In your essay, be sure to:

Your essay should present a clear, defensible thesis and back it up with specific textual evidence.

• Clearly explain Raskolnikov's theory and its moral consequences
• Analyze key moments (such as the murder, his interactions with Sonia, and his dialogues with Porfiry) as evidence for or against your argument
• Explore how guilt, isolation, and eventual confession serve as critiques of ideology
• Consider how Dostoevsky employs characterization, narrative structure, and symbolism to strengthen his argument

Your essay should

• Present a clear, defensible thesis that articulates how Dostoevsky uses the novel's events to respond to Raskolnikov's ideology.
• Include at least three pieces of textual evidence (e.g., Raskolnikov's internal thoughts, his interactions with Sonia, Porfiry's questioning, the epilogue).
• Analyze how literary elements — such as psychological realism, foil characters (e.g., Svidrigailov compared to Raskolnikov), symbolism (e.g., the cross, the resurrection of Lazarus), and narrative point of view — enhance Dostoevsky's thematic argument.
• Engage with the moral and philosophical dimensions of the text, examining how guilt, suffering, and redemption serve as counterarguments to Raskolnikov's rationalism.
• Conclude by reflecting on the broader implications of Dostoevsky's critique regarding questions of individual conscience, moral relativism, and societal law.

Tip

Focus on analysis rather than summarizing the plot. Your essay should show close reading and a continuous analytical argument.

Your essay should:

• Present a clear, defensible thesis regarding Dostoevsky's philosophical view on Raskolnikov's theory.
• Incorporate at least three pieces of textual evidence from different sections of the novel.
• Examine how literary elements (like psychological realism, symbolism, and foil characters such as Sonia or Svidrigailov) bolster your argument.
• Consider a counterargument: acknowledge and counter an interpretation that disputes your thesis.
• Wrap up by linking Dostoevsky's critique to a wider theme — such as guilt, redemption, free will, or the limitations of rationalism.