Skip to content
Storgy

The Reader's Atlas · Compare · Romantic Skies

The WindhoverThe Eagle

Put "The Windhover" by Gerard Manley Hopkins and "The Eagle" by Lord Alfred Tennyson side by side, and the first thing you notice is how different they are in scale — one poem has six lines, while the other is a fourteen-line sonnet so packed with meaning that it demands a second read.

  • Poets

    Gerard Manley Hopkins / Lord Alfred Tennyson

  • Years

  • Chapter

    Romantic Skies

§01 The thesis

The Windhover & The Eagle

A reader's case for putting these two side by side — what each carries, and what they argue when they sit on the same page.

This comparison is significant for another reason: these two poets represent adjacent yet distinct moments in Victorian England, and their approaches to the same subject — a raptor, a sky, a sudden drop — reveal a lot about their views on the purpose of poetry. Tennyson aims for a perfectly polished gem, an image that requires no embellishment. In contrast, Hopkins seeks something akin to religious ecstasy, employing a language that strains under the weight of its message. Together, the two poems provide a masterclass in how form influences meaning: stillness and rapture offer two completely different ways of appreciating the same bird in the same sky.

§02 The dialectic axes

The two poems on four axes

Each axis isolates one specific vector — speaker, form, image, closing move — and reads the two poems against each other on that single dimension.

01Speaker

Poem A · The Windhover

In "The Windhover," the speaker is clearly present — a priest observing the sky at dawn, filled with emotion, speaking directly to the bird before reflecting on what this sight signifies for his own faith and calling. The "I" in the opening line grounds everything that follows in a personal, almost confessional, experience.

Poem B · The Eagle

In "The Eagle," the speaker remains entirely absent, acting as an unseen observer. Tennyson presents the bird and the landscape with the calm objectivity of a painter, creating an impression that the eagle exists in its own right—untouched by any human feelings or interpretations.
02Form

Poem A · The Windhover

"The Windhover" is a Petrarchan sonnet crafted in Hopkins's unique sprung rhythm, where stresses accumulate without concern for the number of syllables. Compound adjectives blend into new words, lines are rich with alliteration, and the shift between octave and sestet signals a theological change in the poem. The structure of the poem appears to struggle with its themes.

Poem B · The Eagle

"The Eagle" consists of two three-line stanzas that share a single rhyme, giving it a tight, almost architectural feel. The short, end-stopped lines create a rhythm that feels like a held breath followed by a release. This structure reflects the poem's dramatic arc: a sense of stillness in the first stanza, followed by explosive motion in the second.
03Central Image

Poem A · The Windhover

Hopkins's main image is the kestrel hovering and circling in the morning air — but he quickly adds more layers. The bird's control of the wind symbolizes Christ's dominion over creation, and by the sestet, the imagery transitions to a ploughed field and glowing embers, both reflecting the same concealed beauty as the falcon. The image expands outward.

Poem B · The Eagle

Tennyson's main image is clear and remains focused: an eagle sitting on a cliff edge, solitary, near the sun, overlooking a choppy sea — and then the fall. There's no embellishment, no explanation. The image stands on its own, and Tennyson relies on it to convey the entire essence of the poem.
04Closing Move

Poem A · The Windhover

"The Windhover" concludes by emphasizing that even broken, humble things — embers that "fall, gall themselves, and gash gold-vermilion" — shine just as brightly as the falcon. This ending carries a paradoxical and devotional tone: beauty isn't exclusive to the spectacular. It leads to a broader discussion about theology.

Poem B · The Eagle

"The Eagle" concludes with the bird falling "like a thunderbolt." This simile is the only instance of figurative language Tennyson uses throughout the poem, and he reserves it for the final word. The ending delivers a striking impact — there’s no argument or moral, just the image reaching its unavoidable conclusion.

§03 Synthesis & departure

The shared ground and the divergence

Shared

Both poems focus on a lone raptor seen from below, building toward a single, powerful climax—the moment the bird unleashes its full force. In "The Eagle," that moment arrives with the final line's dive; in "The Windhover," it’s the falcon's control over the morning wind. Neither poet is truly documenting natural history. Instead, the bird serves as a means: for Tennyson, it embodies the sublime feeling of power and freedom; for Hopkins, it represents theological awe. The poems also emphasize the vertical dimension. Height is significant—the eagle grips a crag "close to the sun," while the windhover glides through the air in "his riding of the rolling level." The sky isn’t just a backdrop; it’s the stage where something genuine is unveiled. Both poets employ compression effectively. Tennyson encapsulates a complete dramatic arc in six lines, while Hopkins conveys a full spiritual argument in fourteen. Every syllable counts, which helps explain why both poems have remained in print for over a century.

Where they diverge

The sharpest difference lies in the meaning attributed to the bird. Tennyson's eagle represents exactly what you see: power, solitude, speed, and the thrill of the fall. The poem stays focused on the image without delving deeper. That restraint is intentional — "The Eagle" is a carving, not a sermon. In contrast, Hopkins naturally reaches beyond the image. The windhover is undeniably beautiful, but that beauty quickly serves as a testament to Christ's glory. The poem's dedication — "To Christ our Lord" — establishes the theological stakes before the first line even starts. Formally, the divide is equally pronounced. Tennyson employs a clean, end-stopped trimeter-and-tetrameter structure with precise rhymes (each triplet shares a single rhyme). Hopkins uses sprung rhythm, inventive phrases like "dapple-dawn-drawn," and internal rhyme, creating a sonnet that feels as if it’s straining against its own constraints. Tennyson's language is clear; you see through it to the bird. Hopkins's language is rich and forceful; you sense the flight in the very syllables.

§04 A reader's order of operations

Which to read first

If you enjoyed the concise imagery in "The Eagle," I recommend moving on to "The Windhover" next—but make sure to read it more than once. While Tennyson lets the imagery carry the weight, Hopkins relies on the sound to create meaning. You'll really appreciate the poem when you read it aloud and embrace the sprung rhythm. If you found the religious depth of "The Windhover" a bit overwhelming, "The Eagle" serves as a refreshing contrast: just six lines, free of doctrine, focusing on a bird, a sky, and a fall that strikes with the force of a slamming door.

§05 Reader's questions

On The Windhover vs The Eagle, frequently asked

Answer

Yes, especially in A-level and introductory university courses focused on Victorian poetry. They pair well because they address the same themes but differ greatly in length, style, and purpose, making the contrast straightforward to analyze and write about.

§06 More from this chapter

Birds, winds, and the visionary gleam

9 comparisons in this chapter

See all chapters →