In your essay, make sure to:

• Develop a clear, defensible thesis that takes a stance on how Maupassant expresses his critique.
• Use specific textual evidence (direct quotes or paraphrases) to back up your argument.
• Analyze how literary devices — like irony, characterization, and plot structure — enhance the story's thematic message.
• Discuss the story's twist ending and explain how it either reinforces or complicates your main argument.
• Conclude with reflections on the broader social commentary Maupassant may be making regarding 19th-century French society.

Tip

Think about how the necklace itself acts as a symbol — what does it signify at the beginning of the story compared to the end?

In your essay, be sure to:

• Introduce a clear thesis that states your position on how Maupassant develops this critique via Mathilde's character journey.
• Analyze at least two or three specific moments in the text (for example, Mathilde's discontent with her life, her actions at the ball, and the shocking truth about the necklace's value) to support your argument.
• Examine how literary devices like irony, characterization, and setting strengthen Maupassant's thematic message.
• Consider the story's twist ending and explain how it serves not only as a plot surprise but also as a moral and thematic statement regarding the costs of pride and self-deception.
• Conclude by reflecting on the wider social commentary the story presents about class, ambition, and the pursuit of appearances in 19th-century French society.

Length

4–6 paragraphs (or as directed by your teacher)

Format

Standard literary essay with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion