Character analysis
John Brown
in The Empress by Tanika Gupta
John Brown is Queen Victoria's loyal Scottish Highland servant and closest companion, holding a uniquely intimate and emotionally charged role in the royal household. Gruff, straightforward, and fiercely loyal, Brown navigates the rigid hierarchies of court life with ease, addressing Victoria directly—much to the shock of courtiers—while clearly providing comfort to the grieving queen. He acts as her protector and emotional anchor: managing her physical well-being, speaking difficult truths, and refusing to indulge in the deference that keeps her isolated from real human connection.
Brown's story highlights the tension between his deep intimacy with Victoria and the resentment that arises from it among the court and royal family. He is unapologetically working-class and Scottish, characteristics that attract aristocratic disdain and political suspicion, yet these same traits are what Victoria cherishes. Their relationship is depicted as deeply affectionate, but the nature of that love—whether romantic, paternal, or simply a bond between two lonely individuals—remains intentionally unclear.
As the narrative brings new figures into Victoria's life, Brown's position becomes increasingly complicated and ultimately at risk. He represents an older, more private side of Victoria's emotional landscape, anchored in Balmoral and her personal grief for Prince Albert. His resistance to change and protectiveness can sometimes border on possessiveness, revealing a man who fears losing the unique significance he has in the queen's life. His death or departure serves as a pivotal moment, leaving Victoria exposed to new influences and highlighting how much of her strength had been quietly supported by him.
Who they are
John Brown enters The Empress as a figure whose power derives from personal intimacy rather than rank. He is Queen Victoria's Highland servant: Scottish, working-class, blunt by court standards, and indifferent to the protocol that governs the royal household. Where courtiers bow, hedge, and flatter, Brown speaks plainly, addresses Victoria without elaborate deference, and physically tends to her — steadying her on horseback, managing her daily welfare — in ways that no aristocrat would dare. Gupta establishes him as someone who has carved out a singular position through loyal presence, and the court's discomfort with him is immediate and class-inflected. His Scottishness and roughness are precisely the qualities that make him both indispensable to Victoria and intolerable to those who believe proximity to the monarch should be the exclusive province of the well-born.
Arc & motivation
Brown's arc involves slow displacement. He enters the play already occupying the central emotional role in Victoria's life — a role he stepped into after Prince Albert's death left the queen adrift — and his dramatic function is to inhabit that role with complete conviction while the world around him begins to shift. His core motivation is to keep Victoria anchored: to her grief, her private self, her retreat at Balmoral, and by extension to him. This is partly self-serving, but Brown genuinely believes that the version of Victoria he knows and protects is the truest one. He sees the court and the empire as threats that may abstract her into a symbol at the expense of the person. His resistance to change — including Abdul Karim's growing influence — shows a man who conflates Victoria's well-being with his own indispensability. As Karim rises, Brown's arc bends toward irrelevance, and his departure or death exposes how much of Victoria's daily resilience had been quietly underwritten by him.
Key moments
Brown's most revealing moments occur when he addresses Victoria with unfiltered directness that visibly shocks the court. These scenes illustrate their relationship: not the formal service relationship everyone else performs, but something closer to honest companionship. His management of Victoria's physical safety — holding her horse, guiding her movements — carries emotional weight because it represents a tenderness that the court's elaborate ritual cannot accommodate. His protectiveness becomes possessiveness most clearly in relation to the Munshi; the scenes that position Brown and Karim in implicit competition reveal a man who understands, at some level, that a pattern is repeating and that this time he may be on the losing side. His death or exit is structurally pivotal: it strips Victoria of her oldest emotional defense just as new, more politically charged relationships demand her attention.
Relationships in depth
Brown's relationship with Victoria is the gravitational center of his characterization. It is rendered ambiguous — romantic, paternal, and mutually dependent all at once — and Gupta wisely refrains from resolving it. Brown fills the specific void Albert left: not as a husband replacement, but as the person who makes ordinary life manageable for a woman who could otherwise disappear entirely into ceremonial isolation. His relationship with the memory of Albert, therefore, is structural; his loyalty to Victoria continues Albert's household service, and Victoria's attachment to Brown is inseparable from her grief.
The implicit rivalry with Abdul Karim drives Brown's later dramatic tension. The court's language around the Munshi — suspicion of improper influence, anxiety about a social inferior wielding power over the monarch — mirrors the language once directed at Brown, a parallel Gupta uses to critique the establishment's selective outrage. Brown's antagonism with figures like Lord Salisbury crystallizes the class warfare his presence evokes: Salisbury's contempt is institutional, and Brown's refusal to be diminished by it is one of his most quietly defiant qualities. Thematically, Brown also parallels Sarah Forbes Bonetta — both are outsiders drawn into Victoria's intimate orbit and never fully absorbed into the world they navigate.
Connected characters
- Queen Victoria
Brown's central relationship: he serves as Victoria's personal attendant, emotional confidant, and arguably her most intimate companion after Albert's death. He addresses her with unfiltered honesty, holds her horse, steadies her physically and emotionally, and occupies a closeness that no courtier or family member is permitted. Their bond is the emotional core of his role in the narrative.
- Prince Albert
Albert's death is the shadow that defines Brown's importance. Brown steps into the void left by Albert, becoming the person who keeps Victoria tethered to daily life. His loyalty is partly framed as a continuation of service to Albert's memory, and Victoria's attachment to Brown is inseparable from her unresolved grief.
- Abdul Karim
Abdul Karim (the Munshi) represents Brown's successor in Victoria's affections, and the two exist in implicit rivalry. Brown's possessiveness of Victoria is contrasted with the new intimacy she develops with Karim, suggesting that Brown's model of devotion will be displaced by a younger, more politically charged favourite.
- The Munshi
As the Munshi, Karim occupies the role Brown once held exclusively—trusted personal attendant elevated far above his station. Brown's legacy haunts the court's reaction to the Munshi, with critics using the same language of improper influence that was once directed at Brown himself.
- Lord Salisbury
Salisbury represents the establishment hostility Brown faces: aristocratic, politically calculating, and contemptuous of a Highland servant wielding such influence over the monarch. Their dynamic encapsulates the class and institutional tensions Brown's presence provokes.
- Rani of Jhansi
Both Brown and the Rani of Jhansi exist as figures of fierce, uncompromising loyalty and resistance to imperial power structures, though from radically different positions. Their thematic pairing highlights the narrative's interest in those who refuse to be diminished by empire.
- Sarah Forbes Bonetta
Sarah, like Brown, is an outsider absorbed into Victoria's intimate circle yet never fully belonging to the world of the court. Both characters reflect the queen's tendency to form bonds across social boundaries, and both expose the limits of royal protection.
Use this in your essay
Class, intimacy, and power
How does Brown's working-class identity make him Victoria's most honest companion and the court's most resented presence? What does Gupta suggest about who is permitted emotional proximity to power?
Grief and substitution
To what extent is Brown's role in Victoria's life a displacement of her mourning for Albert, and how does the play complicate the ethics of that substitution?
The pattern of the favourite
Compare Brown and Abdul Karim as royal favourites. What does the court's identical hostility to both figures reveal about institutional power and the limits of royal protection?
Possessiveness as devotion
Argue for or against the view that Brown's protectiveness ultimately serves his own need for significance more than Victoria's genuine welfare.
Empire's blind spots
Brown is Scottish, working-class, and resistant to imperial grandeur. How does his marginal position within the British establishment allow Gupta to critique empire from an unexpected interior vantage point?