Skip to content

J. JOHNSON, LL.B. by Homer: Summary, Meaning & Analysis

Homer

This isn't a poem; it's a preface by J.

The poem
CHAPLAIN TO THE BISHOP OF PETERBOROUGH. I have no other pretensions to the honorable name of Editor on this occasion, than as a faithful transcriber of the Manuscript, and a diligent corrector of the Press, which are, doubtless, two of the very humblest employments in that most extensive province. I have wanted the ability to attempt any thing higher; and, fortunately for the reader, I have also wanted the presumption. What, however, I can do, I will. Instead of critical remark, I will furnish him with anecdote. He shall trace from beginning to end the progress of the following work; and in proportion as I have the happiness to engage his attention, I shall merit the name of a fortunate editor. It was in the darkest season of a most calamitous depression of his spirits, that I was summoned to the house of my inestimable friend the Translator, in the month of January, 1794. He had happily completed a revisal of his Homer, and was thinking of the preface to his new edition, when all his satisfaction in the one, and whatever he had projected for the other, in a moment vanished from his mind. He had fallen into a deplorable illness; and though the foremost wish of my heart was to lessen the intenseness of his misery, I was utterly unable to afford him any aid. I had, however, a pleasing though a melancholy opportunity of tracing his recent footsteps in the Field of Troy, and in the Palace of Ithaca. He had materially altered both the Iliad and Odyssey; and, so far as my ability allowed me to judge, they were each of them greatly improved. He had also, at the request of his bookseller, interspersed the two poems with copious notes; for the most part translations of the ancient Scholia, and gleaned, at the cost of many valuable hours, from the pages of Barnes, Clarke, and Villoisson. It has been a constant subject of regret to the admirers of “The Task,” that the exercise of such marvelous original powers, should have been so long suspended by the drudgery of translation; and in this view, their quarrel with the illustrious Greek will be, doubtless, extended to his commentators.[1] During two long years from this most anxious period, the translation continued as it was; and though, in the hope of its being able to divert his melancholy, I had attempted more than once to introduce it to its Author, I was every time painfully obliged to desist. But in the summer of ninety-six, when he had resided with me in Norfolk twelve miserable months, the introduction long wished for took place. To my inexpressible astonishment and joy, I surprised him, one morning, with the Iliad in his hand; and with an excess of delight, which I am still more unable to describe, I the next day discovered that he had been writing.—Were I to mention one of the happiest moments of my life, it might be that which introduced me to the following lines:— Mistaken meanings corrected, admonente G. Wakefield. B. XXIII. L. 429. that the nave Of thy neat wheel seem e’en to grind upon it. L. 865. As when (the north wind freshening) near the bank Up springs a fish in air, then falls again And disappears beneath the sable flood, So at the stroke, he bounded. L. 1018. Thenceforth Tydides o’er his ample shield Aim’d and still aim’d to pierce him in the neck. Or better thus— Tydides, in return, with spear high-poised O’er the broad shield, aim’d ever at his neck, Or best of all— Then Tydeus’ son, with spear high-poised above The ample shield, stood aiming at his neck. He had written these lines with a pencil, on a leaf at the end of his Iliad; and when I reflected on the cause which had given them birth, I could not but admire its disproportion to the effect. What the voice of persuasion had failed in for a year, accident had silently accomplished in a single day. The circumstance I allude to was this: I received a copy of the Iliad and Odyssey of Pope, then recently published by the Editor above mentioned, with illustrative and critical notes of his own. As it commended Mr. Cowper’s Translation in the Preface, and occasionally pointed out its merits in the Notes, I was careful to place it in his way; though it was more from a habit of experiment which I had contracted, than from well-grounded hopes of success. But what a fortunate circumstance was the arrival of this Work! and by what name worthy of its influence shall I call it? In the mouth of an indifferent person it might be Chance; but in mine; whom it rendered so peculiarly happy, common gratitude requires that it should be Providence. As I watched him with an indescribable interest in his progress, I had the satisfaction to find, that, after a few mornings given to promiscuous correction, and to frequent perusal of the above-mentioned Notes, he was evidently settling on the