Skip to content
← Back to poem

Songs of Parting (missives).

Walt Whitman

The first three designations explain themselves. The fourth, _Leaves of

Grass_, is not so specially applicable to the particular poems of that

section here as I should have liked it to be; but I could not consent to

drop this typical name. The _Songs of Parting_, my fifth section, are

compositions in which the poet expresses his own sentiment regarding his

works, in which he forecasts their future, or consigns them to the reader's

consideration. It deserves mention that, in the copy of Whitman's last

American edition revised by his own hand, as previously noticed, the series

termed _Songs of Parting_ has been recast, and made to consist of poems of

the same character as those included in my section No. 5.

 

Comparatively few of Whitman's poems have been endowed by himself with

titles properly so called. Most of them are merely headed with the opening

words of the poems themselves--as "I was looking a long while;" "To get

betimes in Boston Town;" "When lilacs last in the door-yard bloomed;" and

so on. It seems to me that in a selection such a lengthy and circuitous

method of identifying the poems is not desirable: I should wish them to be

remembered by brief, repeatable, and significant titles. I have therefore

supplied titles of my own to such pieces as bear none in the original

edition: wherever a real title appears in that edition, I have retained it.

 

With these remarks I commend to the English reader the ensuing selection

from a writer whom I sincerely believe to be, whatever his faults, of the

order of _great_ poets, and by no means of pretty good ones. I would urge

the reader not to ask himself, and not to return any answer to the

questions, whether or not this poet is like other poets--whether or not the

particular application of rules of art which is found to hold good in the

works of those others, and to constitute a part of their excellence, can be

traced also in Whitman. Let the questions rather be--Is he powerful? Is he

American? Is he new? Is he rousing? Does he feel and make me feel? I

entertain no doubt as to the response which in due course of time will be

returned to these questions and such as these, in America, in England, and

elsewhere--or to the further question, "Is Whitman then indeed a true and a

great poet?" Lincoln's verdict bespeaks the ultimate decision upon him, in

his books as in his habit as he lives--"Well, _he_ looks like a man."

 

Walt Whitman occupies at the present moment a unique position on the globe,

and one which, even in past time, can have been occupied by only an

infinitesimally small number of men. He is the one man who entertains and

professes respecting himself the grave conviction that he is the actual and

prospective founder of a new poetic literature, and a great one--a

literature proportional to the material vastness and the unmeasured

destinies of America: he believes that the Columbus of the continent or the

Washington of the States was not more truly than himself in the future a

founder and upbuilder of this America. Surely a sublime conviction, and

expressed more than once in magnificent words--none more so than the lines

beginning

 

"Come, I will make this continent indissoluble."[7]

 

[Footnote 7: See the poem headed _Love of Comrades_, p. 308.]

 

Were the idea untrue, it would still be a glorious dream, which a man of

genius might be content to live in and die for: but is it untrue? Is it

not, on the contrary, true, if not absolutely, yet with a most genuine and

substantial approximation? I believe it _is_ thus true. I believe that

Whitman is one of the huge, as yet mainly unrecognised, forces of our time;

privileged to evoke, in a country hitherto still asking for its poet, a

fresh, athletic, and American poetry, and predestined to be traced up to by

generation after generation of believing and ardent--let us hope not

servile--disciples.

 

"Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world." Shelley, who knew

what he was talking about when poetry was the subject, has said it, and

with a profundity of truth Whitman seems in a peculiar degree marked out

for "legislation" of the kind referred to. His voice will one day be

potential or magisterial wherever the English language is spoken--that is

to say, in the four corners of the earth; and in his own American

hemisphere, the uttermost avatars of democracy will confess him not more

their announcer than their inspirer.