Skip to content

The Annotated Edition

FIVE CRITICISMS by Alfred Noyes

Summary, meaning, line-by-line analysis & FAQ.

Alfred Noyes delivers five pointed critiques of the literary and political trends of his time: the cynical love-triangle novel, the obsession with novelty over truth, revolutionary envy, self-satisfied realism that ignores the soul, and the intellectual assault on moral values in significant literature.

Poet
Alfred Noyes
Year
1922
The PoemFull text

FIVE CRITICISMS

Alfred Noyes, 1922

I. (_On many recent novels by the conventional unconventionalists_.) Old Pantaloon, lean-witted, dour and rich, After grim years of soul-destroying greed, Weds Columbine, that April-blooded witch "Too young" to know that gold was not her need. Then enters Pierrot, young, rebellious, warm, With well-lined purse, to teach the fine-souled wife That the old fool's gold should aid a world-reform (Confused with sex). This wrecks the old fool's life. O, there's no doubt that Pierrot was clever, Quick to break hearts and quench the dying flame; But why, for his own pride, does Pierrot never Choose his own mate, work for his own high aim, Stand on his feet, and pay for his own tune? Why scold, cheat, rob and kill poor Pantaloon? II. (_On a certain goddess, acclaimed as "new" but known in Babylon._) I saw the assembled artists of our day Waiting for light, for music and for song. A woman stood before them, fresh as May And beautiful; but, in that modish throng, None heeded her. They said, "In our first youth Surely, long since, your hair was touched with grey." "I do not change," she answered. "I am Truth." "Old and banal," they sneered, and turned away. Then came a formless thing, with breasts dyed scarlet. The roses in her hair were green and blue. "I am new," she said. "I change, and Death knows why." Then with the eyes and gesture of a harlot She led them all forth, whinneying, "New, how new! Tell us your name!" She answered, "The New Lie." III. (_On Certain of the Bolsheviki "Idealists."_) With half the force and thought you waste in rage Over your neighbor's house, or heart of stone, You might have built your own new heritage, O fools, have you no hands, then, of your own? Where is your pride? Is this your answer still, This the red flag that burns above our strife, This the new cry that rings from Pisgah hill, "_Our neighbor's money, or our neighbor's life_"? Be prouder. Let us build that nobler state With our own hands, with our own muscle and brain! Your very victories die in hymns of hate; And your own envies are your heaviest chain. Is there no rebel proud enough to say "We'll stand on our own feet, and win the day"? IV. (_On Certain Realists._) You with the quick sardonic eye For all the mockeries of life, Beware, in this dark masque of things that seem, Lest even that tragic irony, Which you discern in this our mortal strife, Trick you and trap you, also, with a dream. Last night I saw a dead man borne along The city streets, passing a boisterous throng That never ceased to laugh and shout and dance: And yet, and yet, For all the poison bitter minds might brew From themes like this, I knew That the stern Truth would not permit her glance Thus to be foiled by flying straws of chance, For her keen eyes on deeper skies are set, And laws that tragic ironists forget. She saw the dead man's life, from birth to death,-- All that he knew of love and sin and pain, Success and failure (not as this world sees), His doubts, his passions, inner loss and gain, And borne on darker tides of constant law Beyond the margin of this life she saw All that had left his body with the breath. These things, to her, were still realities. If any mourned for him unseen, She saw them, too. If none, she'd not pretend His clay were colder, or his God less true, Or that his grave, at length, would be less green. She'd not deny The boundless depths of her eternal sky Brooding above a boundless universe, Because he seemed to man's unseeing eye Going a little further to fare worse; Nor would she assume he lacked that unseen friend Whom even the tragic ironists declare Were better than the seen, in his last end. Oh, then, beware, beware, Lest in the strong name of "reality" You mock yourselves anew with shapes of air, Lest it be you, agnostics, who re-write The fettering creeds of night, Affirm you know your own Unknowable, And lock the winged soul in a new hell; Lest it be you, lip-worshippers of Truth, Who break the heart of youth; Lest it be you, the realists, who fight With shadows, and forget your own pure light; Lest it be you who, with a little shroud Snatched from the sightless faces of the dead, Hoodwink the world, and keep the mourner bowed In dust, real dust, with stones, real stones, for bread; Lest, as you look one eighth of an inch beneath The yellow skin of death, You dream yourselves discoverers of the skull That old _memento mori_ of our faith; Lest it be you who hunt a flying wraith Through this dissolving stuff of hill and cloud; Lest it be you, who, at the last, annul Your covenant with your kind; Lest it be you who darken heart and mind, Sell the strong soul in bondage to a dream, And fetter us once more to things that seem. V (_An Answer_) [After reading an article in a leading London journal by an "intellectual" who attacked one of the noblest poets and greatest artists of a former century (or any century) on the ground that his high ethical standards were incompatible with the new lawlessness. This vicious lawlessness the writer described definitely, and he paid his tribute to dishonour as openly and brutally as any of the Bolsheviki could have done. I had always known that this was the real ground of the latter-day onslaught on some of the noblest literature of the past; but I had never seen it openly confessed before. The time has now surely come when, if our civilization is to make any fight at all against the new "red ruin and breaking up of laws," we must cease to belaud our slack-minded, latter-day "literature of rebellion" for its cleverness in making scraps of paper out of the plain laws of right and wrong. It has been doing this for more than twenty-five years, and the same has become fashionable among those who are too busy to read carefully or understand fully what pitfalls are being prepared for their own feet and the feet of their children.] I If this were true, England indeed were dead. If the wild fashion of that poisonous hour Wherein the new Salome, clothed with power, Wriggled and hissed, with hands and feet so red, Should even now demand that glorious head, Whose every word was like an English flower, Whose every song an English April shower, Whose every thought immortal wine and bread; If this were true, if England should prefer Darkness, corruption, and the adulterous crew, Shakespeare and Browning would cry shame on her, And Milton would deny the land he knew; And those who died in Flanders yesterday Would thank their God they sleep in cleaner clay. II It is not true. Only these "rebel" wings, These glittering clouds of "intellectual" flies Out of the stagnant pools of midnight rise From the old dead creeds, with carrion-poisoned stings They strike at noble and ignoble things, Immortal Love with the old world's out-worn lies, But even now, a wind from clearer skies Dissolves in smoke their coteries and wings. See, their divorced idealist re-divorces The wife he stole from his own stealing friend! And _these_ would pluck the high stars from their courses, And mock the fools that praise them, till the end! Well, let the whole world praise them. Truth can wait Till our new England shall unlock the gate. III Yes. Let the fools go paint themselves with woad, For we've a jest between us, Truth and I. We know that those who live by fashion die Also by fashion, and that mode kills mode. We know the great new age is on the road, And death is at the heart of every lie. But we've a jest between us, Truth and I. And we have locked the doors to our abode. Yet if some great new "rebel" in his pride Should pass that way and hear us laughing low Like lovers, in the darkness, side by side, He might catch this:--"The dullards do not know That names are names. New 'rebel' is old 'thrall.'" And we're the lonely dreamers after all.

