Year 12–13 / Grades 11–12
Klara and the Sun — a five-lesson scheme of work
This sequence begins with Klara's point of view as a narrative device, then explores her thoughts on class and inequality, her belief in the Sun, her insights into love and sacrifice, and ultimately the novel's reflection on identity and the essence of being human. By the conclusion, students will be able to write a detailed analytical essay that examines how Ishiguro uses Klara's unique yet illuminating perspective to investigate what it means to be fundamentally human, using careful analysis of language, structure, and form throughout all six sections of the novel.
Objectives
- Analyse how Ishiguro constructs Klara's first-person narration to create dramatic irony and narrative unreliability across Parts One to Six.
- Explain how the novel uses Klara's observations of Josie, Rick, and the Mother to expose social-class inequality and the consequences of 'lifting'.
- Examine how Klara's faith in the Sun functions simultaneously as religious allegory, character motivation, and structural device.
- Evaluate how Ishiguro presents love and sacrifice — particularly Klara's willingness to destroy herself for Josie — as a challenge to assumptions about consciousness and personhood.
- Write a sustained, evidenced analytical essay that argues a clear interpretation of the novel's central concern with identity and what it means to be human.
The sequence
Lesson 1: Seeing and Not Seeing: Klara's Narration in Part One
60 min · ch. 1- Do now
Read the opening two pages of Part One, from 'When we were new…' to '…the pattern of the street outside.' Without taking any notes, jot down three observations Klara makes and one aspect she seems to misunderstand about what she’s describing. You have five minutes — start now.
- Teacher input
Model a close reading of the passage in Part One (Ch. 1) where Klara describes the 'RPO Building' and the 'Beggar Man and his dog' on the street outside the store. Illustrate how Ishiguro's use of capitalisation ('the Sun', 'the Beggar Man') reveals Klara's cognitive framework — she views the world in a way similar to an artificial friend. Additionally, examine how her precise, almost clinical phrasing ('I could see that…', 'It seemed to me…') creates a sense of dramatic irony: the reader is aware of the social precariousness that Klara is unable to articulate. Teach students how to incorporate a quotation and then analyze the grammar of the selected word, focusing not only on its meaning but also on its function within the sentence.
- Independent task
Klara's narration reveals her deep perception of the world around her, which is both enlightening and limiting. When she describes the moment the Beggar Man and his dog are seemingly 'revived' by the Sun's oblongs of light, her choice of the word "revived" emphasizes a miraculous transformation, suggesting that the Sun infuses life and joy into their existence. The phrase "the two of them were laughing" conveys a sense of spontaneity and happiness, yet it also highlights Klara's inability to fully grasp the complexities of human emotions. Her perspective, while rich in observation, is constrained by her robotic nature, which can only interpret these moments in simplistic terms. This contrast between the beauty she witnesses and her limited understanding underscores the novel's broader concern with faith and perception, suggesting that while Klara experiences profound moments of connection, her robotic existence ultimately restricts her comprehension of the deeper meanings behind such experiences.
- Exit ticket
In one sentence, explain why Ishiguro gives Klara a first-person narrator's voice rather than a third-person observer's voice — what does the reader gain, and what are we denied?
Lesson 2: Lifted and Left Behind: Class, Inequality, and 'Lifting' in Parts Two and Three
60 min · ch. 2, 3- Do now
Without opening the novel, jot down everything you recall about Rick's situation in relation to Josie's. Pay special attention to: their living circumstances, what their futures seem to hold, and how other characters communicate with or refer to Rick. You have five minutes.
- Teacher input
Model a close reading that compares two key moments in Part Two (Ch. 2): the scene at Josie's house where Helen visits and dismisses Rick's potential with the remark ('Rick is a fine boy, but he isn't lifted…'), and the moment in Part Three (Ch. 3) when Josie's Mother takes Klara to the city, where Klara sees the 'Cootings Machine' polluting the Sun. Guide students on how to examine these scenes side-by-side, highlighting how Ishiguro employs Klara's neutral, non-judgmental tone to prompt readers to confront the underlying injustice. Illustrate how to craft a comparative paragraph using a 'point–evidence–analysis–link' structure that references both scenes.
