Skip to content
Storgy

The Annotated Edition

Prynne as a Prisoner, and Then Bastwick by Percy Bysshe Shelley

Summary, meaning, line-by-line analysis & FAQ.

Read aloud in ~5 minOpen reading mode →

This scene from Shelley's unfinished historical play about the English Civil War era captures the real-life trial of Puritan dissenter John Bastwick in Archbishop Laud's Court of Star Chamber.

Poet
Percy Bysshe Shelley
Core theme
Faith
The PoemFull text

Prynne as a Prisoner, and Then Bastwick

Percy Bysshe Shelley

LAUD: Bring forth the prisoner Bastwick: let the clerk Recite his sentence. CLERK: ‘That he pay five thousand Pounds to the king, lose both his ears, be branded With red-hot iron on the cheek and forehead, And be imprisoned within Lancaster Castle _5 During the pleasure of the Court.’ LAUD: Prisoner, If you have aught to say wherefore this sentence Should not be put into effect, now speak. JUXON: If you have aught to plead in mitigation, Speak. BASTWICK: Thus, my lords. If, like the prelates, I _10 Were an invader of the royal power A public scorner of the word of God, Profane, idolatrous, popish, superstitious, Impious in heart and in tyrannic act, Void of wit, honesty, and temperance; _15 If Satan were my lord, as theirs,—our God Pattern of all I should avoid to do; Were I an enemy of my God and King And of good men, as ye are;—I should merit Your fearful state and gilt prosperity, _20 Which, when ye wake from the last sleep, shall turn To cowls and robes of everlasting fire. But, as I am, I bid ye grudge me not The only earthly favour ye can yield, Or I think worth acceptance at your hands,— _25 Scorn, mutilation, and imprisonment. even as my Master did, Until Heaven’s kingdom shall descend on earth, Or earth be like a shadow in the light Of Heaven absorbed—some few tumultuous years _30 Will pass, and leave no wreck of what opposes His will whose will is power. NOTE: _27-_32 even...power printed as a fragment, Garnett, 1862; inserted here conjecturally, Rossetti, 1870. LAUD: Officer, take the prisoner from the bar, And be his tongue slit for his insolence. BASTWICK: While this hand holds a pen— LAUD: Be his hands— JUXON: Stop! _35 Forbear, my lord! The tongue, which now can speak No terror, would interpret, being dumb, Heaven’s thunder to our harm;... And hands, which now write only their own shame, With bleeding stumps might sign our blood away. _40 LAUD: Much more such ‘mercy’ among men would be, Did all the ministers of Heaven’s revenge Flinch thus from earthly retribution. I Could suffer what I would inflict. [EXIT BASTWICK GUARDED.] Bring up The Lord Bishop of Lincoln.— [TO STRAFFORD.] Know you not _45 That, in distraining for ten thousand pounds Upon his books and furniture at Lincoln, Were found these scandalous and seditious letters Sent from one Osbaldistone, who is fled? I speak it not as touching this poor person; _50 But of the office which should make it holy, Were it as vile as it was ever spotless. Mark too, my lord, that this expression strikes His Majesty, if I misinterpret not. [ENTER BISHOP WILLIAMS GUARDED.] STRAFFORD: ’Twere politic and just that Williams taste _55 The bitter fruit of his connection with The schismatics. But you, my Lord Archbishop, Who owed your first promotion to his favour, Who grew beneath his smile— LAUD: Would therefore beg The office of his judge from this High Court,— _60 That it shall seem, even as it is, that I, In my assumption of this sacred robe, Have put aside all worldly preference, All sense of all distinction of all persons, All thoughts but of the service of the Church.— _65 Bishop of Lincoln! WILLIAMS: Peace, proud hierarch! I know my sentence, and I own it just. Thou wilt repay me less than I deserve, In stretching to the utmost ... NOTE: Scene 3. _1-_69 Bring...utmost 1870; omitted 1824. SCENE 4:

Public domain

Sourced from Project Gutenberg

Study actions

Take the quizStudy sheet (PDF)

§01Quick summary

What this poem is about

This scene from Shelley's unfinished historical play about the English Civil War era captures the real-life trial of Puritan dissenter John Bastwick in Archbishop Laud's Court of Star Chamber. Bastwick stands firm, transforming his harsh sentence—ear-cropping, branding, imprisonment—into a badge of honor, boldly confronting his judges with the conviction of a man who feels history and God are on his side. The scene concludes with Bishop Williams, once a supporter of Laud, now confronting the same court that Laud dominates.

