Character analysis
Jerry Crowe
in How Many Miles to Babylon? by Jennifer Johnston
Jerry Crowe is a working-class Irish soldier and the emotional core of Jennifer Johnston's How Many Miles to Babylon? (1974). Stationed on the Western Front during World War One, he narrates his own story in a way that's framed by Alec's perspective, but Jerry's presence is what drives every moral conflict in the narrative. Growing up in poverty on the Moore estate, Jerry is a skilled horseman with quiet dignity who forms an unlikely yet sincere friendship with the Anglo-Irish Alec Moore during their childhood. This cross-class bond is both the novel's central relationship and a significant transgression.
Jerry enlists not out of a sense of patriotism but to search for his father, who has gone missing at the front — a motivation born from loyalty to family rather than ideology. In the trenches, he is practical, brave, and sardonic, using dry wit to cut through the absurdity of military hierarchy. When he goes absent without leave to find his father's body, he faces a court-martial and a death sentence. His story culminates in execution, carried out by Alec himself — a heartbreaking act that frames the entire novel and critiques the class system, imperial war, and the institutions that strip away individual humanity.
Jerry embodies loyalty, self-control, and a clear-eyed view of his social position. He neither idealizes his friendship with Alec nor resents its boundaries; he simply embraces it fully, making his death an even sharper indictment of the world that ultimately destroys him.
Who they are
Jerry Crowe is a working-class Irish stable hand's son who grows up on the Moore estate in County Wicklow. He occupies the space between servant and friend with a self-possession that avoids self-pity. Johnston introduces him through Alec's retrospective narration, yet Jerry's voice and moral clarity often feel more present than the narrator himself. A gifted horseman, his skill first attracts Alec in childhood and later becomes the singular space in the novel where class temporarily dissolves. In the trenches of the Western Front, Jerry exhibits practicality and sardonicism, using dry wit as armor against military absurdity and the indignities of rank. He clearly understands his position in the social hierarchy, has never been deceived by it, and refuses to become embittered. This lucidity combined with loyalty makes him one of the most morally coherent figures in Johnston's fiction and one of its most devastating losses.
Arc & motivation
Jerry's journey is driven by loyalty instead of ideology. He does not enlist out of patriotism or romantic notions of heroism; he enlists to find his father, who has gone missing at the front. This deeply personal motivation cannot be accommodated or even recognized by the military machine. His arc transitions from the relative freedom of his estate childhood, where he and Alec forge a friendship across the class divide, through the harsh realities of the trenches, to the court-martial that seals his fate. When he goes absent without leave to locate his father's body, he commits the act that leads to his death — yet Johnston frames it as the only action consistent with everything Jerry has ever valued. His death is not a fall from grace; it is the inevitable result of a world that was always going to destroy someone like him.
Key moments
The childhood scenes on the Moore estate set the terms of Jerry and Alec's friendship and immediately demonstrate Jerry's capacity for equality on his own terms — he neither exhibits deference nor overclaims intimacy. His enlistment conversation is pivotal: when he reveals his true reason for joining, it removes any martial sentiment that the reader might have imposed and grounds his story firmly in personal love rather than an imperial cause. In the trenches, his sardonic commentary on the officers' rituals and Glendinning's bureaucratic authority signals his clear perception of the institution. His AWOL act — searching for his father — serves as the moral hinge of the novella, an entirely human gesture met with a death sentence. The execution scene, where Alec carries out the order to shoot him, represents the novel's tragic culmination: Jerry faces it with the quiet self-possession he has shown throughout, rendering his death an accusation without words.
Relationships in depth
With Alec Moore, Jerry forms the novel's emotional core. Their friendship is genuine and mutual, founded on a shared love of horses and maintained through class pressures that should have extinguished it. Jerry neither idealizes the relationship nor tests it with resentment; he simply inhabits it fully, which makes Alec's final act so shattering. Jerry trusts Alec completely, and Alec's execution of him — legally compelled, emotionally catastrophic — symbolizes not a betrayal by Alec but the ultimate proof of the social order's power over both of them.
With Major Glendinning and Captain Barry, Jerry encounters the military hierarchy serving as a reflection of the class system he has navigated since birth. Glendinning processes his court-martial with complete indifference to the human circumstances — the missing father, the personal grief — that motivated Jerry's AWOL. This response is familiar for Jerry, as institutions have always viewed him as a category before recognizing him as a person.
With Alec's mother, Jerry represents a social threat to be neutralized. Her efforts to disrupt the boys' friendship highlight the novel's central argument: that the world these characters inhabit perceives cross-class intimacy as disorder to be corrected rather than humanity to be celebrated.
Connected characters
- Alec Moore
Jerry and Alec share the novel's defining relationship — a cross-class friendship forged in childhood on the Moore estate through their mutual love of horses. In the trenches, Jerry is the one person Alec trusts completely, and their bond is the only authentic human connection either man sustains. The friendship's tragic apex comes when Alec, ordered to do so, shoots Jerry at his execution, an act that destroys Alec morally and condemns the social order that made their equality impossible in life.
- Major Glendinning
Glendinning represents the military-institutional authority that sentences Jerry to death after his AWOL. He is indifferent to Jerry's humanity and to the personal circumstances (searching for his father) that motivated the offence, embodying the class-bound callousness Jerry has navigated his entire life.
- Alec's Mother
Alec's mother views Jerry as a dangerous social contaminant and actively works to sever his friendship with Alec. Her hostility underscores the rigid class barriers Jerry inhabits, and her influence over Alec foreshadows the way social forces will ultimately destroy Jerry.
- Alec's Father
Alec's father is more ambivalent toward Jerry than his wife, but he too upholds the estate hierarchy that defines Jerry as a servant's son rather than an equal. His passive complicity in class divisions contributes to the conditions that make Jerry's fate inevitable.
- Bennett
Bennett is Jerry's fellow soldier and a figure of the brutal, dehumanising trench environment. His interactions with Jerry highlight the grinding anonymity of working-class soldiers' lives and contrast with the particular, named friendship Jerry shares with Alec.
- Captain Barry
Captain Barry is part of the military command structure that processes Jerry's court-martial. Like Glendinning, he functions as an instrument of institutional power, reinforcing the theme that the army's hierarchy mirrors and enforces the same class prejudices Jerry has faced since birth.
Use this in your essay
Class and institutional power
Argue that Jerry's execution is not primarily a military event but the final enforcement of a class system that has constrained him since childhood — with Glendinning and Alec's mother acting as parallel agents of the same prejudice.
Loyalty as subversion
Examine how Jerry's motivations — friendship, filial duty — consistently lean toward the personal and relational rather than the ideological, considering what Johnston implies about the loyalty the state will and will not permit.
Lucidity versus self-deception
Compare Jerry's clear-eyed understanding of his social position with Alec's persistent idealism; explore how Johnston distributes moral intelligence across the class divide.
The cross-class friendship as critique
Use Jerry and Alec's relationship to question whether Johnston presents genuine equality as possible within the novel's social structures, or only as a fleeting, ultimately doomed transgression.
Narrative framing and voice
Explore the implications of Jerry's story being mediated through Alec's narration — what is lost, gained, or complicated when a working-class character's life is filtered through an Anglo-Irish perspective, even a sympathetic one?