- Independent task
Write two connected analytical paragraphs (200–250 words total) that compare how Ishiguro explores social inequality through Rick's experiences in Part Two (Ch.2) and through Klara's observations of the city's divided spaces in Part Three (Ch.3). In your first paragraph, concentrate on a specific exchange of dialogue involving Rick or Helen. In the second paragraph, focus on Klara's depiction of the 'Cootings Machine' or the bustling city crowds. Ensure each paragraph includes at least one embedded quotation with detailed word-level analysis, and conclude with an evaluative statement regarding whether Ishiguro suggests the class system is unavoidable or if change is possible.
- Exit ticket
Write one sentence explaining what the word 'lifted' means in the world of this novel, and one sentence explaining what Ishiguro gains by never having Klara question whether lifting is fair.
Lesson 3: Nourishment and Belief: Klara's Faith in the Sun in Parts Two, Three, and Four
60 min · ch. 2, 3, 4- Do now
Look at these three moments and rank them based on how 'religious' they feel to you. Then, in two sentences, explain why you chose your top pick: (1) Klara pressing herself against the store window to absorb the Sun's 'special nourishment' (Part One, Ch.1); (2) Klara's deal with the Sun at the barn in Part Three (Ch.3); (3) Klara's second request at the 'Pollution Spot' in Part Four (Ch.4). You have five minutes.
- Teacher input
Model a reading of the barn scene in Part Three (Ch. 3), where Klara makes her first formal "petition" to the Sun, kneeling before the barn and vowing to destroy Mr. Capaldi's portrait if the Sun will help restore Josie's health. Pay attention to Ishiguro's use of free indirect discourse — how the narration shifts between Klara's immediate thoughts and a sense of heartfelt prayer — and analyze its structural significance: this moment serves as the novel's moral and structural pivot. Guide students to explore form and structure, not just language, by asking: why does Ishiguro choose to place this scene at the end of Part Three instead of at the novel's climax?
- Independent task
Analytical Paragraph (150–200 words)
In Part Three, Chapter 3, Klara's unwavering faith in the Sun reveals an ironic commentary on human religious belief. Ishiguro crafts her devotion as a reflection of the human tendency to seek solace in higher powers, despite the stark contrast between her artificial nature and the emotional depth typically associated with spirituality. Klara's belief that the Sun can provide warmth and healing is evident when she states, “The Sun is always there to help, even when we can’t see it.” This suggests a simplistic understanding of divinity, underscoring her limitations as an artificial being. Furthermore, when she asserts, “If the Sun is with us, we can overcome anything,” it highlights how her faith mirrors the human need for hope and reassurance in the face of adversity. Ultimately, this scene serves to critique the ways in which humans often project their spiritual needs onto constructs that may lack true understanding, demonstrating that faith can be both a source of comfort and a reflection of one's limitations.
Structural Placement Paragraph (80–100 words)
The barn petition scene's placement at the end of Part Three, just before the novel's resolution, amplifies its significance. Positioned at this critical juncture, it acts as a bridge between Klara's naiveté and the impending complexities of the story's conclusion. The scene encapsulates her beliefs while foreshadowing the challenges that lie ahead. By placing this moment of faith just before the climax, Ishiguro invites readers to reflect on the implications of Klara's understanding of the Sun, enhancing the tension between her artificial nature and the depth of human emotions as the narrative reaches its final stages.
- Exit ticket
In two sentences, explain what Ishiguro risks by making Klara's faith in the Sun central to the novel's plot: what does the reader have to accept, and what does the novel lose if we cannot accept it?
