The pseudo-science of astrology, seeking to tell commonplace
fortunes by the stars.
25-26. Clear fame: Compare Milton's _Lycidas:_
"Fame is the spur that the clear spirit doth raise
To scorn delights and live laborious days."
The Annotated Edition
The pseudo-science of astrology, seeking to tell commonplace by James Russell Lowell
Read aloud in ~1 minOpen reading mode →
This poem critiques astrology, calling it a false science that falsely claims to predict human destinies based on the stars.
- Themes
- art, doubt, identity
§01Quick summary
What this poem is about
This poem critiques astrology, calling it a false science that falsely claims to predict human destinies based on the stars. Lowell contrasts the vast, indifferent cosmos with the trivial "commonplace" fortunes that people seek, reinforcing his argument. By referencing Milton's *Lycidas*, he introduces the notion of true fame achieved through effort, contrasting it with the easy shortcuts that astrology offers.
§02Themes
Recurring themes
§03Line by line
Stanza by stanza, with notes
The pseudo-science of astrology, seeking to tell commonplace / fortunes by the stars.
Editor's note
Lowell dismisses astrology as a *pseudo-science* from the start — no qualification, no reverence. The term 'commonplace' carries significant weight here: the fortunes people seek are mundane, even trivial, which makes the contrast with the grand, ancient stars almost humorous. He suggests that the entire venture reduces the universe to mere gossip.
§04Tone & mood
How this poem feels
Lowell comes across as skeptical and somewhat contemptuous, but definitely not mean-spirited. He seems to view the whole situation as more absurd than threatening. The reference to Milton elevates the tone toward something more serious at the end, reminding us that true glory is earned through effort, not just by analyzing charts.
§05Symbols & metaphors
Symbols & metaphors
- The stars
- In astrology, the stars are often seen as a map of human fate, but Lowell suggests that they are too grand and indifferent to convey such personal messages. Instead, they represent the true vastness of the universe, which astrology tends to simplify.
- Commonplace fortunes
- The word 'commonplace' suggests that what people look for in astrology isn’t wisdom or truth but a sense of reassurance regarding daily issues like money, love, and luck. It highlights the disconnect between the vastness of the cosmos and the smallness of human worries.
- Clear fame (via Milton)
- Borrowed from *Lycidas*, 'clear fame' signifies a genuine, hard-earned reputation — contrasting sharply with the easy fate that astrology suggests. This phrase supports the poem's underlying message that true success isn’t written in the stars; it must be experienced firsthand.
§06Historical context
Historical context
James Russell Lowell (1819–1891) was a poet, critic, and diplomat born in Boston, emerging as a prominent figure during the American Renaissance alongside Emerson, Longfellow, and Thoreau. He was deeply concerned with issues of intellectual integrity and social progress, showing little tolerance for superstition masquerading as knowledge. By the mid-1800s, astrology was enjoying a resurgence in both Britain and America, marketed through almanacs and social gatherings. Lowell's labeling of it as a "pseudo-science" clearly positions him on the rationalist side of an ongoing cultural debate. His reference to Milton's *Lycidas* (1637) showcases his scholarly tendencies: he invokes a classic text to strengthen his moral argument, contrasting the lazy fatalism of astrology with Milton's idea of fame achieved through diligent, intentional effort.
§07FAQ
Questions readers ask
He argues that astrology lacks intellectual value — a pseudo-science that flatters individuals into believing the universe cares about their mundane, everyday issues. By labeling the fortunes it offers as 'commonplace,' he implies that the entire practice deserves little serious consideration.
Milton's lines on fame emphasize that a lasting reputation comes from hard, disciplined work — not from having your destiny dictated by a star chart. Lowell draws this comparison to suggest that true achievement demands effort, rather than relying on cosmic shortcuts.
'Pseudo' refers to something that is false or fake. A pseudo-science appears to be a science — it has its own terminology, charts, and methods — but it fails under rational examination. Lowell uses the term to undermine astrology's intellectual credibility before he even presents his argument.
It refers to something that is ordinary, unremarkable, or even dull. Lowell is highlighting that the fortunes provided by astrology aren't profound truths; they're just vague, everyday predictions that anyone could come up with — which makes the idea of interpreting them from the stars seem absurd.
It comes off as anti-astrology in particular. Lowell was a product of his time, valuing deep moral and spiritual reflection. His criticism is directed at the commercialized and superstitious nature of fortune-telling, rather than at religious beliefs.
Based on the surviving fragment, it appears to be more like discursive prose-poetry or a verse essay instead of a rigid formal lyric. Lowell frequently employed this more relaxed, essay-like style when presenting an argument, allowing the logic to dictate the rhythm instead of adhering to a strict metre.
Lowell wrote for an educated, literary American audience — the type of reader who would recognize the Milton reference without needing a footnote. As a Harvard professor and editor of *The Atlantic Monthly*, he assumed his readers were curious, well-read, and willing to engage in a debate.
Read next