Public domain

Sourced from Project Gutenberg

§01Quick summary

What this poem is about

Alfred Noyes delivers five pointed critiques of the literary and political trends of his time: the cynical love-triangle novel, the obsession with novelty over truth, revolutionary envy, self-satisfied realism that ignores the soul, and the intellectual assault on moral values in significant literature. Each section addresses a unique form of cultural dishonesty—individuals who disguise selfishness, nihilism, or cruelty as progress. In the end, Noyes and Truth share a quiet laugh, assured that every trendy falsehood ultimately collapses under its own weight.

§02Themes

Recurring themes

§03Line by line

Stanza by stanza, with notes

  1. Old Pantaloon, lean-witted, dour and rich, / After grim years of soul-destroying greed,

    Editor's note

    **Poem I** features classic commedia dell'arte characters — Pantaloon (the stingy old man), Columbine (the young wife), and Pierrot (the romantic outsider) — to satirize a common narrative Noyes noticed in modern fiction: a young idealist charms a wealthy man's wife, claiming it's an act of social change. The choice of sonnet form is intentional; Noyes shapes the love-triangle storyline into a neat argument, only to deflate it with the final couplet's straightforward question: why does the so-called great rebel never create anything of his own?

  2. I saw the assembled artists of our day / Waiting for light, for music and for song.

    Editor's note

    **Poem II** is a brief allegory. A simple, beautiful woman who identifies as Truth is overlooked by the trendy crowd because she seems too ordinary. Then, a bizarre, flashy figure appears — roses in unnatural hues, breasts painted bright red — and the crowd rushes after her. The twist is her name: "The New Lie." Noyes suggests that the avant-garde's fixation on novelty isn't freedom but rather the age-old deception known since ancient Babylon.

  3. With half the force and thought you waste in rage / Over your neighbor's house, or heart of stone,

    Editor's note

    **Poem III** speaks directly to revolutionaries inspired by Bolshevism. Noyes isn't denouncing the pursuit of a better society—he actually advocates for a "nobler state." However, he points out that the movement’s drive is often fueled by envy and resentment towards what others possess, rather than by the pride of creating something new. He notes that the red flag has come to symbolize "our neighbor's money or our neighbor's life," and that this envy is the heaviest burden the revolutionaries bear.

  4. You with the quick sardonic eye / For all the mockeries of life,

    Editor's note

    **Poem IV** is the longest and most philosophically deep of the five. It speaks to literary realists and agnostics who rely on irony and materialism to drain life of its meaning. Noyes's key argument is to flip their own approach back at them: by claiming that death is just extinction and that nothing exists beyond what we can see, they aren't being more honest than believers — they're merely replacing one set of unverifiable claims with another. The poem uses the image of Truth observing a dead man's entire life, including what occurs after his last breath, to suggest that a truly open mind cannot dismiss the unseen. It cautions that "realists" risk becoming the new dogmatists, confining the soul in a different type of prison.