§02Themes

Recurring themes

§03Line by line

Stanza by stanza, with notes

  1. LAUD: Bring forth the prisoner Bastwick: let the clerk / Recite his sentence.

    Editor's note

    The scene begins in the midst of the Star Chamber proceedings. Laud runs the proceedings with a chilling efficiency—he doesn't ask for the sentence to be read; he commands it. The term 'prisoner' instantly robs Bastwick of any dignity Laud can take away. The clerk's subsequent recitation details a series of physical punishments: a five-thousand-pound fine, the removal of both ears, branding on the cheek and forehead, and indefinite imprisonment. Shelley presents the brutality starkly, without any commentary, allowing the facts to speak for themselves.

  2. JUXON: If you have aught to plead in mitigation, / Speak.

    Editor's note

    Juxon, the Bishop of London, gives Bastwick a standard opening — the court's idea of mercy. This is more of a procedural formality than a real invitation. Shelley divides the same question between Laud and Juxon to illustrate that the court presents a unified stance, and that stance shows no interest in what Bastwick truly wants to express.

  3. BASTWICK: Thus, my lords. If, like the prelates, I / Were an invader of the royal power

    Editor's note

    Bastwick's speech is the core of the scene. Rather than begging for mercy, he flips the court's logic on its head: *if* he were as corrupt, godless, tyrannical, and popish as the bishops, *then* he would be worthy of their gilded power and worldly comfort. The lengthy conditional ('If...If...If...Were I...') builds momentum like a wave before crashing down. He isn’t defending himself — he’s putting them on trial. The term 'gilt prosperity' is sharp: their wealth is flashy and empty, and when they die ('wake from the last sleep'), it will turn into 'cowls and robes of everlasting fire.'

  4. But, as I am, I bid ye grudge me not / The only earthly favour ye can yield,

    Editor's note

    Here the speech takes a turn. Bastwick completely dismisses the idea of being a victim. He describes scorn, mutilation, and imprisonment as "the only earthly favour" the court can offer him—because in his view, suffering for one's conscience signifies true righteousness. The following fragment (lines 27–32, added by Rossetti) expands on this idea into a prophecy: the forces that stand against God's will are only temporary, and "some few tumultuous years / Will pass, and leave no wreck of what opposes / His will whose will is power." This presents a concise vision of history as an unstoppable divine force.

  5. LAUD: Officer, take the prisoner from the bar, / And be his tongue slit for his insolence.

    Editor's note

    Laud reacts to Bastwick's defiance with a brutal immediacy: he orders his tongue to be slit. When Bastwick starts to respond ('While this hand holds a pen—'), Laud quickly moves to cut off his hands as well. This swift escalation reveals Laud not as a careful jurist but as someone whose authority can't stand any challenge. Shelley condenses the historical record to portray the tyranny as both personal and petty.

  6. JUXON: Stop! / Forbear, my lord! The tongue, which now can speak / No terror, would interpret, being dumb,

    Editor's note

    Juxon's intervention is the scene's most politically savvy moment. He doesn't advocate for mercy based on morality — he does so from a strategic standpoint. A silenced martyr, he cautions, speaks louder than a living critic. A man with bleeding stumps 'might sign our blood away.' Shelley gives Juxon a cold pragmatism that's almost more unsettling than Laud's fury, as it reveals the court's awareness of the power of symbols while still opting for cruelty.

  7. LAUD: Much more such 'mercy' among men would be, / Did all the ministers of Heaven's revenge / Flinch thus from earthly retribution.

    Editor's note

    Laud's scornful response — the scare quotes around 'mercy' highlight Shelley's irony — exposes how he views himself: as a tool of divine retribution rather than a political player. His claim that he 'could suffer what I would inflict' is intended to sound heroic but comes across as grotesque. Then, without missing a beat, he shifts to the next case: Bishop Williams, who faces charges related to seditious letters. The court's machinery continues to function.

  8. STRAFFORD: 'Twere politic and just that Williams taste / The bitter fruit of his connection with / The schismatics.

    Editor's note

    Strafford, who is allied with Laud, presents Williams's prosecution as both a matter of principle and a convenient choice. However, he also makes it clear to Laud that Williams was once his own supporter, the person whose backing contributed to Laud's ascent. In response, Laud crafts a compelling justification: he *desires* to judge his former benefactor to demonstrate his own impartiality. Shelley illustrates how power distorts the language of virtue, transforming ingratitude into a facade of integrity.

