Skip to content
← Back to poem

A PRELIMINARY NOTE TO THE SECOND EDITION.

James Russell Lowell

Though it well may be reckoned, of all composition, the species at once

most delightful and healthy, is a thing which an author, unless he be

wealthy and willing to pay for that kind of delight, is not, in all

instances, called on to write, though there are, it is said, who, their

spirits to cheer, slip in a new title-page three times a year, and in

this way snuff up an imaginary savor of that sweetest of dishes, the

popular favor,--much as if a starved painter should fall to and treat

the Ugolino inside to a picture of meat.

 

You remember (if not, pray turn, backward and look) that, in writing the

preface which ushered my book, I treated you, excellent Public, not

merely with a cool disregard, but downright cavalierly. Now I would not

take back the least thing I then said, though I thereby could butter

both sides of my bread, for I never could see that an author owed aught

to the people he solaced, diverted, or taught; and, as for mere fame, I

have long ago learned that the persons by whom it is finally earned are

those with whom _your_ verdict weighed not a pin, unsustained by the

higher court sitting within.

 

But I wander from what I intended to say,--that you have, namely, shown

such a liberal way of thinking, and so much æsthetic perception of

anonymous worth in the handsome reception you gave to my book, spite of

some private piques (having bought the first thousand in barely two

weeks), that I think, past a doubt, if you measured the phiz of yours

most devotedly, Wonderful Quiz, you would find that its vertical section

was shorter, by an inch and two tenths, or 'twixt that and a quarter.

 

You have watched a child playing--in those wondrous years when belief is

not bound to the eyes and the ears, and the vision divine is so clear

and unmarred, that each baker of pies in the dirt is a bard? Give a

knife and a shingle, he fits out a fleet, and, on that little mud-puddle

over the street, his fancy, in purest good faith, will make sail round

the globe with a puff of his breath for a gale, will visit, in barely

ten minutes, all climes, and do the Columbus-feat hundreds of times. Or,

suppose the young poet fresh stored with delights from that Bible of

childhood, the Arabian Nights, he will turn to a crony and cry, 'Jack,

let's play that I am a Genius!' Jacky straightway makes Aladdin's lamp

out of a stone, and, for hours, they enjoy each his own supernatural

powers. This is all very pretty and pleasant, but then suppose our two

urchins, have grown into men, and both have turned authors,--one says to

his brother, 'Let's play we're the American somethings or other,--say

Homer or Sophocles, Goethe or Scott (only let them be big enough, no

matter what). Come, you shall be Byron or Pope, which you choose: I'll

be Coleridge, and both shall write mutual reviews.' So they both (as

mere strangers) before many days send each other a cord of anonymous

bays. Each piling his epithets, smiles in his sleeve to see what his

friend can be made to believe; each, reading the other's unbiased

review, thinks--Here's pretty high praise, but no more than my due.

Well, we laugh at them both, and yet make no great fuss when the same

farce is acted to benefit us. Even I, who, it asked, scarce a month

since, what Fudge meant, should have answered, the dear Public's

critical judgment, begin to think sharp-witted Horace spoke sooth when

he said that the Public _sometimes_ hit the truth.

 

In reading these lines, you perhaps have a vision of a person in pretty

good health and condition; and yet, since I put forth my primary

edition, I have been crushed, scorched, withered, used up and put down

(by Smith with the cordial assistance of Brown), in all, if you put any

faith in my rhymes, to the number of ninety-five several times, and,

while I am writing,--I tremble to think of it, for I may at this moment

be just on the brink of it,--Molybdostom, angry at being omitted, has

begun a critique,--am I not to be pitied?[1]

 

Now I shall not crush _them_ since, indeed, for that matter, no pressure

I know of could render them flatter; nor wither, nor scorch them,--no

action of fire could make either them or their articles drier; nor waste

time in putting them down--I am thinking not their own self-inflation

will keep them from sinking; for there's this contradiction about the

whole bevy,--though without the least weight, they are awfully heavy.

