Skip to content

The Annotated Edition

Sonnet 17 by William Shakespeare

Summary, meaning, line-by-line analysis & FAQ.

Read aloud in ~1 minOpen reading mode →

Shakespeare tells a young, attractive person that his poetry falls short of capturing their true beauty, suggesting that future readers would see it as an exaggeration.

Poet
William Shakespeare
Themes
beauty, love, mortality
The PoemFull text

Sonnet 17

William Shakespeare

Who will believe my verse in time to come, If it were fill’d with your most high deserts? Though yet heaven knows it is but as a tomb Which hides your life, and shows not half your parts. If I could write the beauty of your eyes, And in fresh numbers number all your graces, The age to come would say ‘This poet lies; Such heavenly touches ne’er touch’d earthly faces.’ So should my papers, yellow’d with their age, Be scorn’d, like old men of less truth than tongue, And your true rights be term’d a poet’s rage And stretched metre of an antique song: But were some child of yours alive that time, You should live twice,—in it, and in my rhyme.

Public domain

Sourced from Project Gutenberg

§01Quick summary

What this poem is about

Shakespeare tells a young, attractive person that his poetry falls short of capturing their true beauty, suggesting that future readers would see it as an exaggeration. He argues that the only way to achieve lasting legacy is through having a child and being celebrated in poetry. This is a clever compliment, cleverly disguised as false modesty.

§02Themes

Recurring themes

§03Line by line

Stanza by stanza, with notes

  1. Who will believe my verse in time to come, / If it were fill'd with your most high deserts?

    Editor's note

    Shakespeare starts with a rhetorical question: who in the future will believe a poem that praises someone so extravagantly? The word **deserts** refers to what the person truly deserves — their true worth. He introduces a paradox: the more sincerely he praises, the less credible the poem appears.

  2. Though yet heaven knows it is but as a tomb / Which hides your life, and shows not half your parts.

    Editor's note

    Even now, he acknowledges that his verse resembles a **tomb** — it keeps a name alive while hiding the vibrant reality beneath. A tomb indicates that someone was here; it can't reveal their true essence. **Parts** refer to qualities or gifts. The poem falls short of fully capturing its subject, and it hasn't even made an attempt yet.

  3. If I could write the beauty of your eyes, / And in fresh numbers number all your graces,

    Editor's note

    **Numbers** is an old term for verses or metrical lines, so the phrase 'fresh numbers number' is a clever play on words—new poems that tally up every grace. Shakespeare envisions the perfect version of his poem, one that truly reflects the subject's eyes and all their qualities, then quickly undermines that idea in the following lines.

  4. The age to come would say 'This poet lies; / Such heavenly touches ne'er touch'd earthly faces.'

    Editor's note

    Future readers, he predicts, will label him a liar. The beauty he's describing seems almost too divine — **heavenly touches** — to be associated with any real human face. This is both a compliment (you're so beautiful it feels unbelievable) and a real challenge for the goal of poetic immortality.

  5. So should my papers, yellow'd with their age, / Be scorn'd, like old men of less truth than tongue,

    Editor's note

    The physical aging of the manuscript reflects the diminishing credibility of its content. **Old men of less truth than tongue** refers to those who boast but lack reliability — essentially, braggarts. Shakespeare's yellowed pages would face similar dismissal: seen as the musings of an overly enthusiastic old poet.

  6. And your true rights be term'd a poet's rage / And stretched metre of an antique song:

    Editor's note

    **True rights** refers to the authentic recognition the subject truly deserves. **A poet's rage** signifies a fervent poetic outburst or exaggeration — the sort of dramatic overstatement that lovesick writers are known for. **Stretched metre** implies that the verse has been inflated or embellished to conform to the rhyme. The subject's true value might be dismissed as mere artistic inflation.

  7. But were some child of yours alive that time, / You should live twice,—in it, and in my rhyme.

    Editor's note

    The closing couplet presents the solution and the poem's true argument. A living child would serve as tangible evidence of the subject's beauty, lending credibility to the poem's claims. **Live twice** is the payoff: first through biological legacy and then through verse. The poem subtly asserts its own worth, even while feigning uncertainty.

§04Tone & mood

How this poem feels

The tone is warmly self-deprecating yet quietly confident. Shakespeare expresses humility by suggesting his poetry falls short, all while crafting a poem so elegant that it demonstrates the contrary. There's a subtle urgency beneath the surface, encouraging the subject to consider having children, and a playful wit in the irony that the most genuine praise can come off as the greatest falsehood.

§05Symbols & metaphors

Symbols & metaphors

The Tomb
A tomb holds a name but can't capture the complete essence of a living person. Shakespeare illustrates this by highlighting the limitations of poetry: while verse can commemorate, it also dulls and immobilizes what was once vibrant and full of life.
Yellowed Papers
The physical decay of old manuscripts illustrates how time can erode credibility. As the pages age, so does the trust that readers have in them — they turn into relics of a long-gone poet's passion instead of dependable sources.
The Child
The child embodies biological immortality and, importantly, serves as living proof. While a poem might be seen as an exaggeration, a beautiful child is irrefutable evidence — it confirms the poem's assertions in a way that words alone cannot achieve.
Heavenly Touches
Divine beauty that appears almost too flawless for a human face. It distinguishes the subject as someone whose qualities surpass what poetry or everyday human experience can reasonably convey.

§06Historical context

Historical context

Sonnet 17 is part of the **Fair Youth sequence**, which includes the first 126 of Shakespeare's 154 sonnets. These poems are addressed to a striking young man, whose identity remains uncertain. This sonnet wraps up the **Procreation Sonnets** (Sonnets 1–17), which all share a common theme: your beauty is too remarkable to fade away with you, so you should have children. In Sonnet 17, Shakespeare introduces a second kind of immortality through poetry, while still arguing that having a child is the strongest proof of one's legacy. He was writing during the 1590s, a time when sonnet sequences were quite popular in England, inspired by Philip Sidney's *Astrophil and Stella*. Concerns about legacy and the durability of art were significant in a culture where mass printing was not yet common, making it easy for manuscripts to deteriorate, circulate in limited numbers, and risk being forgotten or overlooked.

§07FAQ

Questions readers ask

It's about how poetry struggles to truly preserve someone's beauty and legacy. Shakespeare contends that his verses can't completely express the subject's qualities, and future readers might see such lofty praise as mere flattery — so having a child becomes the only real evidence of that beauty.

Read next

Poems in the same key