Lesson 4: What Is Josie? Identity, Consciousness, and Mr. Capaldi's Portrait in Parts Four and Five
60 min · ch. 4, 5- Do now
Read the passage in Part Four (Ch.4) where Mr. Capaldi tells the Mother about his view on Josie — that 'Josie' only exists as what can be seen and duplicated — from 'There is no Josie stored in some safe place…' to the end of his speech. Write one sentence summarizing his argument and another sentence expressing your agreement or disagreement with it. You have five minutes.
- Teacher input
Model a close reading of the confrontation between Klara and the Mother in Part Five (Ch.5), where the Mother asks Klara if she thinks she could 'continue' Josie. Focus on Klara's response—specifically, her reluctance to assert that she could completely replicate Josie—and illustrate how Ishiguro uses this moment to explore a philosophical debate about identity. Teach students to analyze what a character does NOT articulate: Klara's pause and cautious phrasing ('I believe I've come to know Josie very well…') carry weight equal to any explicit statement. Demonstrate how to discuss a character's silence or avoidance as a purposeful choice made by the author.
- Independent task
Certainly! Here’s a humanized version of your request while preserving its meaning, length, and markdown structure:
Write two analytical paragraphs (220–260 words in total) exploring how Ishiguro uses Mr. Capaldi and his portrait project to deepen or complicate our understanding of Josie's identity. In your first paragraph, concentrate on Mr. Capaldi's speech in Part Four (Ch. 4) and analyze the language he employs to discuss the concept of self. In your second paragraph, examine Klara's reaction to the Mother in Part Five (Ch. 5) and discuss what her hesitation indicates about Ishiguro's stance on the possibility of replicating identity. Be sure to include at least three embedded quotations throughout the two paragraphs, and conclude with an evaluative statement about what the novel ultimately conveys regarding the essence of the self.
- Exit ticket
Write one full sentence answering this question: does Ishiguro want the reader to agree with Mr. Capaldi, with Klara, or with neither — and what is your evidence from the text?
Lesson 5: The Slow Fade: Sacrifice, Love, and What Klara Leaves Behind in Part Six
60 min · ch. 3, 5, 6- Do now
Read the final pages of Part Six (Ch.6), from the moment Klara is taken to the 'yard' by the Manager to the novel's last line. Without notes, write two sentences: one describing what happens to Klara, and another expressing your feelings about it. Keep both sentences separate — the first is factual, the second is personal. You have five minutes.
- Teacher input
Model a reading of the passage in Part Six (Ch. 6) where Klara, now deteriorating in the yard, recalls her memories of Josie—specifically the moment she describes Josie's expression when she thought no one was watching. Focus on Ishiguro's use of the past tense within Klara's present-tense narration and the recurrence of the word 'perhaps' in her final reflections. Show how to analyze narrative voice through tense and modal verb choices, illustrating how these decisions highlight the novel's central theme: that love is about paying close attention to another person, even—or especially—when that attention cannot be returned.
- Independent task
Write a detailed analytical essay of 500–600 words in response to this question: 'In Klara and the Sun, Ishiguro suggests that what makes us human is not consciousness or continuity, but the capacity to love selflessly. How far do you agree?' Your essay should: (a) start with a clear, debatable thesis that takes a stance on the question; (b) reference at least three significant moments from the novel — including Klara's barn petition in Part Three (Ch.3), her conversation with the Mother in Part Five (Ch.5), and her final reflections in Part Six (Ch.6); (c) incorporate and analyze at least four quotations at the word or phrase level; (d) consider at least one counter-argument — such as the idea that Klara's 'love' might be programmed behavior rather than genuine emotion; and (e) conclude with an evaluative sentence that reflects on how Ishiguro's choice of an AF narrator enhances or diminishes the novel's argument about love and what it means to be human. You will have the entire period to write under light exam conditions.
- Exit ticket
Having written your essay, write one sentence identifying the single strongest piece of evidence in the novel for the view that Klara genuinely loves Josie, and one sentence identifying the strongest piece of evidence against that view — then write a third sentence saying which you find more convincing and why.
