Skip to content
Storgy

Character analysis

Time (Personified Force)

in An Arundel Tomb by Philip Larkin

Time in Philip Larkin's "An Arundel Tomb" isn't presented as a character in the traditional way; instead, it's a personified, destructive force that silently shapes the poem's main tension. Time acts as an enemy to permanence, slowly wearing down the stone figures of the Earl and Countess over the centuries. Larkin reveals Time's effects through the tomb's physical features: the Latin names that are "half-effaced," the faded heraldic symbols, and the figures' posture, which has outlasted its original meaning due to Time's influence. Time presents a paradox—it destroys context and intention but simultaneously preserves the physical image of their joined hands, allowing that gesture to gather emotional weight it might not have held initially. In the second-to-last stanza, Larkin points out Time's role directly: "Time has transfigured them into / Untruth." This moment stands out sharply—Time doesn't just erase; it actively transforms, changing what might have been a minor sculptural detail into a symbol of love as interpreted by later generations. The poem illustrates Time's journey from gradual erasure to ironic preservation: as it wears down the tomb, the remaining gesture becomes even more expressive. Ultimately, Time serves as the lens through which the poem questions if love—or any human truth—can endure across generations, ending with the well-known, ambiguous line: "What will survive of us is love."

About this character

Form
Short story
Author
Philip Larkin
First published
1964

The person01–03

01·Who they are

Who is Time (Personified Force)?

Time in "An Arundel Tomb" functions as the poem's silent, sovereign antagonist — a force whose long, patient work shapes everything the speaker and reader can perceive. Larkin presents Time as neither benevolent nor straightforwardly cruel; it is indifferent, operating across centuries with an erosive momentum that no human craft or feeling can fully withstand. Its presence saturates every stanza, felt in the worn stone, the fading inscriptions, and the gap between what the sculptor intended and what survives. Far from being a background abstraction, Time is the poem's engine: without its centuries of labour, there would be no ambiguity, no emotional charge, and ultimately no poem.

02·Arc & motivation

What is Time (Personified Force)'s arc and motivation?

Time has no motivation in any conscious sense, which makes it unsettling. Its arc is simply the arc of erosion moving toward a kind of ironic transformation. In the poem's early stanzas, Time works as a destroyer, gradually stripping away the identifiers that gave the tomb its original meaning — the "Latin names" grow "half-effaced," the heraldic detail fades. This is the slow, grinding phase of Time's operation. But Larkin pivots sharply in the penultimate stanza with the observation that "Time has transfigured them into / Untruth." Here Time crosses from mere erosion into active distortion. It does not simply delete; it rewrites. By removing context, it allows the clasped hands — likely a compositional convention for the sculptor rather than an expression of personal devotion — to accumulate emotional meaning they were never designed to carry. Time's arc is therefore paradoxical: it diminishes and, through that very diminishment, amplifies.

03·Key moments

What are Time (Personified Force)'s key moments?

The most critical moment attributed to Time is the line "Time has transfigured them into / Untruth" (stanza five). Larkin's word choice is exact and devastating: "transfigured" carries religious overtones of transformation into something higher or more radiant, yet the destination is "Untruth." Time has performed a kind of false miracle. Equally important is the cumulative picture of erosion in the opening stanzas — the "sharp tender shock" the observer feels looking at the joined hands is only possible because Time has worn away everything else that might compete for attention. The half-effaced Latin names are not a minor detail; they signal that Time has already claimed the legible, verifiable record, leaving only the ambiguous gesture. Finally, the closing line — "What will survive of us is love" — operates as Time's ultimate product: a statement wrung from centuries of loss that may itself be the untruth Time manufactured.

The cast04–05

04·Relationships

What are Time (Personified Force)'s most important relationships?

With the Earl and Countess: Time treats the two effigies with identical impartiality. It erodes the Earl's heraldic imagery and wears his name toward illegibility; it subjects the Countess to the same attrition, leaving her identity "half-effaced." Yet in erasing the specificity of each figure, Time paradoxically fuses them — what remains most legible is the shared gesture of the clasped hands. The individuals dissolve while the bond, real or constructed, endures.

With the Observer: Every judgment the observer makes is conditioned by what Time has chosen to leave standing. The observer cannot read the full inscription, cannot decode the heraldry, cannot know whether the hand-holding was convention or confession. Time has curated the observer's emotional experience by attrition, making the surviving gesture do far more interpretive work than it was designed for. The observer's "sharp tender shock" is, in a real sense, Time's creation.

With meaning itself: Most profoundly, Time is in relationship with signification. It does not merely destroy objects; it severs signs from their original referents, producing meanings that belong to later centuries rather than to the sculptor or the deceased. This makes Time the poem's most powerful author — the one who determines, through removal, what the tomb ultimately "says."

05·Connected characters

How is Time (Personified Force) connected to the other characters?

The Earl (Stone Effigy)

Time erodes the Earl's effigy—wearing away his Latin name and heraldic detail—while paradoxically preserving his stone hand clasped with the Countess's, transforming a physical remnant into an emblem of endurance.