No, my dear honest bore, _surdo fabulam narras_, they are no more to me

than a rat in the arras. I can walk with the Doctor, get facts from the

Don, or draw out the Lambish quintessence of John, and feel nothing more

than a half-comic sorrow, to think that they all will be lying to-morrow

tossed carelessly up on the waste-paper shelves, and forgotten by all

but their half-dozen selves. Once snug in my attic, my fire in a roar, I

leave the whole pack of them outside the door. With Hakluyt or Purchas I

wander away to the black northern seas or barbaric Cathay; get _fou_

with O'Shanter, and sober me then with that builder of brick-kilnish

dramas, rare Ben; snuff Herbert, as holy as a flower on a grave; with

Fletcher wax tender, o'er Chapman grow brave; with Marlowe or Kyd take a

fine poet-rave; in Very, most Hebrew of Saxons, find peace; with Lycidas

welter on vext Irish seas; with Webster grow wild, and climb earthward

again, down by mystical Browne's Jacob's-ladder-like brain, to that

spiritual Pepys (Cotton's version) Montaigne; find a new depth in

Wordsworth, undreamed of before, that marvel, a poet divine who can

bore. Or, out of my study, the scholar thrown off, Nature holds up her

shield 'gainst the sneer and the scoff; the landscape, forever consoling

and kind, pours her wine and her oil on the smarts of the mind. The

waterfall, scattering its vanishing gems; the tall grove of hemlocks,

with moss on their stems, like plashes of sunlight; the pond in the

woods, where no foot but mine and the bittern's intrudes, where

pitcher-plants purple and gentians hard by recall to September the blue

of June's sky; these are all my kind neighbors, and leave me no wish to

say aught to you all, my poor critics, but--pish! I've buried the

hatchet: I'm twisting an allumette out of one of you now, and relighting

my calumet. In your private capacities, come when you please, I will

give you my hand and a fresh pipe apiece.

 

As I ran through the leaves of my poor little book, to take a fond

author's first tremulous look, it was quite an excitement to hunt the

_errata_, sprawled in as birds' tracks are in some kinds of strata (only

these made things crookeder). Fancy an heir that a father had seen born

well-featured and fair, turning suddenly wry-nosed, club-footed,

squint-eyed, hair-lipped, wapper-jawed, carrot-haired, from a pride

become an aversion,--my case was yet worse. A club-foot (by way of a

change) in a verse, I might have forgiven, an _o_'s being wry, a limp in

an _e_, or a cock in an _i_,--but to have the sweet babe of my brain

served in _pi!_ I am not queasy-stomached, but such a Thyestean banquet

as that was quite out of the question.

 

In the edition now issued no pains are neglected, and my verses, as

orators say, stand corrected. Yet some blunders remain of the public's

own make, which I wish to correct for my personal sake. For instance, a

character drawn in pure fun and condensing the traits of a dozen in one,

has been, as I hear, by some persons applied to a good friend of mine,

whom to stab in the side, as we walked along chatting and joking

together, would not be _my_ way. I can hardly tell whether a

question will ever arise in which he and I should by any strange fortune

agree, but meanwhile my esteem for him grows as I know him, and, though

not the best judge on earth of a poem, he knows what it is he is saying

and why, and is honest and fearless, two good points which I have not

found so rife I can easily smother my love for them, whether on my side

or t'other.

 

For my other _anonymi_, you may be sure that I know what is meant by a

caricature, and what by a portrait. There _are_ those who think it is

capital fun to be spattering their ink on quiet, unquarrelsome folk, but

the minute the game changes sides and the others begin it, they see

something savage and horrible in it. As for me I respect neither women

nor men for their gender, nor own any sex in a pen. I choose just to

hint to some causeless unfriends that, as far as I know, there are

always two ends (and one of them heaviest, too) to a staff, and two

parties also to every good laugh.