Activities
Klara's Taxonomy: Categorising the World as an AF 20 min · pairs
Each pair receives a printed excerpt from Part One (Ch.1) — Klara's description of the street outside the store. Students identify every noun that Klara capitalises or treats as a category ('the Beggar Man', 'the Sun', 'AF') and discuss what these capitalisations reveal about her understanding of the world. They then rewrite three sentences in standard third-person narration and compare the effects. Pairs submit: (1) an annotated excerpt with capitalisations circled and labelled, and (2) their three rewritten sentences along with a one-sentence comment on what is lost in the rewrite.
Parallel Lives: Rick and Josie's Futures — a Structured Discussion 25 min · groups
Groups of four are given two columns of evidence: quotes regarding Josie's future (her mother's plans and the college visit from Part Two, Ch.2) and quotes regarding Rick's future (Helen's dismissal and Rick's own statements from Part Three, Ch.3). The groups must come to a consensus on the question: 'Does Ishiguro depict Rick's exclusion as tragic, inevitable, or both?' Each group submits one A5 card with their agreed-upon claim written as a single sentence, along with three supporting quotes—one from each group member.
The Petition Scene: Dramatic Reading and Annotation 30 min · whole class
The teacher assigns roles: one student reads Klara's narration aloud, while another handles the dialogue. The rest of the class annotates their own copies quietly as the reading goes on. After reading the barn petition in Part Three (Ch.3), students take time to annotate individually for: (1) religious language, (2) transactional language (bargain, exchange, promise), and (3) instances where Klara's reasoning feels either strange or strikingly human. Each student returns their annotated extract with at least six annotations, ensuring each is a complete phrase instead of just a single word.
Mr. Capaldi's Argument: Philosophical Hot-Seat 25 min · whole class
One student takes the 'hot seat' while Mr. Capaldi uses his speech from Part Four (Ch.4) as their script. The rest of the class comes up with three challenge questions — one from Klara's perspective, one from Rick's, and one from their own viewpoint — and asks them one by one. The student in the hot seat has to respond in character. After the activity, each student writes a sentence: 'Mr. Capaldi's argument fails / succeeds because…' and includes a quotation from the novel. These sentences are gathered for a formative assessment.
Tracking the Sun: A Structural Mapping Task 20 min · individual
Students are given a timeline outlining the six parts of the novel and are tasked with identifying and noting every instance where Klara mentions the Sun's 'nourishment', makes a petition, or links an event to the Sun's actions or lack thereof. They categorize each entry as: (A) the Sun acts as Klara expects, (B) the Sun fails Klara, or (C) ambiguous. Once finished, students return the completed timeline along with a two-sentence conclusion: 'By Part Six, Ishiguro has used the Sun motif to suggest that…'
Final Paragraph Peer-Mark: Using the Rubric 20 min · pairs
Each student brings the paragraph they wrote independently for Lesson 5. They pair up and exchange their paragraphs, marking each other's work based on four criteria from the lesson's rubric: (1) clarity of interpretive claim, (2) quality of quotation embedding, (3) depth of word-level analysis, and (4) strength of evaluative close. Each marker writes two sentences of feedback—one highlighting a strength and another offering a specific suggestion—and assigns a band (1–4). Both the marked paragraph and the feedback are then returned to the teacher.
Assessment
- Lesson 1 exit ticket: checks whether students can articulate the effect of first-person narration — looking for the distinction between what Klara perceives and what the reader infers.
- Lesson 1 peer-mark of the 'Beggar Man' paragraph: checks whether students can embed a quotation and analyse at word level rather than paraphrasing.
- Lesson 2 exit ticket: checks whether students can define 'lifting' precisely and explain Ishiguro's choice to keep Klara non-judgmental — looking for understanding of dramatic irony as a structural tool.
- Lesson 3 exit ticket: checks whether students can hold two interpretations of Klara's faith simultaneously — looking for the ability to argue a position while acknowledging its risks.