The Countess (Stone Effigy)

The Countess's figure is equally subject to Time's attrition; her identity is half-effaced, yet the gesture of her hand held by the Earl's survives, making her an unwitting symbol of love that Time has 'transfigured into untruth.'

The Observer / Speaker

Time mediates the Observer's entire encounter with the tomb: centuries of erosion have shaped what the Observer can and cannot read, conditioning the emotional and philosophical conclusions the Observer draws about love and survival.

Study06–07

06·Questions

Questions readers ask about Time (Personified Force)

What does Time do to the Earl and Countess's tomb in "An Arundel Tomb"?

Time acts as an erosive force, gradually stripping away the tomb's identifiable details — wearing the Latin names to near-illegibility and fading the heraldic symbols — while paradoxically leaving the clasped hands of the Earl and Countess as the most legible, emotionally charged feature. This selective erasure means Time, not the sculptor, ultimately determines what the tomb communicates to later generations.

What is the most important line attributed to Time in "An Arundel Tomb"?

"Time has transfigured them into / Untruth" is the poem's sharpest statement about Time's power. Larkin's word "transfigured" carries religious overtones of elevation, yet its destination is "Untruth" — making Time the agent of a false miracle. Rather than simply erasing, Time has actively rewritten the tomb's meaning, turning what may have been a sculptural convention into an apparent testament of love.

Is Time a villain in "An Arundel Tomb"?

Time is not straightforwardly villainous — Larkin presents it as indifferent rather than malicious. It erodes and distorts without intent, which makes it unsettling in a different way than a conscious antagonist. Its destructive work paradoxically amplifies what survives: by wearing away everything else, Time causes the clasped hands to carry far more emotional weight than they were designed to hold.

How does Time shape the Observer's experience of the tomb?

Time mediates the Observer's entire encounter with the tomb by curating — through centuries of attrition — what can and cannot be read. Because the inscriptions are half-effaced and the heraldry has faded, the Observer's eye and emotion are funnelled toward the surviving gesture of the joined hands. The Observer's "sharp tender shock" is therefore, in a real sense, Time's creation rather than the sculptor's or the subjects' intention.

Why does Larkin say Time "transfigures into Untruth" rather than simply destroys?

Larkin's distinction is crucial: Time does not merely delete — it rewrites. By removing the contextual details that would reveal the clasped hands as a probable sculptural convention, Time allows that gesture to accumulate an emotional meaning it was never designed to carry. The result is a new "truth" about love that belongs to later centuries rather than to the Earl, the Countess, or their sculptor.

How does Time treat the Earl and Countess differently from each other?

Time treats both effigies with complete impartiality — it erodes the Earl's heraldic imagery and the Countess's identity in equal measure, leaving both names "half-effaced." Ironically, this identical attrition fuses them: as individual identities dissolve, the shared gesture of their clasped hands becomes the tomb's dominant, surviving feature, making the couple more inseparable in ruin than they may have been in sculptural intention.

What is the paradox of Time's role in "An Arundel Tomb"?

The central paradox is that Time both destroys meaning and creates it. As it erodes inscriptions and symbols, it strips away the verifiable, original record — yet this very diminishment amplifies the emotional power of what remains. The clasped hands survive not despite Time's destruction but because of it, gathering centuries of projected feeling until they produce the poem's ambiguous conclusion: "What will survive of us is love."

Does "An Arundel Tomb" suggest that the love Time preserves is real or an illusion?

Larkin deliberately leaves this unresolved. The line "Time has transfigured them into / Untruth" strongly implies that the love the tomb appears to express is a distortion manufactured by erosion rather than a faithful record of the couple's actual feeling. The closing affirmation — "What will survive of us is love" — is therefore shadowed by irony: it may itself be the untruth Time has engineered, offering consolation that the poem has already quietly undermined.

07·Essay angles

Use this in your essay

Tool · Essay angles

  • The paradox of destructive preservation: Argue that Larkin presents Time as simultaneously the enemy of truth and the creator of meaning, using the transfiguration into "Untruth" as the pivot of this argument.

  • Time as unreliable editor: Explore how the poem interrogates whether any artifact can communicate its original intention across centuries, given that Time selects what survives without regard for accuracy or intent.

  • The manufactured emotion: Build a thesis around the idea that the observer's emotional response to the tomb

    and by extension the reader's — is a product engineered by erosion rather than by the subjects' actual love.

  • "Transfigured into Untruth" as the poem's moral centre: Examine how Larkin's ambivalence about the final line ("What will survive of us is love") is prepared for and undermined by his earlier indictment of Time's distorting power.

  • Time, mortality, and consolation: Consider whether the poem ultimately offers Time's transfiguration as a genuine comfort or as a melancholy illusion, and what that suggests about Larkin's broader attitude toward human attempts to transcend death through art or love.

An Arundel Tomb

Continue

Full study guide →