sixteenth Book. This he went regularly through, and the fruits of an application so happily resumed were, one day with another, about sixty new lines. But with the end of the sixteenth Book he had closed the corrections of the year. An excursion to the coast, which immediately followed, though it promised an accession of strength to the body, could not fail to interfere with the pursuits of the mind. It was therefore with much less surprise than regret, that I saw him relinquish the “_Tale of Troy Divine_.” Such was the prelude to the last revisal, which, in the month of January, ninety-seven, Mr. Cowper was persuaded to undertake; and to a faithful copy, as I trust, of which, I have at this time the honor to conduct the reader. But it may not be amiss to observe, that with regard to the earlier books of the Iliad, it was less a revisal of the altered text, than of the text as it stands in the first edition. For though the interleaved copy was always at hand, and in the multitude of its altered places could hardly fail to offer some things worthy to be preserved, but which the ravages of illness and the lapse of time might have utterly effaced from his mind, I could not often persuade the Translator to consult it. I was therefore induced, in the course of transcribing, to compare the two revisals as I went along, and to plead for the continuance of the first correction, when it forcibly struck me as better than the last. This, however, but seldom occurred; and the practice, at length, was completely left off, by his consenting to receive into the number of the books which were daily laid open before him, the interleaved copy to which I allude. At the end of the first six books of the Iliad, the arrival of spring brought the usual interruptions of exercise and air, which increased as the summer advanced to a degree so unfavorable to the progress of Homer, that in the requisite attention to their salutary claims, the revisal was, at one time, altogether at a stand. Only four books were added in the course of nine months; but opportunity returning as the winter set in, there were added, in less than seven weeks, four more: and thus ended the year ninety-seven. As the spring that succeeded was a happier spring, so it led to a happier summer. We had no longer air and exercise alone, but exercise and Homer hand in hand. He even followed us thrice to the sea: and whether our walks were “on the margin of the land, O’er the green summit of the” cliffs, “whose base Beats back the roaring surge,” “or on the shore Of the untillable and barren deep,” they were always within hearing of his magic song. About the middle of this busy summer, the revisal of the Iliad was brought to a close; and on the very next day, the 24th of July, the correction of the Odyssey commenced,—a morning rendered memorable by a kind and unexpected visit from the patroness of that work, the Dowager Lady Spencer! It is not my intention to detain the reader with a progressive account of the Odyssey revised, as circumstantial as that of the Iliad, because it went on smoothly from beginning to end, and was finished in less than eight months. I cannot deliver these volumes to the public without feeling emotions of gratitude toward Heaven, in recollecting how often this corrected Work has appeared to me an instrument of Divine mercy, to mitigate the sufferings of my excellent relation. Its progress in our private hours was singularly medicinal to his mind: may its presentment to the Public prove not less conducive to the honor of the departed Author, who has every claim to my veneration! As a copious life of the Poet is already in the press, from the pen of his intimate friend Mr. Hayley, it is unnecessary for me to enter on such extensive commendation of his character, as my own intimacy with him might suggest; but I hope the reader will kindly allow me the privilege of indulging, in some degree, the feelings of my heart, by applying to him, in the close of this Preface, an expressive verse (borrowed from Homer) which he inscribed himself, with some little variation, on a bust of his Grecian Favorite. Ως τε πατηρ ω παιδι, και ουποτε λησομαι αυτε. Loved as his Son, in him I early found A Father, such as I will ne’er forget. Footnote: Very few signatures had at this time been affixed to the notes; but I afterward compared them with the Greek, note by note, and endeavored to supply the defect; more especially in the last three Volumes, where the reader will be pleased to observe that all the notes without signatures are Mr. Cowper’s, and that those marked B.C.V. are respectively found in the editions of Homer by Barnes, Clarke, and Villoisson. But the employment was so little to the taste and inclination of the poet, that he never afterward revised them, or added to their number more than these which follow;—In the Odyssey, Vol. I. Book xi., the note 32.—Vol.