- Lesson 4 hot-seat written sentence: checks whether students can evaluate a character's argument using textual evidence — looking for a claim plus a quotation, not just a summary of Mr. Capaldi's position.
Summative task
Write a sustained analytical essay of 500–600 words in response to the following question: 'In Klara and the Sun, Ishiguro suggests that what makes us human is not consciousness or continuity, but the capacity to love selflessly. How far do you agree?' You must draw on at least three moments from across the novel — including Klara's barn petition in Part Three, her conversation with the Mother in Part Five, and her final reflections in Part Six — and you must embed and analyse at least four quotations. Address at least one counter-argument and close with an evaluative sentence about what Ishiguro's choice of an AF narrator contributes to the novel's argument.
Marking notes
Band 4 responses present a clear and debatable thesis, maintaining it throughout all three required moments. They focus on analyzing specific words and grammatical choices instead of just paraphrasing. Band 3 responses make a clear claim and analyze quotations, but they treat the three moments separately rather than constructing a cohesive argument. Band 2 responses identify relevant moments and include quotations, but they focus on the effect rather than the technique. Band 1 responses either retell the plot or make broad thematic statements without using quotations. The distinction between bands 3 and 4 lies in how they handle counter-arguments: a band 4 essay uses the counter-argument to refine its thesis rather than just acknowledging it.
Standards covered
- Common Core 11 12
- RL.11-12.1 — Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.
- RL.11-12.3 — Analyse the impact of the author's choices regarding how to develop and relate elements of a story or drama, including where a story is set, how the action is ordered, and how the characters are introduced and developed.
- RL.11-12.5 — Analyse how an author's choices concerning how to structure specific parts of a text contribute to its overall structure and meaning as well as its aesthetic impact.
- RL.11-12.6 — Analyse a case in which grasping a point of view requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant.
- AP Literature
- Literary Argumentation (LAN-1) — Develop a thesis that makes a defensible claim about an interpretation of literature and explain the significance of that interpretation.
- Figurative Language (FIG-1) — Explain the function of specific words and phrases in a literary text, including connotative meanings and the effect of diction choices.
- Narration (NAR-1) — Explain the function of point of view in a narrative, including how a narrator's reliability, knowledge, and perspective shape meaning.
- Character (CHR-1) — Explain the function of a character, including how a character's choices and development contribute to the meaning of the work as a whole.
- AQA
- AO1 — Read, understand and respond to texts; maintain a critical style and develop an informed personal response; use textual references, including quotations, to support and illustrate interpretations.
- AO2 — Analyse the language, form and structure used by a writer to create meanings and effects, using relevant subject terminology where appropriate.
- AO3 — Show understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written and received.
- AO5 (Language Paper link) — Communicate clearly, effectively and imaginatively, selecting and adapting tone, style and register for different forms, purposes and audiences.
- Edexcel
- AO1 — Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated concepts and terminology, and coherent, accurate written expression.
- AO2 — Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts, with particular attention to the relationship between form, structure, and language.
- AO4 — Explore connections across literary texts, including the significance of context.
- IB Lit
- Criterion A — Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the text, including its content, context, and the author's choices.
- Criterion B — Analyse the ways in which the author's choices of language, structure, technique, and style shape meaning.
- Criterion C — Organise ideas in a focused, coherent, and convincing way, sustaining a line of argument throughout.
Storgy generator
Plan it for your class instead
Choose the curriculum, the year group, how many lessons you have, and what the sequence should be about. Grounded in Storgy's analysis of Klara and the Sun.
Teacher tools for
Klara and the Sun
Discussion Questions
Thematic and close-reading prompts, ready to ask.
Essay Prompts
Exam-style essay questions with assessment-objective focus.
Quiz Questions
Multiple-choice comprehension checks, ready to hand out.
Ask about this work
Put a question to the reader behind the guide. It cites the chapter it answers from.
Full study guide
Summaries, characters, themes, and key quotes.