Skip to content

PASSAGES OF THE PREFACE. by Percy Bysshe Shelley: Summary, Meaning & Analysis

Percy Bysshe Shelley

This prose-poem is taken from Shelley's preface to *Adonais* (1821), his tribute to John Keats.

The poem
...the expression of my indignation and sympathy. I will allow myself a first and last word on the subject of calumny as it relates to me. As an author I have dared and invited censure. If I understand myself, I have written neither for profit nor for fame. I have employed my poetical compositions and publications simply as the instruments of that sympathy between myself and others which the ardent and unbounded love I cherished for my kind incited me to acquire. I expected all sorts of stupidity and insolent contempt from those... ...These compositions (excepting the tragedy of “The Cenci”, which was written rather to try my powers than to unburthen my full heart) are insufficiently...commendation than perhaps they deserve, even from their bitterest enemies; but they have not attained any corresponding popularity. As a man, I shrink from notice and regard; the ebb and flow of the world vexes me; I desire to be left in peace. Persecution, contumely, and calumny have been heaped upon me in profuse measure; and domestic conspiracy and legal oppression have violated in my person the most sacred rights of nature and humanity. The bigot will say it was the recompense of my errors; the man of the world will call it the result of my imprudence; but never upon one head... ...Reviewers, with some rare exceptions, are a most stupid and malignant race. As a bankrupt thief turns thieftaker in despair, so an unsuccessful author turns critic. But a young spirit panting for fame, doubtful of its powers, and certain only of its aspirations, is ill qualified to assign its true value to the sneer of this world. He knows not that such stuff as this is of the abortive and monstrous births which time consumes as fast as it produces. He sees the truth and falsehood, the merits and demerits, of his case inextricably entangled...No personal offence should have drawn from me this public comment upon such stuff... ...The offence of this poor victim seems to have consisted solely in his intimacy with Leigh Hunt, Mr. Hazlitt, and some other enemies of despotism and superstition. My friend Hunt has a very hard skull to crack, and will take a deal of killing. I do not know much of Mr. Hazlitt, but... ...I knew personally but little of Keats; but on the news of his situation I wrote to him, suggesting the propriety of trying the Italian climate, and inviting him to join me. Unfortunately he did not allow me...

Public domain · sourced from Project Gutenberg

Quick summary
This prose-poem is taken from Shelley's preface to *Adonais* (1821), his tribute to John Keats. In this piece, Shelley stands up for himself and his friends against the harsh criticism they faced, insisting that his writing stems from a true passion for humanity rather than a desire for wealth or recognition. He also expresses sorrow over how Keats was treated and shares his own feelings of bitterness regarding the persecution he has experienced.
Themes

