Skip to content
Storgy

Character analysis

Napoleon Bonaparte

in War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy

Napoleon Bonaparte in War and Peace operates more as a symbolic figure than a fully fleshed-out protagonist — he embodies Tolstoy's critique of the "great man" theory of history. He shows up in several key scenes, but Tolstoy often diminishes his grandeur. At Austerlitz, Napoleon looks over the battlefield and spots the wounded Prince Andrei lying under the vast sky; his comment — "That is a fine death" — feels like empty vanity to Andrei, ruining the admiration he once had for him. At Borodino, Napoleon gives orders that fail to reach their intended targets, highlighting Tolstoy's claim that commanders don't really control battles. When he enters the deserted Moscow — the city he thought would cap off his campaign — it turns into a humiliation instead of a victory, as no delegation comes to surrender the city and it burns around him.

In terms of physical description, Tolstoy intentionally deflates Napoleon's image: he is short, plump, and has small white hands that he admires with a sense of satisfaction — details that poke fun at the legendary figure. His story shifts from seeming all-powerful to becoming irrelevant; by the time of the retreat from Moscow, he is just another person caught up in historical forces that dwarf individual will.

Notable traits include immense vanity, a dramatic self-awareness, and a disconnect from human suffering that Tolstoy presents as moral emptiness. He acts as a dark contrast to the novel's spiritual seekers, illustrating the futility of ambition driven by ego.

01

Who they are

Napoleon Bonaparte enters War and Peace not as a human being to be understood from the inside but as a test case for a philosophical argument. Tolstoy explicitly states throughout the novel's second epilogue, and in the war narratives, that the "great man" theory of history — the notion that exceptional individuals shape the world to their will — is a dangerous illusion. Napoleon serves as the prime example of that illusion. He is physically depicted in ways that deflate his legendary status: short, plump, with small white hands he regards with evident self-satisfaction. These details are significant. Tolstoy insists that the colossal shadow Napoleon casts in European imagination has minimal correspondence with the ordinary, vain, somewhat ridiculous man beneath it. He speaks in theatrical gestures and performs emotion rather than genuinely feeling it, with Tolstoy tracing every grand pose back to the same hollow source: an ego that has confused its own reflection for the movement of history.

02

Arc & motivation

Napoleon's trajectory in the novel is a sustained act of deflation. He arrives already at the peak of his legend, revered by characters like the young Prince Andrei and Pierre Bezukhov. By the retreat from Moscow, he becomes, in Tolstoy's framing, just another particle swept along by forces no individual can control. His motivation is vanity masquerading as destiny. He genuinely believes — and this belief renders him dangerous rather than merely ridiculous — that his will shapes events. The arc Tolstoy constructs for him moves from apparent omnipotence at Austerlitz, through the hollow triumph of Borodino, to the humiliation of entering a deserted, burning Moscow only to find no delegation waiting to surrender the city, no ceremony to affirm his genius. Each stage strips away a layer of the myth until what remains is a man giving orders that fail to reach their targets, stranded in a city that refuses to signify what he needs it to signify.

03

Key moments

At Austerlitz, Napoleon surveys the battlefield after his victory and discovers the wounded Prince Andrei lying under the immense sky. His remark — "That is a fine death" — is intended as magnanimous, even romantic. Andrei, who has just experienced a genuine interior revelation while gazing up at that sky, perceives the comment as mere theater, the utterance of a man who processes suffering as aesthetic material for his self-image. This moment serves as one of Tolstoy's most economical demonstrations of Napoleon's moral vacancy.

At Borodino, Napoleon issues a flurry of orders with characteristic theatrical energy, and the novel carefully depicts those orders dissipating before reaching the field, intercepted by the chaos of actual combat. The battle is not commanded; it unfolds. Napoleon's physical distance from the fighting — he observes from afar — becomes a spatial metaphor for the novel's central historical argument.

In Moscow, the anticipated climax of the campaign devolves into farce. The city is abandoned, then burning. No keys are presented, no surrender acknowledged. Napoleon waits for a meaning that fails to arrive.

04

Relationships in depth

With Andrei Bolkonsky, Napoleon functions as a shattered idol. Andrei enters the 1805 campaign partly infatuated with Napoleonic glory; the Austerlitz encounter irrevocably destroys that admiration and redirects Andrei toward the spiritual questions that will define the remainder of his life. Napoleon is, unknowingly, the catalyst of Andrei's disillusionment.

With Pierre Bezukhov, the relationship embodies obsessive, eventually absurd projection. Pierre's early admiration leads him to Borodino as a spectator, and later to a feverish plan to assassinate Napoleon in Moscow — a scheme that disintegrates into confusion and is never executed. The grandiosity of Pierre's Napoleonic fantasy, along with its comic failure, reflects Tolstoy's judgment on Napoleon: unworthy of the myth created around him.

With Kutuzov, Napoleon is defined by contrast. Kutuzov dozes through councils, defers to the collective spirit of the army, and relies on time and attrition. Napoleon performs command. The outcome of the Russian campaign is Tolstoy's argument made visible: patient, self-effacing surrender to historical forces triumphs over theatrical, ego-driven genius.

05

Connected characters

  • Prince Andrei Bolkonsky

    The most charged direct encounter in the novel: after Austerlitz, Napoleon stands over the fallen Andrei and pronounces his wound a 'fine death.' The moment crystallizes Andrei's disillusionment — the idol he once worshipped reveals himself as a posturing egotist, catalyzing Andrei's deeper spiritual search.

  • Pierre Bezukhov

    Pierre's obsessive fascination with Napoleon drives a significant portion of his early arc; he initially admires him as a world-historical genius. Pierre even travels to Borodino to witness Napoleon's power firsthand and later, in a feverish fantasy, plans to assassinate him in Moscow — a plan that collapses into absurdity, mirroring Tolstoy's view of Napoleon as ultimately unworthy of such mythologizing.

  • Field Marshal Kutuzov

    Tolstoy constructs Kutuzov as Napoleon's philosophical antithesis. Where Napoleon imposes his will on events through theatrical command, Kutuzov yields to the natural flow of history — sleeping through councils, trusting the army's spirit. The contrast is the novel's central argument: patient, self-effacing wisdom defeats vainglorious genius.

  • Nikolai Rostov

    Nikolai fights against Napoleon's forces at Schöngraben and Austerlitz. His battlefield terror and confusion directly counter the Napoleonic myth of war as glory, grounding the abstract historical figure in the visceral human cost of his campaigns.

Use this in your essay

  • Napoleon as philosophical argument

    Analyze how Tolstoy's characterization of Napoleon challenges the "great man" theory of history, and what narrative techniques — physical description, failed orders, the empty Moscow — support that argument.

  • Deflation as literary strategy

    Explore the role of physical details (the white hands, the short plump figure) in undermining Napoleonic legend; how does Tolstoy utilize the body to convey a historiographical point?

  • Andrei's disillusionment at Austerlitz

    Examine the Austerlitz encounter as a pivotal moment in Andrei's spiritual journey; what does Napoleon's remark reveal about each man's relationship to mortality and meaning?

  • Napoleon and Pierre as doubles

    Both men are grandiose, both attempt to impose a private narrative on historical events, and both are humbled by reality — argue the case that Pierre's early journey is a comedic, survivable version of Napoleon's tragedy.

  • Kutuzov versus Napoleon

    Using specific scenes from the Borodino chapters and the Moscow retreat, formulate a thesis regarding what qualities Tolstoy presents as genuinely effective leadership, and why Napoleon's counterpart emerges victorious.