  9. WILLIAMS: Peace, proud hierarch! / I know my sentence, and I own it just.

    Editor's note

    Williams's brief entrance brings the scene to an unexpected close. Unlike Bastwick, he doesn't resist — he accepts his sentence and even calls it fair. This isn't submission; it's a different form of defiance: by agreeing with the court's decision, he strips Laud of his power to humiliate him. The scene cuts off mid-sentence ('In stretching to the utmost...'), left unfinished by Shelley, but that fragment holds its own weight — Williams is on the verge of saying that Laud's punishment is inadequate, a last act of self-control that denies Laud the satisfaction of being severe.

§04Tone & mood

How this poem feels

The tone is one of controlled fury — Shelley largely keeps his own voice out of the scene, allowing the dramatic irony to take center stage. Bastwick's speeches blaze with righteous defiance, Laud's lines resonate with a chilling institutional violence, and Juxon's pragmatic comments bring a different kind of threat. There’s no room for sentimentality here. Shelley viewed the historical Bastwick as a proto-revolutionary, and that respect shines through as the verse gives Bastwick the most compelling and prophetic language in the scene.

§05Symbols & metaphors

Symbols & metaphors

Ears, tongue, and hands
The body parts that Laud's sentence focuses on aren't just random — they represent the tools of speech and writing, the means of expressing dissent. Shelley highlights this with Juxon's warning: if you silence a man's tongue, his bleeding stumps create a more powerful message than anything he might have penned. Mutilating the body aims to silence the word.
Gilt prosperity
Bastwick's term for the bishops' wealth and influence. 'Gilt' instead of 'gold' — it suggests a superficial sheen, not genuine value. It also foreshadows the idea of their robes transforming into 'cowls of everlasting fire': the very garments that represent worldly power will ultimately turn into tools of damnation.
The last sleep
Bastwick uses a euphemism for death. When the bishops 'wake from the last sleep,' their gilded wealth will be exposed for what it truly is. This imagery depicts death as an awakening to judgment, turning the typical comfort of sleep as rest on its head.
The pen
Bastwick's unfinished line — 'While this hand holds a pen' — turns the pen into a symbol of everything Laud seeks to eliminate. It represents conscience, testimony, and the written record that endures beyond any single person. Juxon recognizes this, which is why he intervenes to prevent Laud from cutting off Bastwick's hands.
The sacred robe
Laud points to his 'sacred robe' as evidence that he has transcended personal loyalty and self-interest. However, in this context, the robe represents anything but the sacred; it serves as a symbol of institutional power wielded to punish a former supporter. Shelley uses this imagery to illustrate how religious authority is intertwined with political ambition.
Heaven's kingdom descending
The prophetic fragment in lines 27–32 presents the image of Heaven's kingdom descending to earth — or earth merging with Heaven's light — as the standard against which all earthly tyranny is assessed and revealed to be fleeting. This reflects Shelley's millennialism expressed through a Puritan perspective.

§06Form & structure

Form & structure

Meter
blank verse

§07Historical context

Historical context

John Bastwick was a Puritan physician and pamphleteer who, in 1637, faced a harsh sentence from the Court of Star Chamber — the crown's prerogative court that operated without a jury. He was fined, had his ears cut off, was branded, and sentenced to life imprisonment. On that day, he shared the dock with William Prynne and Henry Burton. Archbishop William Laud oversaw the proceedings and became the most reviled figure in Charles I's religious policy. Shelley wrote this dramatic fragment before his death in 1822 as part of a larger, unfinished historical drama centered on the English Civil War. He found inspiration in figures like Bastwick, viewing them as pioneers of political and religious liberty. The scene was first published in 1824, with a more complete version, including reconstructed lines, appearing in 1870. Shelley perceived the conflict between Laud and the Puritans as a reflection of the struggle between tyranny and freedom that he recognized in his own era.

§08FAQ

Questions readers ask

Was this an actual historical event?

Yes. In 1637, John Bastwick, along with William Prynne and Henry Burton, faced trial by the Court of Star Chamber, resulting in a sentence that included the loss of his ears, branding, and imprisonment. This trial became a significant moment in the clash between Charles I's government and Puritan dissenters, drawing large, sympathetic crowds to witness the public mutilation of the three men in Palace Yard. Laud's involvement in the trial led to him becoming one of the most hated figures in England — he was ultimately impeached and executed in 1645.

Why did Shelley write this as a play rather than a poem?

Shelley had a strong interest in using dramatic form to express political ideas — his The Cenci (1819) stands as his most complete verse drama. The courtroom scene provides a structure where conflicting voices can confront each other directly, without a narrator intervening. This choice allows him to give the most powerful language to the accused instead of a lyrical 'I,' making the defiance feel more rooted in history and less like Shelley is just sharing his own opinions.