Line-by-line

...the expression of my indignation and sympathy. I will allow myself / a first and last word on the subject of calumny as it relates to me.
Shelley begins by stating that he will address the slander aimed at him—just this once. The term *calumny* (meaning false and damaging accusation) indicates his sense of being unjustly targeted. He presents his remarks as a personal defense and a principled stand, steering clear of any self-pity.
As an author I have dared and invited censure. If I understand myself, / I have written neither for profit nor for fame.
Shelley acknowledges that he anticipated backlash from his radical ideas—he even *invited* it. However, he asserts that his motivations were never about financial gain or fame. He wrote, he explains, to create a connection of sympathy with others, fueled by a profound love for humanity. This reflects a classic Romantic notion: the poet as a selfless servant of emotion.
These compositions (excepting the tragedy of 'The Cenci'...) are insufficiently...commendation than perhaps they deserve...
Shelley recognizes that his works have garnered some praise, but nothing close to mainstream success. He makes an exception for *The Cenci*, which he approached more as a technical exercise than an emotional expression — a rare instance of him reflecting on his craft. The gap between the critical acclaim and the public's indifference clearly affects him.
As a man, I shrink from notice and regard; the ebb and flow of the world vexes me; / I desire to be left in peace.
Here, Shelley distinguishes between his public persona as an author and his private identity. Personally, he avoids the spotlight — the clamor of social life drains him. The subsequent list (persecution, contumely, calumny, domestic conspiracy, legal oppression) feels like a record of genuine suffering: Shelley lost custody of his children and faced relentless criticism for his atheism and political views.
Reviewers, with some rare exceptions, are a most stupid and malignant race. / As a bankrupt thief turns thieftaker in despair, so an unsuccessful author turns critic.
This is the most quotable passage in the preface. Shelley's disdain for critics is both sharp and humorous: a failed writer turns into a critic just like a failed thief becomes an informer—driven by spite and desperation. He then shifts to feeling for any young, ambitious writer who takes these jabs personally, unaware that negative reviews fade away quickly.
The offence of this poor victim seems to have consisted solely in his intimacy with Leigh Hunt, Mr. Hazlitt, and some other enemies of despotism and superstition.
Shelley begins to defend a specific unnamed individual—most likely Keats or someone from the Hunt circle—who faced criticism merely for associating with the wrong crowd. Both Leigh Hunt and William Hazlitt became targets of conservative publications such as *Blackwood's* and the *Quarterly Review*. By using the phrase 'enemies of despotism and superstition,' Shelley indicates that he views the literary conflict as fundamentally political.
I knew personally but little of Keats; but on the news of his situation / I wrote to him, suggesting the propriety of trying the Italian climate...
Shelley ends with a poignant reference to Keats, whose tuberculosis was getting worse. Shelley had invited him to Italy, but Keats turned it down and passed away in Rome in February 1821. The sense of regret is subtle yet profound. This section links the preface directly to *Adonais*, the elegy Shelley composed in honor of Keats, providing the entire piece with its emotional foundation.

Tone & mood

The tone is indignant and hurt, yet it avoids slipping into self-pity. Shelley writes with the confidence of someone who has been pushed to their limit and has chosen to respond assertively. There are moments of biting humor—the image of the thief who becomes a thieftaker is almost brutal—mixed with truly tender sections, particularly regarding Keats. Beneath the anger lies a thread of idealism: Shelley still holds on to the belief that poetry serves to unite people, even when the world appears intent on punishing him for that conviction.

Symbols & metaphors

  • CalumnyFalse accusation represents the entire system of conservative literary and legal culture that Shelley believed had aimed at him — from negative reviews to the court cases that took away his children.
  • The bankrupt thief turned thieftakerA striking comparison for the unsuccessful writer who turns into a critic. It suggests that, in Shelley's view, criticism is more about revenge than true judgment — stemming from envy and failure rather than authentic appreciation.
  • The Italian climateShelley's invitation to Keats to visit Italy serves as a practical medical recommendation and embodies the Romantic notion of the south as a land of warmth, beauty, and creative rejuvenation. Keats's decision to decline adds a layer of tragedy to this symbol.
  • Ebb and flow of the worldThe tidal metaphor reflects Shelley's view of public life as restless and indifferent — a force that drains rather than uplifts a person. This reinforces his expressed wish to step back from the spotlight.
  • Leigh Hunt and Hazlitt as 'enemies of despotism'These real names symbolize a community under attack — radical writers whose friendship was seen as a crime by the conservative establishment.

Historical context

Shelley wrote this preface for *Adonais* (1821), his pastoral elegy mourning John Keats, who passed away from tuberculosis in Rome at the young age of twenty-five. Shelley passionately believed — though he was mistaken — that a harsh review in the *Quarterly Review* had crushed Keats's spirit and contributed to his early death. As a result, the preface serves as both a literary manifesto and a critique of the Tory press. By 1821, Shelley had been exiled from England, had lost custody of his children from his first wife Harriet, and had been publicly branded as an atheist and immoralist. His circle, which included Leigh Hunt, William Hazlitt, and Lord Byron, was often ridiculed in conservative publications. Shelley himself drowned off the Italian coast the following year, in 1822, never to return to England.

FAQ

It’s prose — more specifically, the preface that Shelley wrote for his elegy *Adonais*. This piece is examined as a literary work in its own right due to its passionate, nearly lyrical quality and its significance as a representation of Romantic poetic values. You might consider it a prose-poem or a literary manifesto.

Similar poems