Skip to content
Storgy

The Reader's Atlas · Compare · War's Witnesses

Dulce et Decorum EstIn Flanders Fields

Put "Dulce et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen alongside "In Flanders Fields" by John McCrae, and you can immediately sense the tension between them. Both poems were penned by soldiers during the First World War and share a focus on the dead.

  • Poets

    Wilfred Owen / John McCrae

  • Years

    —

  • Chapter

    War's Witnesses

§01 The thesis

Dulce et Decorum Est & In Flanders Fields

A reader's case for putting these two side by side — what each carries, and what they argue when they sit on the same page.

McCrae's poem, written in 1915 after the Second Battle of Ypres, allows the fallen soldiers to voice their thoughts. They talk about the poppies blooming over their graves and the larks singing above them, urging the living to take up their fight, or else their sacrifices will have been in vain. It’s like a baton pass. In contrast, Owen's poem, crafted between 1917 and 1918, refuses to accept that baton. He immerses you in a gas attack, forcing you to witness a man suffocate in his own lungs, and declares that anyone who romanticizes dying for your country as "sweet and fitting" is deceiving you. Same war. Same mud. One poem serves as a recruitment poster in verse, while the other dismantles that narrative. **McCrae channels grief; Owen turns it into a weapon against the very cause that created it.**

§02 The dialectic axes

The two poems on four axes

Each axis isolates one specific vector — speaker, form, image, closing move — and reads the two poems against each other on that single dimension.

01Speaker

Poem A · Dulce et Decorum Est

Owen's speaker is a soldier who speaks directly to the reader — an eyewitness who has seen a comrade die in a gas attack and can't forget that image. The voice is personal, intense, and accusatory. By the last stanza, it shifts focus, addressing anyone who has ever glorified war.

Poem B · In Flanders Fields

McCrae's speakers are the dead themselves, a collective voice emerging from the graves beneath the Flanders poppies. The use of "we" forms a unified chorus of the fallen, giving the poem a ceremonial, almost religious authority.
02Form

Poem A · Dulce et Decorum Est

Owen employs a modified sonnet format — consisting of two quatrains and a six-line sestet — incorporating intentional slant rhymes that prevent the poem from sounding overly polished. This formal disruption reflects the chaos of the experience being depicted.

Poem B · In Flanders Fields

McCrae employs a rondeau, which is a French fixed form characterized by a repeating refrain and a strict rhyme scheme. This circular structure strengthens the poem's message: the dead continuously return, and the obligation is perpetually renewed.
03Imagery

Poem A · Dulce et Decorum Est

Owen's images are raw and deny any sense of solace: a man struggling with a gas mask, a body tossed into a wagon, a face "like a devil's sick of sin." The imagery aims to eliminate comfort and create an unbridgeable distance.

Poem B · In Flanders Fields

McCrae's images — poppies, larks, the torch — carry a natural and symbolic weight rather than being graphic. The battlefield becomes a sort of sacred space. While death is acknowledged, it’s presented in a way that renders it more bearable and even beautiful.
04Closing Move

Poem A · Dulce et Decorum Est

Owen concludes by quoting the Latin phrase "Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori"—meaning it is sweet and fitting to die for one's country—and then dismantles it. He refers to it as "the old Lie," emphasizing both words, and targets anyone who shares this notion with young men heading off to war.

Poem B · In Flanders Fields

McCrae concludes with a haunting ultimatum from the deceased: if the living do not embrace the struggle and carry on the fight, the dead will remain restless. This final statement transforms grief into a sense of duty and presents ongoing resistance as a way to honor those who have fallen.

§03 Synthesis & departure

The shared ground and the divergence

Shared

The most obvious common ground between the two poets is their shared experience as soldiers. Both wrote about their firsthand encounters on the Western Front and published their most famous works while the war was still ongoing. This close proximity to death isn’t just for show; it lends both poems a weight and authority that civilian poetry from that time lacks. Each poem also focuses on the image of dead soldiers, which serves as a moral burden for the living. In McCrae's poem, the dead urge the living to carry on; in Owen's, they demand honesty. In both cases, the presence of the corpse drives the poem's message. When it comes to structure, both poets prefer traditional forms over experimental styles. McCrae employs a rondeau, a tightly rhymed French form, while Owen opts for a modified sonnet with slant rhyme. These choices ground chaotic themes within familiar, almost ritualistic structures, making the impact of the content resonate more strongly because the form provides stability. Lastly, both poems have transcended the literary world. McCrae's work introduced the red poppy as a symbol of remembrance, while Owen's final Latin line has become a concise critique of nationalist war mythology.

Where they diverge

The divergence begins with whose voice you hear. In McCrae's poem, the dead speak for themselves — a collective "we" emerging from beneath the poppies. This choice fosters solidarity and evokes deep emotions, but it also allows the dead to voice their arguments. In contrast, Owen's speaker is alive, present, and filled with rage. He isn't recounting events from beyond the grave; he's describing them from just the next bunk, unable to find sleep. The imagery is equally distinct. McCrae's battlefield features larks, poppies, and the torch of sacrifice — images that transform death into something meaningful and even beautiful. Owen's battlefield presents a man "guttering, choking, drowning," with a face "like a devil's sick of sin." While McCrae romanticizes the fallen, Owen forces the reader to confront the body at its most harrowing moment. The final moves illustrate the clearest divergence. McCrae concludes with a conditional threat: if you fail to continue the fight, the dead will not find peace. Owen, on the other hand, ends by dismissing the Latin motto glorifying honorable death as a lie spun by an old man to a child. One poem calls for more war, while the other condemns the very language that promotes it.

§04 A reader's order of operations

Which to read first

If you found the solemn and ceremonial tone of "In Flanders Fields" moving, consider reading "Dulce et Decorum Est" next. It won't necessarily change your opinion of McCrae, but Owen poses a direct question about the world that gave rise to McCrae's poem. These two works genuinely engage in a dialogue, and you need to appreciate both perspectives to grasp the full impact of that conversation. On the other hand, if you started with Owen and want to see what he was resisting, "In Flanders Fields" represents exactly the kind of poem he critiqued — not from a cynical standpoint, but as a genuine and well-meaning voice from a tradition he believed was leading young men to their deaths.

§05 Reader's questions

On Dulce et Decorum Est vs In Flanders Fields, frequently asked

Answer

Yes, often. They work well together in high school and university courses on war literature because they embody opposing views — one celebrating pro-war sacrifice and the other offering an anti-war critique — yet both arise from the same historical context and carry firsthand authority.

§06 More from this chapter

From the charge to the trench

14 comparisons in this chapter

See all chapters →