The Annotated Edition
The Duel by Eugene Field
A gingham dog and a calico cat are perched on a table, where they get into such a fierce fight that they actually devour each other, leaving no trace behind.
- Poet
- Eugene Field
- Core theme
- Anger
Study actions
§01Quick summary
What this poem is about
§02Themes
Recurring themes
§03Line by line
Stanza by stanza, with notes
The gingham dog and the calico cat / Side by side on the table sat;
Editor's note
Field sets the scene with two household objects—a stuffed dog made of gingham and a calico cat—sitting together on a table at half-past midnight. Neither can sleep, and even the clock and plate seem to sense trouble brewing. The narrator quickly distances himself from the story by calling the Chinese plate his source, introducing the poem's ongoing joke about unreliable witnesses.
The gingham dog went "bow-wow-wow!" / And the calico cat replied "mee-ow!"
Editor's note
The fight breaks out. Within an hour, the air fills with torn fabric — bits of gingham and calico fluttering everywhere. The Dutch clock covers its face with its hands, unable to bear a "family row." That word *family* is a small but revealing detail: these two live in the same house and are treated like kin, which makes their mutual destruction feel more intense. The narrator reminds us once more that the clock is his only source.
The Chinese plate looked very blue, / And wailed, "Oh, dear! what shall we do!"
Editor's note
The plate feels distressed but powerless. Meanwhile, the dog and cat are fiercely going after each other with every tooth and claw in what Field describes as "the awfullest way you ever saw." The exclamation and the italicized *awfullest* are a clear comic exaggeration — Field is playing it up for a young audience while the plate anxiously wrings its hands. The narrator pops in again to remind us that the plate is his source, keeping the humor going.
Next morning, where the two had sat / They found no trace of dog or cat;
Editor's note
The punchline hits hard: both animals have vanished. Field briefly suggests that burglars might have taken them, but quickly chuckles at the thought—the reality is they ended up eating each other. The last couplet gives the Dutch clock its due credit, wrapping up the whole unreliable-narrator theme. The tone feels mock-serious, almost like delivering a grave verdict on an utterly ridiculous situation.
§04Tone & mood
How this poem feels
§05Symbols & metaphors
Symbols & metaphors
- The gingham dog and calico cat
- On the surface, they appear to be just fabric toys or decorative objects, but they represent any two parties whose differences escalate into overwhelming conflict. Their names, based solely on the material they're crafted from, imply that they are trapped in rigid identities that hinder any possibility of compromise.
- The Dutch clock and Chinese plate
- These bystander objects symbolize the witnesses observing conflict unfold but unable to intervene. They also highlight the poem's ongoing joke about how unreliable secondhand accounts can be—everything we "know" comes from these everyday household items.
- Bits of gingham and calico flying through the air
- The literal shredding of the combatants' own physical bodies paints a striking picture of self-destruction. When you push yourself to the brink of mutual annihilation, you don't just lose the battle — you lose a piece of yourself.
- Half-past twelve (midnight)
- The witching hour unfolds beyond the bounds of normal, supervised time. With no adults or owners around, the conflict can escalate unchecked, reaching its extreme conclusion.
§06Form & structure
Form & structure
- Meter
- anapestic tetrameter
- Rhyme
- AABBAABBB AABBCCABB AABBCCAAB AABBCCABB
§07Historical context
Historical context
§08FAQ
Questions readers ask
What is the poem actually about — are the dog and cat real animals?
No. They're fabric objects—a stuffed or decorative dog made from gingham cloth and a cat made from calico cloth. Field treats them as if they're alive, which is the main comedic idea. Some readers also see them as symbols for any two rivals who just can't stop bickering.
Why does the narrator keep saying "the Chinese plate told me so"?
It's the poem's ongoing joke. The narrator wasn't present, so he keeps referencing his sources — the Dutch clock and the Chinese plate — much like a reporter would cite witnesses. The humor lies in the fact that these sources are inanimate objects, making the entire account comically unreliable.
What does "gingham" and "calico" mean?
Both are types of cotton fabric. Gingham features a checked or plaid design, typically in two colors. Calico is adorned with small floral or geometric patterns on a white or off-white background. Field picked them because they look different from each other, making it easy to imagine their bits fluttering through the air.
Is there a deeper meaning, or is it just a funny kids' poem?
Both things are true at once. At first glance, it seems like a comic tall tale meant for kids. However, the ending—where two creatures that share a home end up destroying each other completely—delivers a powerful message about how unchecked conflict leads to mutual destruction. Field doesn’t preach; he simply allows the ridiculous outcome to convey its own truth.
What is the poem's rhyme scheme and meter?
Each stanza consists of nine lines and has a lively anapestic rhythm — that upbeat "da-da-DUM" cadence that adds energy to nursery rhymes. The rhyme scheme tightly connects the lines (AABBBCCB in the first stanza, with some variations), and Field includes a parenthetical couplet at the end of each stanza to share the narrator's side note on their sources.
Why does the Dutch clock "put its hands before its face"?
It's a visual pun. The clock hands act as the arms of the clock face, effectively making the clock cover its face with its hands — just like a person might do when they can't bear to watch something terrible. Field is having fun with the double meanings of "hands" and "face" on a clock.
What does "family row" mean in the second stanza?
A "row" (rhymes with "cow") is a British term from the 19th century that refers to a noisy quarrel or fight. When we call it a family row, it suggests that the dog and cat belong to the same household — practically relatives — which adds an ironic and somewhat sad twist to their all-out war, even amidst the comedy.
When was "The Duel" written and where was it published?
Field wrote this poem in 1894, and it appeared in his collection Love-Songs of Childhood, also released that same year. He passed away in 1895, making this collection one of his last works. The poem has been in continuous print ever since and is among his most frequently anthologized pieces.
Citation
Cite this poem
MLA
Field, Eugene. "The Duel." Storgy, https://storgy.com/poems/the-duel-eugene-field/.
APA
Field, E. (n.d.). The duel. Storgy. https://storgy.com/poems/the-duel-eugene-field/
Row A — Thesis
1 ptEugene Field's "The Duel" employs an unreliable domestic narrator and the comic spectacle of mutual annihilation to suggest that cheerful storytelling can maintain a distance from genuine violence — not by denying it, but by embedding it …
- Row B — Evidence + Commentary4 pts
- Row C — Sophistication1 pt
- Common student errors
Available on any Storgy plan — model paragraphs, band callouts, and common student errors for every poem.
The study desk
Teaching materials and reference tools prepared for this poem.
Adjacent texts in the archive
Read next