  5. If this were true, England indeed were dead. / If the wild fashion of that poisonous hour

    Editor's note

    **Poem V** is a sequence of three sonnets that responds to a particular provocation: a critic who criticized a prominent Victorian poet (likely Tennyson or Browning) for claiming that his moral seriousness clashed with modern freedom. In Sonnet I, the image of Salome demanding a noble head frames this criticism as an execution, calling on Shakespeare, Milton, and the fallen in Flanders as witnesses who would feel ashamed. Sonnet II dismisses the dissenters as flies emerging from stagnant pools — their "divorced idealist" divorces again, revealing the emptiness of their beliefs. Sonnet III concludes the sequence with a sense of quiet confidence: Noyes and Truth share a private laugh, aware that each trend is ultimately replaced by the next, and that the real act of rebellion is to cling to something enduring. The final twist — "New 'rebel' is old 'thrall'" — delivers the poem's sharpest insight.

§04Tone & mood

How this poem feels

The overall tone is combative yet controlled — imagine a man who has been patient for a long time and has finally chosen to express his true thoughts. In Poems I, II, and III, the wit is dry and slightly contemptuous. Poem IV transitions into a more sincere and elegiac tone, almost pastoral in its tenderness toward the unnamed deceased man. Poem V begins with real anger but then settles into a sense of serene amusement. Throughout, Noyes writes with the conviction that he is on the right side of history, which lends the entire sequence an unusual confidence for a poet challenging the norms of his time.

§05Symbols & metaphors

Symbols & metaphors

Pantaloon, Columbine, and Pierrot
The commedia dell'arte trio represents a familiar plot that Noyes noticed being recycled in contemporary fiction: the cynical triangle of wealthy older characters, youthful beauty, and the self-proclaimed rebel. By relying on these theatrical archetypes, the so-called "daring" modern novel ends up feeling like a worn-out pantomime.
Truth as a plain, beautiful woman
Truth is depicted as a figure that remains unchanged, which often leads people to see her as outdated. Her simplicity is intentional — real truth doesn’t require embellishments or trends to hold weight. This stark contrast with the flashy "New Lie" enhances the allegory both visually and intellectually.
The New Lie's dyed roses and scarlet breasts
The unnatural colors — green and blue roses, artificially reddened skin — reveal that the trendy avant-garde distorts nature while pretending to offer freedom. The harlot imagery links the obsession with novelty to prostitution: peddling something fake for quick gains.
The dead man carried through the city streets
In Poem IV, the image of a corpse moving through a laughing, indifferent crowd serves as a classic representation of meaningless death for realists. Noyes embraces this image but offers a new perspective: Truth encompasses the entirety of the dead man's life, rather than focusing solely on his moment of death. The body transforms into a case study for understanding what it truly means to "see clearly."
Salome
In the first sonnet of Poem V, Salome—the biblical dancer who famously asked for John the Baptist's head—symbolizes the trendy intellectual culture that seeks to dismantle a significant moral poet. This imagery connects artistic transgression to actual murder and positions the critic's assault as a violent act against civilization.
Locked doors / the abode of Truth
In the final sonnet, Noyes and Truth have "locked the doors" and are sharing laughter like lovers in the dark. This image implies that true truth isn't about public displays or manifestos — it's a personal, intimate conviction that doesn't require validation from the crowd.

§06Historical context

Historical context

Alfred Noyes penned this sequence in the early 1920s, during a time of intense cultural unease in Britain. The First World War had shattered the Victorian sense of certainty, and a wave of writers—many linked to Bloomsbury or European modernism—were tearing down the moral and aesthetic structures of the previous century. As a traditionalist in both his political and poetic views, Noyes observed this shift with concern. He perceived the emergence of Bolshevism in Russia, the popularity of candid sexual literature, the impact of Nietzsche and Freud, and the increasing acceptance of literary irony and agnosticism as interconnected signs of a broader issue: the abandonment of enduring values in favor of change and denial. These five poems represent his response, crafted in traditional forms like sonnets and rhymed stanzas, serving as a clear assertion that artistry and moral depth were very much alive. The subtitle's references to Babylon and Pisgah, along with nods to Shakespeare, Milton, and the fallen of Flanders, firmly situate Noyes within a long-standing English tradition he believed was under threat.

§07FAQ

Questions readers ask

They are stock characters from commedia dell'arte, the Italian theatrical tradition. Pantaloon represents the foolish, greedy old man; Columbine embodies the young, lively woman often stuck with him against her will; Pierrot is the romantic, sensitive young man who loves her. Noyes uses these characters to illustrate that the so-called "daring" modern novel about a love triangle and social reform is really just the same old pantomime dressed up in a new style.

Read next

Poems in the same key