read.
  • Annotated copy of sections II and III (Lesson 1 independent task): checks whether students can locate specific moments of temporal shift and explain the linguistic feature that creates them.
  • Exit ticket (Lesson 1): checks whether students understand that Heaney's use of 'pray' signals doubt about poetry's redemptive power, not confident faith in it.
  • Do-Now (Lesson 2): checks whether students can identify paradox and notice surprising diction before teacher input begins.
  • Exit ticket (Lesson 2): checks whether students can form an interpretive argument about the poem's final position on poetry and redemption, and anchor it in a specific word or phrase.

Summative task

Write one analytical paragraph of 180–220 words in response to the question: 'How does Heaney use the figure of the Tollund Man to explore the relationship between ancient ritual and modern political violence?' Your paragraph must open with a clear interpretive claim; embed at least two quotations — one from section I and one from section II or III — with a comment on a specific language feature in each; and close with a sentence that connects Heaney's method to its historical context (the Troubles or P. V. Glob's The Bog People). Do not retell the poem.

Marking notes

``json { "Top band": "The student presents a detailed argument, such as suggesting that Heaney involves the speaker in the ritual logic he mourns. They also discuss how elements like the modal 'could,' the enjambment in 'lost,' and the religious tone of 'blasphemy' contribute to the poem's meaning, going beyond just stating their definitions.", "Middle band": "The response shows an accurate understanding of the text and includes some analysis of language, but the argument remains broad, like saying 'Heaney depicts violence negatively.'", "Lower band": "The answer rephrases the poem's storyline, includes quotes without analysis, and mentions context without linking it to specific language choices." } ``

Standards covered

Common Core 11 12
  • RL.11-12.1 — cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
  • RL.11-12.4 — determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyse the impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone.
  • RL.11-12.5 — analyse how an author's choices concerning how to structure specific parts of a text contribute to its overall structure and meaning.
  • W.11-12.9 — draw evidence from literary texts to support analysis, reflection and research.
AP Literature
  • Literary Argumentation (Skill 1.A) — make a defensible claim about the whole poem that requires defence through evidence and analysis.
  • Explain the function of structure (Skill 2.B) — explain how the three-part numbered structure of 'The Tollund Man' contributes to the development of the speaker's argument.
  • Explain the function of word choice and imagery (Skill 3.B) — analyse how Heaney's diction ('blasphemy,' 'bridegroom,' 'outlandish yet homely') and imagery of the bog body shape meaning and tone.
  • Use of evidence (Skill 7.B) — select and use relevant evidence from the poem to support an interpretive claim, embedding quotation within the student's own syntax.
AQA
  • AO1 — articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology, and coherent, accurate written expression.
  • AO2 — analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts, including Heaney's use of religious register, enjambment and paradox in 'The Tollund Man.'
  • AO3 — demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which literary texts are written and received, specifically the Northern Irish Troubles (1969–1972) and P. V. Glob's The Bog People.
  • AO4 — explore connections across literary texts, relevant where students compare 'The Tollund Man' with other poems in the Heaney selection or wider reading.
Edexcel
  • AO1 — articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology and coherent, accurate written expression.
  • AO2 — analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in Heaney's use of structure, diction and imagery across the three sections of 'The Tollund Man.'
  • AO3 — demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which 'The Tollund Man' was written (Troubles, 1969–1972) and received (critical debate about aestheticising political violence).
IB Lit
  • Criterion A — knowledge, understanding and interpretation: demonstrate understanding of the poem's three-part structure and the speaker's shifting relationship to the Tollund Man, the Troubles and the Jutland landscape.
  • Criterion B — analysis and evaluation: analyse how Heaney's choices of diction, syntax and form (enjambment, numbered sections, paradox) shape meaning and achieve effects.
  • Criterion D — language: use precise, subject-specific vocabulary and embed quotation effectively in analytical writing.

Storgy generator

Plan it for your class instead

Choose the curriculum, the year group, how many lessons you have, and what the sequence should be about. Grounded in Storgy's analysis of The Tollund Man.

Plan The Tollund Man for your class1 credit
The Tollund ManSeamus Heaney

Powered by Claude. One credit per plan. First run free — no signup.