What is the Court of Star Chamber?

The Star Chamber was an English court based in Westminster that functioned outside the common law system—meaning there was no jury, no right of habeas corpus, and sentences could involve physical punishment. The Stuart kings used it to go after political and religious opponents. Parliament put an end to it in 1641, partly in reaction to cases like that of Bastwick. Today, its name symbolizes arbitrary and secretive judicial power.

Why does Bastwick say scorn and mutilation are a 'favour'?

Bastwick operates within a Puritan view of suffering: being persecuted for one’s beliefs mirrors Christ’s example, turning what might be seen as shame into a mark of honour. By describing his punishment as 'the only earthly favour' the court can offer, he completely shifts the power dynamic — the court believes it's humiliating him, but in his perspective, it actually affirms his righteousness. Shelley, although not religious in a conventional way, found this reasoning compelling as a way to confront political oppression.

What is the significance of the lines marked as a fragment (27–32)?

Those lines — 'even as my Master did, / Until Heaven's kingdom shall descend on earth...' — were first published as a standalone fragment by Richard Garnett in 1862 and later included in the speech by William Michael Rossetti in 1870. Shelley did not finish the manuscript, so the placement is based on editorial interpretation, but it works well: the lines broaden Bastwick's defiance from personal endurance to a historical prophecy, suggesting that the forces against God's will are temporary and will leave 'no wreck.' Regardless of whether Shelley meant for them to be placed here, they help complete the speech's overall message.

Why does Juxon stop Laud from cutting off Bastwick's tongue and hands?

Juxon's reasoning is entirely strategic, lacking any compassion. He contends that a silenced martyr poses a greater threat than a vocal critic — that a man with a slit tongue becomes a living symbol interpreted by 'Heaven's thunder' for the crowd, and that bleeding stumps carry more political weight than a pen. This is one of Shelley's keenest insights in the scene: the court's pragmatism serves as the only limit to its cruelty, and even that limit stems from a desire for self-preservation rather than a sense of justice.

Who is Bishop Williams and why does Laud want to judge him?

John Williams, the Bishop of Lincoln, was once a supporter of Laud — the man who aided his advancement in the church. However, by the 1630s, they had become bitter rivals, and Laud leveraged the Star Chamber to prosecute Williams for seditious letters discovered during a property distraint. Strafford highlights the awkwardness of Laud judging his former benefactor; in response, Laud argues that judging Williams demonstrates his impartiality. Shelley uses this interaction to illustrate how institutional power transforms personal revenge into an act of virtue.

Is this poem finished?

No. It's part of a larger, unfinished historical drama that Shelley was writing before he died in 1822. The scene stops abruptly in the middle of Williams's speech, and the play — which focuses on the English Civil War period — was never finished. The version that most readers see today includes editorial choices made by Garnett and Rossetti many years after Shelley's death, such as where the prophetic fragment appears in lines 27–32.

Citation

Cite this poem

MLA

Shelley, Percy Bysshe. "Prynne as a Prisoner, and Then Bastwick." Storgy, https://storgy.com/poems/prynne-as-a-prisoner-and-then-bastwick-percy-bysshe-shelley/.

APA

Shelley, P. B. (n.d.). Prynne as a prisoner, and then bastwick. Storgy. https://storgy.com/poems/prynne-as-a-prisoner-and-then-bastwick-percy-bysshe-shelley/

TeacherAP Lit Q1 scaffold — preview

Row A — Thesis

1 pt

In Shelley's dramatic fragment 'Prynne as a Prisoner, and then Bastwick,' the courtroom staging serves as a vehicle for a radical political theology: those who wield earthly punishment are themselves condemned by the very divine order they …

  • Row B — Evidence + Commentary4 pts
  • Row C — Sophistication1 pt
  • Common student errors
Unlock the full scaffold

Available on any Storgy plan — model paragraphs, band callouts, and common student errors for every poem.

The study desk

Teaching materials and reference tools prepared for this poem.

InteractiveSelf-test

Take the quiz on this poem

Test your reading directly on the page — instant scoring, no signup, no printing.

ReferenceMLA · APA · Chicago

Cite this poem

A properly formatted citation for your essay or bibliography, typeset by deterministic rules — no AI involved.

Adjacent texts in the archive

More by Percy Bysshe Shelley

Browse all Percy Bysshe Shelley poems →

Themes in this poem

Poems about FaithPoems about FreedomPoems about IdentityPoems about Justice

Compared with

Compare this poem with any other →

Poetry tools

Analyze another poem →Rate your own poem →Check rhyme & meter →