The Annotated Edition
Sonnet 17 by William Shakespeare
Shakespeare tells a young, attractive person that his poetry falls short of capturing their true beauty, suggesting that future readers would see it as an exaggeration.
- Themes
- beauty, love, mortality
§01Quick summary
What this poem is about
§02Themes
Recurring themes
§03Line by line
Stanza by stanza, with notes
Who will believe my verse in time to come, / If it were fill'd with your most high deserts?
Editor's note
Shakespeare starts with a rhetorical question: who in the future will believe a poem that praises someone so extravagantly? The word **deserts** refers to what the person truly deserves — their true worth. He introduces a paradox: the more sincerely he praises, the less credible the poem appears.
Though yet heaven knows it is but as a tomb / Which hides your life, and shows not half your parts.
Editor's note
Even now, he acknowledges that his verse resembles a **tomb** — it keeps a name alive while hiding the vibrant reality beneath. A tomb indicates that someone was here; it can't reveal their true essence. **Parts** refer to qualities or gifts. The poem falls short of fully capturing its subject, and it hasn't even made an attempt yet.
If I could write the beauty of your eyes, / And in fresh numbers number all your graces,
Editor's note
**Numbers** is an old term for verses or metrical lines, so the phrase 'fresh numbers number' is a clever play on words—new poems that tally up every grace. Shakespeare envisions the perfect version of his poem, one that truly reflects the subject's eyes and all their qualities, then quickly undermines that idea in the following lines.
The age to come would say 'This poet lies; / Such heavenly touches ne'er touch'd earthly faces.'
Editor's note
Future readers, he predicts, will label him a liar. The beauty he's describing seems almost too divine — **heavenly touches** — to be associated with any real human face. This is both a compliment (you're so beautiful it feels unbelievable) and a real challenge for the goal of poetic immortality.
So should my papers, yellow'd with their age, / Be scorn'd, like old men of less truth than tongue,
Editor's note
The physical aging of the manuscript reflects the diminishing credibility of its content. **Old men of less truth than tongue** refers to those who boast but lack reliability — essentially, braggarts. Shakespeare's yellowed pages would face similar dismissal: seen as the musings of an overly enthusiastic old poet.
And your true rights be term'd a poet's rage / And stretched metre of an antique song:
Editor's note
**True rights** refers to the authentic recognition the subject truly deserves. **A poet's rage** signifies a fervent poetic outburst or exaggeration — the sort of dramatic overstatement that lovesick writers are known for. **Stretched metre** implies that the verse has been inflated or embellished to conform to the rhyme. The subject's true value might be dismissed as mere artistic inflation.
But were some child of yours alive that time, / You should live twice,—in it, and in my rhyme.
Editor's note
The closing couplet presents the solution and the poem's true argument. A living child would serve as tangible evidence of the subject's beauty, lending credibility to the poem's claims. **Live twice** is the payoff: first through biological legacy and then through verse. The poem subtly asserts its own worth, even while feigning uncertainty.
§04Tone & mood
How this poem feels
§05Symbols & metaphors
Symbols & metaphors
- The Tomb
- A tomb holds a name but can't capture the complete essence of a living person. Shakespeare illustrates this by highlighting the limitations of poetry: while verse can commemorate, it also dulls and immobilizes what was once vibrant and full of life.
- Yellowed Papers
- The physical decay of old manuscripts illustrates how time can erode credibility. As the pages age, so does the trust that readers have in them — they turn into relics of a long-gone poet's passion instead of dependable sources.
- The Child
- The child embodies biological immortality and, importantly, serves as living proof. While a poem might be seen as an exaggeration, a beautiful child is irrefutable evidence — it confirms the poem's assertions in a way that words alone cannot achieve.
- Heavenly Touches
- Divine beauty that appears almost too flawless for a human face. It distinguishes the subject as someone whose qualities surpass what poetry or everyday human experience can reasonably convey.
§06Historical context
Historical context
§07FAQ
Questions readers ask
Read next