Frankenstein

# Essay Prompt: *Frankenstein* by Mary Shelley **Prompt:** In Mary Shelley's *Frankenstein*, Victor Frankenstein's unyielding quest for scientific knowledge leads to tragic outcomes rather than success. **Argue that unchecked ambition is the real monster in *Frankenstein***, and that Shelley employs both Victor and his Creature to caution readers about the perils of creation without accountability. --- **In your essay, be sure to:** - Craft a clear, arguable thesis that goes beyond simply summarizing the plot. - Use **at least three specific textual examples** (quotations or scenes) to back up your argument. - Analyze how Shelley utilizes **characterization, narrative structure, and/or Gothic imagery** to deliver her thematic warning. - Address a **counterargument**: some readers contend that the Creature — not Victor — is morally responsible for the violence in the novel. Engage with this perspective and clarify why your interpretation is more convincing. - Conclude by linking Shelley’s 19th-century concerns to a **broader or contemporary context** (e.g., bioethics, artificial intelligence, scientific hubris). --- **Suggested length:** 4–6 paragraphs (approximately 800–1,200 words) **Suggested texts/passages to consider:** - Victor's early obsession with "the secrets of heaven and earth" (Vol. 1, Ch. 2) - The Creature's poignant account of abandonment (Vol. 2, Ch. 7) - Victor's deathbed confession to Walton (Vol. 3, Ch. 7)

ap_lit · ib_lang_lit · aqa · common_core_ela

# Essay Prompt: *Frankenstein* by Mary Shelley **Prompt:** In Mary Shelley's *Frankenstein*, Victor Frankenstein's relentless quest for scientific knowledge ultimately results in destruction instead of progress. **Argue that unchecked ambition is the true "monster" of the novel.** In your essay, explore how Shelley portrays Victor's obsession, the Creature's suffering, and the ramifications of creation to highlight the dangers of scientific arrogance. Use specific textual evidence to support your argument, and reflect on how Shelley's critique remains relevant to contemporary ethical discussions about science and technology. --- **Guiding Questions to Consider:** - How does Victor's ambition compare to or differ from the Creature's desires? - In what ways does Shelley employ the frame narrative (Walton's letters) to strengthen her thematic warning? - Who holds greater moral responsibility — the creator or the creation — and why? **Requirements:** 4–6 paragraphs | Textual evidence required | MLA or Chicago citation format

ap_lit · ib_lang_lit · aqa · common_core_ela

# Essay Prompt: *Frankenstein* by Mary Shelley **Prompt:** In *Frankenstein*, Mary Shelley suggests that the real monster isn't the Creature, but rather Victor Frankenstein himself. Write a well-developed argumentative essay in which you **agree, disagree, or qualify** this assertion. Using specific evidence from the novel, explore how Shelley employs characterization, narrative structure, and themes of responsibility and ambition to illustrate what it truly means to be "monstrous." --- **Guidance for Students:** - **Introduce** the main conflict between creator and creation in the novel. - **Develop a clear thesis** that takes a defensible stance on who — or what — embodies the true source of monstrosity in the text. - **Use at least three pieces of textual evidence**, analyzing how each reinforces your argument. - **Consider** the novel's framing narrative (Walton's letters) and how it influences the reader's view of Victor and the Creature. - **Address a counterargument** and explain why your interpretation holds more weight. - **Conclude** by linking your argument to Shelley's broader critique of unrestrained scientific ambition and the ethics surrounding creation. --- *Suggested length: 4–6 paragraphs*

ap_lit · ib_lang_lit · aqa · common_core_ela