The Annotated Edition
BY HOMER WILBUR, A.M. by James Russell Lowell
This poem narrates the tale of two brothers, North and South, who co-own a farm but have starkly contrasting work ethics and values.
- Themes
- anger, freedom, identity
§01Quick summary
What this poem is about
§02Themes
Recurring themes
§03Line by line
Stanza by stanza, with notes
Two brothers once, an ill-matched pair, / Together dwelt (no matter where),
Editor's note
Lowell begins with a fairy-tale scenario — two brothers who share an inheritance — but the parenthetical "no matter where" hints to the reader that this isn't just a straightforward farm tale. The brothers represent the Northern and Southern United States, and the "house and farm in common" symbolizes the American republic itself.
Stout Farmer North, with frugal care, / Laid up provision for his heir,
Editor's note
North is depicted as the quintessential Yankee: diligent, independent, and financially responsible. He sells ice, stone, and wood, always paying his debts in cash. While Lowell flatters his New England audience, this portrayal also establishes a moral contrast — North earns his keep, which highlights the South's later actions as even more outrageous.
On tother hand, his brother South / Lived very much from hand to mouth.
Editor's note
The South embodies the gentleman-planter archetype: leisurely, burdened by debt, and influenced by cockpits and bar rooms. His version of "farming" consists solely of raising herds of long-legged pigs—Lowell's metaphor for enslaved individuals, whose labor and presence continuously generate expenses and challenges for the North. The fact that the North still purchases the inexpensive pork serves as a biting critique of its complicity in the slave economy.
Meanwhile, South's swine increasing fast; / His farm became too small at last;
Editor's note
This stanza connects clearly to the debates over territorial expansion in the 1840s and 1850s. The South's push for new slave territories — Kansas, Nebraska, Texas — is illustrated through the metaphor of a pig farmer needing more land. The South's offer to the North ("You provide the funds, and I'll purchase the land") reflects the political reality that Northern money and concessions consistently supported Southern expansion.
Poor North, whose Anglo-Saxon blood / Gave him a hankering after mud,
Editor's note
North agrees to the deal but quickly has second thoughts, realizing the new land is useless without a fence to keep South's pigs out. He instinctively wants to split the land evenly. The reference to "Anglo-Saxon blood" shows Lowell's dry humor about the North's desire for land—something South takes advantage of. North's doubts and final agreement illustrate the Northern political surrender.
But somehow South could ne'er incline / This way or that to run the line,
Editor's note
South keeps putting off drawing the boundary, constantly coming up with new excuses. This reflects the tendency of Southern politicians to obstruct or delay any compromise that might actually restrict the expansion of slavery. When South eventually presents his "generous" offer — no fence at all, just take what you need — it seems reasonable but is actually meant to allow his pigs to wander freely.
'Agreed!' cried North; thought he, This fall / With wheat and rye I'll sow it all;
Editor's note
North believes he can outsmart South by planting the entire field before him. This moment of hope quickly falls apart. When he inspects his crop, he discovers that South's pigs have devoured every single stalk. The scene — the soil "alive and moving" with rooting, grunting pigs — is both vivid and humorous, but the frustration beneath it is genuine.
Off in a rage he rushed to South, / 'My wheat and rye'--grief choked his mouth:
Editor's note
The dialogue that follows serves as the poem's most biting satire. South answers every complaint with a vague non-answer: the grain won't harm the pigs, North should have planted differently, and the land is available to everyone. When North insists that South keep his pigs away, South retorts, "Did I create them with a snout?" — a striking parody of the pro-slavery argument that portrays slavery as a natural state rather than a human decision.
'Your rights,' says tother, 'well, that's funny, / _I_ bought the land'--
Editor's note
The argument becomes a messy legal and moral dispute. South asserts ownership since he negotiated the purchase, while North argues his claim based on having paid the money. South withdraws into notions of "abstract justice" and Latin sayings (*Obsta principiis* — resist at the beginning, which ironically highlights North's failure to do so). The poem concludes with South whistling, unfazed, as North walks home with clenched fists, hearing something "clicking" in his ears — the sound of a gun being cocked, a war being prepared.
New England was not so much the colony of a mother country, as a Hagar driven forth into the wilderness.
Editor's note
The prose section moves from allegory to straightforward argument. In this piece, Lowell, adopting the persona of the fictional Reverend Homer Wilbur, stands up for the true nature of the Yankee character against stereotypes. He connects New England's resilience to its Puritan origins — individuals who ventured not in search of riches but for the sake of self-governance, confronting starvation and the wilderness without wavering. The biblical reference to Hagar (who was cast out yet persevered) positions New England as the aggrieved party that has endured hardship.
As Want was the prime foe these hardy exodists had to fortress themselves against...
Editor's note
Lowell contends that Yankee thrift and practicality aren't moral shortcomings; they're survival skills developed over two centuries. The depiction is warm yet truthful — the Yankee is inventive and resourceful, not particularly concerned with aesthetics, but skilled at making the best of things. The final comparison to the Englishman from two centuries past implies that New England has maintained something genuine that England has lost, anchoring Northern identity in a richer and more principled history.
§04Tone & mood
How this poem feels
§05Symbols & metaphors
Symbols & metaphors
- South's swine
- The pigs represent Lowell's key symbol for slavery and the enslaved workforce. They reproduce, demand more land, and ruin what others create, while the South avoids taking responsibility for managing them. The North's continued purchase of inexpensive pork adds another layer to the symbol — it highlights that the North profits from the system even as it voices criticism.
- The fence (or lack of one)
- The fence represents any legal or political boundary that restricts the spread of slavery into new territories. The South's ongoing delay in "running the line" reflects the historical failures of compromises like the Missouri Compromise and the Kansas-Nebraska Act, where the boundary was repeatedly pushed back or completely erased.
- The new land
- The jointly purchased farm plot reflects the new western territories gained after the Mexican-American War. The key political question of Lowell's time was about who could use these lands and under what conditions. The North funds it, while the South's pigs benefit from it — this imbalance is the crux of the poem's argument.
- Something clicking in North's ear
- The poem's final image — an unspecified clicking sound — carries a deliberately ominous tone. It evokes the idea of a gun being cocked, a clock winding down, or the preparation of a war machine. By leaving it unnamed, Lowell heightens the sense of threat. The Civil War can be heard, but it remains out of sight.
- North's clenched fists
- "Each brown paw / Clenched like a knot of natural law" — these fists show that North's patience has come to an end. The term "natural law" is significant: North isn't merely upset; he feels that a basic right of his has been infringed. This represents both the moral and legal justification for his confrontation.
- The shared house and farm
- The property the brothers share is the United States itself—a republic they built together, which is now struggling with deep divisions. Its origins from "Uncle Sam, or someone" link it directly to the national legacy, a founding agreement that both sides assert but interpret in vastly different ways.
§06Historical context
Historical context
§07FAQ
Questions readers ask
Read next