Skip to content

ANOTHER JUDGE. by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow: Summary, Meaning & Analysis

Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

This brief poem features one speaker who refuses to accept a decision, pointing out that exiled men—those who faced death if they returned—are now living back home without issue.

The poem
I cannot give consent, while other men Who have been banished upon pain of death Are now in their own houses here among us.

Public domain · sourced from Project Gutenberg

Quick summary
This brief poem features one speaker who refuses to accept a decision, pointing out that exiled men—those who faced death if they returned—are now living back home without issue. The speaker recognizes a double standard: how can he support punishing or judging someone when others who violated the same rules are free to roam? It's a poignant three-line protest against the hypocrisy found in the justice system.
Themes

Line-by-line

I cannot give consent, while other men / Who have been banished upon pain of death
The speaker firmly refuses to accept any verdict, sentence, or official act. He quickly explains his reasoning: there are other men who faced exile under the threat of death, the most severe punishment for returning. His straightforward "I cannot" conveys a sense of moral conviction rather than personal anger. He isn't furious; he's clearly establishing a boundary.

Tone & mood

The speaker remains firm and composed. He isn’t shouting; instead, he’s calmly asserting his principles. Beneath his straightforward words lies a sense of controlled indignation, indicative of someone who has carefully considered his stance and is resolute in it.

Symbols & metaphors

  • BanishmentExile represents the harshest form of official punishment—it's the state's most severe non-lethal measure. The reality that banished individuals are now living freely at home highlights the difference between the law as it’s written and how it’s actually enforced.
  • ConsentThe act of giving consent implies complicity. The speaker's refusal to consent is his way of rejecting a system he views as selectively enforced and, as a result, unfair.
  • Their own housesHome—the specific detail of men living in their own houses—brings the hypocrisy into focus. These aren't just abstractions; they're our neighbors. The domestic scene highlights the injustice.

Historical context

Longfellow included this poem in his *Christus: A Mystery* trilogy, completed in 1872. This ambitious work spans three parts and explores the history of Christianity. This particular fragment is part of the second section, *The Golden Legend*, or perhaps the third, *The New England Tragedies*, which dramatizes the Puritan persecution of Quakers and other dissenters in colonial Massachusetts. Longfellow was deeply disturbed by the hypocrisy he saw in legal and moral matters, especially regarding punishment and exile. The poem feels like a courtroom address, with a judge or official hesitant to simply approve a decision. It highlights Longfellow's ongoing concern about the disconnect between the law's stated ideals and how they are actually enforced. Written in the aftermath of the Civil War, it also resonates with the debates from the Reconstruction era about justice, amnesty, and who is allowed to return home.

FAQ

A speaker — probably a judge or official — declines to approve a legal decision because men who were exiled under the threat of death are already living freely at home. He's highlighting the uneven application of the law and wants no part in it.

Similar poems