The Annotated Edition
By Jean Froissart by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
A speaker addresses Love directly, questioning what it seeks from them and acknowledging the lack of stability or predictability in it.
- Core theme
- Doubt
Study actions
§01Quick summary
What this poem is about
§02Themes
Recurring themes
§03Line by line
Stanza by stanza, with notes
Love, love, what wilt thou with this heart of mine? / Naught see I fixed or sure in thee!
Editor's note
The speaker confronts Love as if it were a person right in front of them, asking pointedly about its intentions. The repetition of "Love" at the beginning carries a sense of urgency, bordering on desperation. The next line highlights the central issue: love lacks reliability and certainty. The speaker isn't angry at this point; they are simply confused and feeling somewhat vulnerable.
I do not know thee,--nor what deeds are thine: / Love, love, what wilt thou with this heart of mine?
Editor's note
This stanza adds to the confusion. The speaker isn't just saying love is unpredictable—they openly admit they don't understand it at all, neither its nature nor its actions. The refrain comes back here, and the repetition feels less like a rhetorical device and more like someone truly stuck, asking the same question because they still haven't found an answer.
Shall I be mute, or vows with prayers combine? / Ye who are blessed in loving, tell it me:
Editor's note
Now the speaker looks outward, inviting those who have truly found happiness in love to reveal their secret. The question "shall I be mute" indicates the speaker is pondering whether to continue sharing their feelings or if remaining silent would be wiser. "Vows with prayers" suggests a spiritual tone—here, love is seen as something almost sacred, or at least something that requires a ritualistic approach.
Love, love, what wilt thou with this heart of mine? / Naught see I permanent or sure in thee!
Editor's note
The closing lines revisit the refrain one last time, but with a significant twist: "fixed" changes to "permanent." This slight adjustment makes the complaint seem more definitive — it's not just that love is unstable at the moment, but that it lacks anything enduring by its very nature. The poem concludes without resolution, and that's precisely the intention.
§04Tone & mood
How this poem feels
§05Symbols & metaphors
Symbols & metaphors
- The heart
- The heart represents the speaker's true self — the most vulnerable part of them. The anxiety at the core of the poem revolves around giving it to Love or having Love take it without any clear reason.
- Love as a person
- By addressing Love directly as "thou," the speaker transforms an abstract emotion into a character with intentions and actions. This portrayal makes love seem like an entity influencing the speaker rather than merely a feeling the speaker experiences.
- The refrain
- The returning lines aren't just a formal device; they reflect how unanswered questions about love tend to circle back on themselves. The speaker keeps ending up in the same spot because there's never a resolution.
- Vows and prayers
- These words draw from religious devotion, implying that love requires a form of faith — a commitment made without guarantees. The speaker questions whether such surrender is wise or even achievable.
§06Form & structure
Form & structure
- Meter
- iambic pentameter
- Rhyme
- ABABB ABABC
§07Historical context
Historical context
§08FAQ
Questions readers ask
Did Longfellow write this poem himself, or is it a translation?
It's a translation, or a close imitation, of a rondel by Jean Froissart, the 14th-century French poet and historian. Longfellow was a prolific translator who often drew from medieval European sources. The title makes it clear that he's crediting Froissart rather than presenting the poem as his own original creation.
What is a rondel, and how does it work here?
A rondel is a medieval French poem with a specific structure that includes a repeating refrain. The first two lines reappear in the middle and at the end, often with slight variations. For example, in the lines "Love, love, what wilt thou with this heart of mine? / Naught see I fixed or sure in thee!" the phrase returns twice, and in the final instance, "fixed" is replaced with "permanent" — a small but significant change.
Why does the speaker address Love as if it's a person?
This technique is known as apostrophe — addressing an abstract idea or a figure that’s not present. In the courtly love tradition that Froissart was part of, Love was often depicted as a strong, almost divine force with its own will. Calling it "thou" makes the speaker's helplessness more palpable: they’re not merely puzzled by an emotion; they’re confronting something that seems to have intentions aimed at them.
What does "Naught see I fixed or sure in thee" mean?
It suggests that the speaker sees love as completely unstable and unreliable. "Naught" is an archaic term for "nothing," while "fixed" refers to being steady or constant. Essentially, the speaker feels that love offers no firm foundation—it's ever-changing, unpredictable, and they struggle to understand its true nature or intentions.
Why does the last line change "fixed" to "permanent"?
It's a small but intentional shift. "Fixed" implies something that could potentially be secured but isn't. "Permanent" takes it a step further — it suggests that nothing truly lasting exists in love by its very nature. This change gives the final statement a more resigned and definitive tone, as if the speaker has transitioned from confusion to a stark conclusion.
Who are the "ye who are blessed in loving" the speaker talks to?
The speaker looks to those who have truly discovered happiness or certainty in love—the fortunate ones who appear to have cracked the code. It's a moment of reaching out after all the self-reflection. The speaker is eager to learn their secret, suggesting they feel they don’t quite fit in with that crowd.
What is the overall mood of the poem?
Quietly lost. The speaker isn't raging or heartbreakingly dramatic — they're truly confused and slightly vulnerable. The repeated refrain creates a circular, restless energy in the poem, akin to someone pacing the same few steps, unsure of where to go next.
Is this poem about a specific person the speaker loves, or about love in general?
It's about love in its purest form. There's no "you" as a specific individual—the speaker is grappling with love as an idea and a powerful force, rather than focusing on a specific relationship. This aligns closely with the courtly love tradition, where Love itself was the main focus, almost treated like a deity to be explored or sought after.
Citation
Cite this poem
MLA
Longfellow, Henry Wadsworth. "By Jean Froissart." Storgy, https://storgy.com/poems/by-jean-froissart-henry-wadsworth-longfellow/.
APA
Longfellow, H. W. (n.d.). By jean froissart. Storgy. https://storgy.com/poems/by-jean-froissart-henry-wadsworth-longfellow/
Row A — Thesis
1 ptIn his translation of Jean Froissart's rondel, Longfellow renders love not as a stable force but as an agent of bewildering dispossession: the speaker's repeated, unanswered apostrophe to love exposes a self so destabilized by passion that …
- Row B — Evidence + Commentary4 pts
- Row C — Sophistication1 pt
- Common student errors
Available on any Storgy plan — model paragraphs, band callouts, and common student errors for every poem.
The study desk
Teaching materials and reference tools prepared for this poem.
Adjacent texts in the archive
Read next