Public domain · sourced from Project Gutenberg

Quick summary
This isn't a poem; it's a preface by J. Johnson, a clergyman and relative of the poet William Cowper. In it, Johnson shares how he assisted Cowper in getting his revised translation of Homer published during the last years of Cowper's life, which were marked by illness. He reflects on witnessing his friend's gradual return to the work after a long struggle with mental health, and he expresses the quiet joy of seeing Cowper pick up a pencil again. The piece concludes with a heartfelt Greek quote from Homer that Cowper had inscribed on a bust, which Johnson transforms into a touching farewell to the man he cherished like a father.
Themes

Line-by-line

I have no other pretensions to the honorable name of Editor on this occasion...
Johnson begins with a humble approach, presenting himself simply as a copyist and proofreader. This move prepares him for any potential criticism regarding his editorial background, while also indicating that the story he aims to share is more personal than academic.
It was in the darkest season of a most calamitous depression of his spirits...
Johnson sets the scene: January 1794, Cowper is struggling with severe mental illness. The word 'summoned' is significant—this was a call for help, not just a friendly visit. Johnson had just seen Cowper finish a revision of Homer, only for all satisfaction in it to crumble under the burden of his illness.
I had, however, a pleasing though a melancholy opportunity of tracing his recent footsteps in the Field of Troy...
Johnson mentions going through Cowper's revised manuscripts of the *Iliad* and *Odyssey* and finding them genuinely better. He also expresses some frustration that Cowper's fans were upset about how much of his creative energy went into translation instead of original works like *The Task*.
During two long years from this most anxious period, the translation continued as it was...
Two years of halted efforts and unsuccessful attempts to get Cowper interested in his own manuscript. Then, in the summer of 1796, Johnson finds Cowper reading the Iliad by himself — and the following day learns that he has started writing again. Johnson carefully notes the precise penciled corrections Cowper made, treating them like treasured artifacts.
He had written these lines with a pencil, on a leaf at the end of his Iliad...
Johnson is amazed by the strange twist of fate: a copy of Pope's Homer, simply left in Cowper's way, achieved what two years of gentle encouragement could not. He refers to this as Providence — a term he uses intentionally instead of 'chance', because the significance of the moment was too great for him to attribute to mere accident.
As I watched him with an indescribable interest in his progress...
Cowper gets into Book XVI of the Iliad, writing about sixty new lines each day. However, his progress halts once more when a trip to the coast disrupts his routine. Johnson observes this with "much less surprise than regret" — he recognizes that Cowper's connection with Homer is delicate and tends to come and go.
Such was the prelude to the last revisal, which, in the month of January, ninety-seven...
Johnson describes the editorial challenges he encountered: Cowper frequently neglected to refer to his previous interleaved corrections, leading Johnson to discreetly compare both versions during transcription. At times, he advocated for keeping the original revision when it was evidently superior. This offers a subtle yet insightful glimpse into the dedication of an editor navigating the complexities of a brilliant but ailing intellect.
At the end of the first six books of the Iliad, the arrival of spring brought the usual interruptions...
Progress unfolds in cycles. Spring and summer draw Cowper outside, while winter sends him back to his desk. Johnson monitors the numbers — four books in nine months, followed by another four in just seven weeks — with the steady patience of someone tallying good days for a loved one.
As the spring that succeeded was a happier spring, so it led to a happier summer...
A genuine turning point: Homer and daily walks turn into companions instead of rivals. The revision of the Iliad wraps up, and the Odyssey starts the very next day. Johnson highlights the date — 24 July — and mentions a visit from Lady Spencer, the work's patron, as if noting a small ceremony.
I cannot deliver these volumes to the public without feeling emotions of gratitude toward Heaven...
Johnson closes with heartfelt emotion. He presents the entire project as an act of divine mercy—the work kept Cowper alive and engaged during his darkest times. He hands Cowper's biography over to William Hayley, then concludes with a Greek line from Homer that Cowper had inscribed on a bust, translating it as a personal farewell: *Loved as his Son, in him I early found / A Father, such as I will ne'er forget.*

Tone & mood

Quiet, devoted, and tinged with grief. Johnson writes with the measured restraint of someone who has spent years witnessing a loved one's suffering, now attempting to translate that experience into dignified prose. There are moments of genuine joy—like discovering Cowper writing again and Homer following them to the sea—but they are consistently overshadowed by past and future events. The prevailing sentiment is that of a long, lovingly maintained vigil.

Symbols & metaphors

  • The pencilled corrections on the final leafCowper's handwritten revisions, discovered by Johnson tucked away in the back of the Iliad, serve as a sign of life—proof that illness hadn't completely erased his mind. Johnson regards them with a sense of reverence, transcribing every word.
  • Homer / 'the magic song'Homer's text isn't merely a translation project; it acts as a therapeutic companion, accompanying Cowper and Johnson on their coastal walks and providing structure to their otherwise shapeless, difficult days. It represents the healing power of art and meaningful work.
  • The seasons (spring, summer, winter)The rhythm of the seasons shapes the whole narrative of the revision. Spring and summer introduce interruptions and outdoor activities, while winter fosters focus and productivity. The seasons serve as a mental health calendar, reflecting Cowper's varying ability to connect with the world.
  • The bust of Homer with the Greek inscriptionThe bust, inscribed by Cowper with a line from Homer about a father and son, becomes the emotional focal point of the preface's conclusion. It bridges the gap between Cowper as the translator and Homer as the original author, enabling Johnson to use Homer's words as his heartfelt tribute to Cowper.
  • Providence vs. ChanceJohnson's careful use of the word 'Providence' instead of 'chance' to describe Pope's Homer arriving is a subtle yet meaningful choice. It reflects his view that Cowper's creative revival wasn't just a matter of luck but was divinely guided — an assertion that carries both emotional and theological weight.

Historical context

William Cowper (1731–1800) was a highly regarded English poet during the late eighteenth century, best known for his work *The Task* (1785). He battled severe depression and religious despair throughout his adult life, with his later years marked by significant mental decline. His blank-verse translation of Homer, first published in 1791, was an enormous project that occupied him for many years. J. Johnson — whom Cowper affectionately referred to as 'Johnny of Norfolk' — was a distant cousin and clergyman who took on the role of Cowper's primary caregiver in his final years, relocating him to East Dereham in Norfolk. This preface, written for the revised 1802 edition of the translation (which was published posthumously after Cowper's death in 1800), serves as Johnson's account of how that final revision came to be. It's as much a personal reflection on caregiving as it is an introduction to the editorial work.

FAQ

It is prose, not verse. The attribution to 'Homer' in the metadata is misleading—this is a preface by J. Johnson for William Cowper's revised translation of Homer. The text presents Johnson's own editorial introduction, not a poem by Homer or anyone else.

Similar poems